User contributions for AKAKIOS
Results for AKAKIOS talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 626 edits. Account created on 30 August 2013.
6 December 2015
- 10:0410:04, 6 December 2015 diff hist +51 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Important note
- 10:0310:03, 6 December 2015 diff hist +603 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Discussion of the "Criticism section" within this article
- 10:0010:00, 6 December 2015 diff hist +2 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Why the previous version is better
- 09:5909:59, 6 December 2015 diff hist −2 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Discussion of the "Criticism section" within this article
- 09:5909:59, 6 December 2015 diff hist −2 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Discussion of the "Criticism section" within this article
- 09:5809:58, 6 December 2015 diff hist +3 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Discussion of the "Criticism section" within this article
- 09:5609:56, 6 December 2015 diff hist +30,202 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Discussion of the "Criticism section" within this article: new section
- 09:0809:08, 6 December 2015 diff hist +1,084 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet →Criticism of Zwarte Piet
- 08:5808:58, 6 December 2015 diff hist −6,732 User talk:AKAKIOS I'm removing these notices because I feel they are unconstructive, aimed at making me out to be a vandal of sorts rather than the constructive user I hope to be and which my contributions show me to be.
- 08:5508:55, 6 December 2015 diff hist −590 Zwarte Piet Undid revision 693985200 by AKAKIOS (talk) Now logged in. But with same rationale, practice what you preach and discuss on talk page please.
- 08:5408:54, 6 December 2015 diff hist +590 Zwarte Piet Undid revision 693984795 by 77.161.200.75 (talk)
- 08:5308:53, 6 December 2015 diff hist +873 User talk:Walter Görlitz/Archived Talk to 2015-12 →Reverting without discussing on talk; December 2015: new section
5 December 2015
- 18:2518:25, 5 December 2015 diff hist +8 Zwarte Piet →Criticism of Zwarte Piet: Makes more sense to switch these two parts.
- 18:2118:21, 5 December 2015 diff hist +2 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 18:1918:19, 5 December 2015 diff hist −750 Sinterklaas →Zwarte Piet: Again, not relevant in relation to the sentence preceding it and already mention on Zwarte Piet and biased in its wording by seeming to project that the character is factually racists.
- 18:1118:11, 5 December 2015 diff hist +420 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 18:0818:08, 5 December 2015 diff hist +232 Zwarte Piet More accurate.
- 18:0618:06, 5 December 2015 diff hist −830 Zwarte Piet Your refusal to summarize your edit, shows to me that you are uninterested in this article being an accurate representation of the situation.I have listed my flaws with your version on the talk page many times, why do you refuse to list yours with mine?
- 18:0218:02, 5 December 2015 diff hist +948 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet →Criticism of Zwarte Piet
- 17:5717:57, 5 December 2015 diff hist −13,247 Zwarte Piet It should be clear for anyone that what I've done isn't vandalism, but rather balancing this article with highly sourced information. The information I remove with this edit is still readily available in the Criticism of Zwarte Piet-article
- 17:5517:55, 5 December 2015 diff hist +1,089 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 17:5017:50, 5 December 2015 diff hist +529 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet No edit summary
- 17:4517:45, 5 December 2015 diff hist −31 Zwarte Piet I'm removing this (dubious) category, as it would be biased to leave it in the article.
- 17:4417:44, 5 December 2015 diff hist −1 Zwarte Piet →Criticism of Zwarte Piet: 2x integral
- 17:4317:43, 5 December 2015 diff hist −14,238 Zwarte Piet Restoring to version in which criticism of the character does not dominate the page that is to be primarily descriptive. Also reading deleted sourced material and adding new information about the perception of the character, thereby creating a balance.
- 16:3516:35, 5 December 2015 diff hist −1 Ethnicity bad example, they share their language with the Dutch
- 16:1916:19, 5 December 2015 diff hist +436 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 16:1716:17, 5 December 2015 diff hist +30 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 16:1616:16, 5 December 2015 diff hist +1,771 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 16:0916:09, 5 December 2015 diff hist +194 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet adding
- 16:0416:04, 5 December 2015 diff hist +1,166 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet First of many sources
- 15:4815:48, 5 December 2015 diff hist +754 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet No edit summary
3 December 2015
- 09:0009:00, 3 December 2015 diff hist +559 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet No edit summary
- 08:5608:56, 3 December 2015 diff hist −17,198 Zwarte Piet Restoring more balanced version and added a new source on the perception of the figure by children. The information I remove here now is still available at Criticisms of Zwarte Piet
- 08:4908:49, 3 December 2015 diff hist +711 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 08:4408:44, 3 December 2015 diff hist +506 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
1 December 2015
- 12:4712:47, 1 December 2015 diff hist +721 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 12:3512:35, 1 December 2015 diff hist −741 Sinterklaas Thank you for removing the "however" but it remains a fact that the added part is vague (several, several, among...) and in any case too detailed for this summary.
- 11:3711:37, 1 December 2015 diff hist −750 Sinterklaas The word "However" suggests a correlation between two retail chains and Dutch overal public opinion. Which doesn't exist. Furthermore this kind of information should not feature in what is essentially a summary of the character.
- 11:3411:34, 1 December 2015 diff hist +679 Talk:Zwarte Piet →Creation of criticism article
- 11:2811:28, 1 December 2015 diff hist −17,544 Zwarte Piet Undid revision 693226803 by Walter Görlitz (talk) The history section is filled not with information but with critisms, an unclear blob of them in fact. This extra article is needed
30 November 2015
- 23:0823:08, 30 November 2015 diff hist −750 Sinterklaas →Zwarte Piet: not relevant in relation to the sentence preceding it and already mention on Zwarte Piet.
- 23:0523:05, 30 November 2015 diff hist −830 Zwarte Piet Shouldn't be in lead.
- 23:0523:05, 30 November 2015 diff hist −20 Zwarte Piet →21st century
- 23:0523:05, 30 November 2015 diff hist +9 Zwarte Piet →20th century
- 23:0423:04, 30 November 2015 diff hist −1,102 Zwarte Piet →20th century
- 23:0423:04, 30 November 2015 diff hist +134 Zwarte Piet →Criticism of Zwarte Piet
- 22:2122:21, 30 November 2015 diff hist −2 Zwarte Piet No edit summary
- 22:1222:12, 30 November 2015 diff hist −15,733 Zwarte Piet Moving to separate article ... the entire 21st century section is about criticism of Zwarte Piet not about history.
30 December 2014
- 20:3720:37, 30 December 2014 diff hist +13 m Rashidun Caliphate No edit summary
