Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case

Requests for arbitration

BunnyyHop and Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union

Initiated by  // Timothy :: talk  at 15:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

I was not the OP of these, but did participate.

Statement by TimothyBlue

BunnyyHop has been has been WP:BLUDGEONing discussions in an attempt to remove negative information or soften language related to communism in general and the Soviet Union and push their POV on the subject, an area covered by DS e-e. Examples (more examples in the ANI reports their edit history):

  1. GULAG and slavery: [2] continuation of [3]
  2. Marxist Leninism: [4]
  3. Crimean Tartars: [5]

Numerous editors respond to BunnyyHop, but it is an endless cycle of repeated arguments with slightly different wording WP:BLUDGEON, WP:IDHT, refusal to WP:LISTEN to others, more posts expecting users to WP:SATISFY. This has created a battleground on numerous talk pages, is discouraging others from participating, and hindering the discussion. This is an attempt to "win" a discussion by volume and exhausting other users. There posts often are manipulative in their intention and employ word games.

ANI closing statement at previous ANI from Drmies: "A majority of editors is of the view that BunnyyHop should be topic-banned for consistently non-neutral editing, but there is not currently consensus for this view. Nonetheless, if non-neutral editing by BunnyyHop continues, editors may request a block or other sanctions at WP:AE (if in a topic area subject to WP:DS) or at WP:ANI".

BunnyyHop has ~1,252 edits, mainly in the last 3 months, mainly on talk and project space. There edits show they are here on a mission.

I request appropriate enforcement of DS e-e for DE, TE, based on the above examples and ANI reports. I feel topic bans related to Eastern Europe, and Communism/Marxism/Socialism would be appropriate.  // Timothy :: talk  15:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by BunnyyHop

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

BunnyyHop and Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

BunnyyHop and Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)

Hi @Barkeep49:, I have a complete lack of experience in this area, so I thought this was the appropriate place/time, any advice/assistance on how to properly proceed would be very welcome. I will read the link you posted. Thank you,  // Timothy :: talk  16:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]