Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 936494494 by StuRat (talk)
Line 185:
::::::Apparently it doesn't. That doesn't matter. It is my personal view of coffee. We could continue this discussion, but I think I have the answer I was looking for now. [[User:Freeknowledgecreator|Freeknowledgecreator]] ([[User talk:Freeknowledgecreator|talk]]) 02:46, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
:::::::It would be a common view, for convenience. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 02:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
:::::::"Coffee" is an ambiguous term, sometime referring to the beverage with nothing added, and sometimes to the drink with sugar, milk, cream, and various spices and flavorings added. If the term wasn'twere not ambiguous, it wouldn't be necessary to specifyspecific "black" coffee to get the minimalist version. [[User:NonmalignedNations|NonmalignedNations]] ([[User talk:NonmalignedNations|talk]]) 00:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 
:Tea and coffee contain essentially no [[Food calorie|calories]]. They technically do have one or two calories per cup on average, but it's impossible under any realistic scenario to consume enough for this to mean anything. Obviously if you add things to them, now you have a mixture of coffee or tea and whatever you added. --[[Special:Contributions/47.146.63.87|47.146.63.87]] ([[User talk:47.146.63.87|talk]]) 03:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)