Content deleted Content added
Kingsindian (talk | contribs) →1RR: re, and a proposal |
Kingsindian (talk | contribs) →1RR: clarify |
||
Line 69:
"Perhaps I should collect all these absurd cases and open an ARCA request." — That is a very good idea and I'll help as I can. But ArbCom have shown a frustrating lack of interest in clarifying their own rulings. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 13:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
*Ghcool it was not his first revert so the rule doesn't apply. --[[user:Shrike|Shrike]] ([[User talk:Shrike|talk]]) 13:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
:: {{re|Zero0000}} I am a bit pressed for time now, but I'll probably open an ARCA request soon. My opinion is that it would be best to simply go back to 1RR, with no frills at all. It's simple and a bright line, which is what it should be. One cannot really handle all the game-playing that goes on in political areas with one rule. So
| |||