Wikipedia

Talk:Cliffside Malibu: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 100:
I think the expert was careful not to mention specific programs such as Cliffside Malibu because he knows it would be irresponsible to single any one out without taking the time to research it. An expert's general criticism about the cost of one school of rehab facilities could go in the article about [[Drug rehabilitation]], rather than into an article about a company not mentioned by the expert.
 
3. ''Only'' in the event it is decided to keep, instead of delete, the "facedCost criticismProhibitive" sub-section above, there is a contrary opinion fromin a Reliable Source, which should then be included as the response to the critcism as per NPOV:
 
"Taite says that patients in treatment are looking for an excuse not to stay and that the amenities provided by Cliffside remove reasons to leave."<ref>{{cite news |title=Cliffside Malibu on The Today Show |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNsbafRXLxk |accessdate=4 June 2018 |publisher=Today Show |date=1 July 2013}}</ref>
 
:3a. In the event it is decided to keep the "Cost Prohibitive" languageparagraph, please delete "Cost Prohibitive" as a sub-section and "Criticism" as a section, moving the relevant paragraph instead to start as sentence three of paragraph three of the section "Addiction Treatment" (after sentence that ends "...turndown service."), which is already about the same exact subject. Articles generally shouldn't have a separate "Criticism" section,except in special circumstances such "particular worldviews, philosophies or religious topics etc." It discourages NPOV, in conflict with basic Wikipedia policy. [[WP: CRITS]]. [[User:BC1278|BC1278]] ([[User talk:BC1278|talk]]) 23:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cliffside_Malibu"