Content deleted Content added
Fabrictramp (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 62:
You were very quick to delete this page which is being newly curated. Profiles for People is non commercial (although once, it was). Please verify this fact, by trying to discover a way to buy this "product". The PfP profiling methodology sits in a space alongside other non commercial and commerical methodologies such as [[MBTI]], and the article, had you not deleted it, would have discussed the different approaches to psychometric assessments such as the Jungian approach adopted by two unqualified fans of Karl Jung whose work somehow became MBTI, the current "go-to" assessment. PfP occupies a space with assessment methodologies that are based around behaviour rather than psychology or personality. Furthermore an API is close to public release so that anyone may create their own assessment. Contrast this with Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) which has its own wikipedia entry yet is clearly part of a business masquerading as a service to society - it charges USD 50 per assessment (https://www.mbtionline.com/TaketheMBTI). Please, if you wish to sit in judgement, then take that page down before you take down a page that represents an organisation making zero money for its service. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dakisan|Dakisan]] ([[User talk:Dakisan#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dakisan|contribs]]) 08:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Between the article and this post here, you clearly aren't able to write about this subject in a neutral point of view. Take a few minutes to read [[WP:COI]] to see why writing about this is strongly discouraged.----[[User:Fabrictramp|<span style="color: #228b22; font-family: comic sans ms;">Fabrictramp</span>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<span style="color: #960018; font-family: Papyrus;">talk to me</span>]] 03:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
== Brands more notable outside of the English speaking world ==
With regard to [[User_talk:Johan_M._Olofsson#Proposed_deletion_of_Woxter]]:
I'll have to rely on your experience. In the Spanish speaking world, I guess the criterion for notability is met if we trust [https://www.informaria.com/woxter-entre-5-principales-fabricantes-de-electronica-de-consumo-en-espana/ Grupo Informaria]; But I've no idea if that's a trustworthy source. And I know even less if that's a reason to include an article in en.wikipedia.
[[User:Johan M. Olofsson|Johan M. Olofsson]] ([[User talk:Johan M. Olofsson|talk]]) 12:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||