Carsharing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Robcervero (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Robcervero (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 48:
Some carshare operations (CSOs) cooperate with local car rental firms, in particular in situations wherein classic rental may be the cheaper option.
 
Carsharing can provide numerous transportation, land use, environmental, and social benefits.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Susan A. |last=Shaheen |first2=Adam P. |last2=Cohen |first3=Mellisa S. |last3=Chung |title=North American Carsharing: 10-Year Retrospective |url= http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5k56406d?query=North%20American%20Carsharing |journal=Transportation Research Record |volume=2010 |pages=35–44 |accessdate=14 November 2015}}</ref> Neighborhood carsharing is often promoted as an alternative to owning a car where [[public transit]], walking, and [[cycling]] can be used most of the time and a car is only necessary for out-of-town trips, moving large items, or special occasions. It can also be an alternative to owning multiple cars for households with more than one driver. A long-term study of [[City CarShare]] members found that 30 percent of households that joined sold a car; others delayed purchasing one. Transit use, bicycling, and walking also increased among members.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7fn8966c?query=City%20CarShare |first=Robert |last=Cervero |authorlink=Robert Cervero|first2=Aaron |last2=Golub |first3=Brendan |last3=Nee |title=City CarShare: Longer-Term Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts |year=2007 |publisher=Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California at Berkeley |accessdate=14 November 2015}}</ref> [[City CarShare]]'s early adopters were found to be mostly non-car-owners, resulting in increased car-miles traveled one-year into the program <ref>{{cite |first=Robert |last=Cervero |authorlink=Robert Cervero|title=City CarShare: First Year Travel-Demand Impacts| journal=Transportation Research Record |volume=1839 |year=2003|pages=159–166}}</ref>; two years into the program, car-sharing began to enter the mainstream of San Francisco's traveling public, prompting many families to give up second cars<ref>{{cite |first1=Robert |last1=Cervero |authorlink=Robert Cervero|first2=Y. |last1=Tsai|title=City CarShare in San Francisco, California: Second-Year Travel Demand and Car Ownerhsip Impacts| journal=Transportation Research Record |volume=1887 |year=2004|pages=117–127}}</ref>, and by year five, nearly a third of Car-Share[[City CarShare]]'s member households had shed a private motorized vehicle.<ref>{{cite|first=Robert |last=Cervero |authorlink=Robert Cervero|first2=Aaron |last2=Golub |first3=Brendan |last3=Nee |title=City CarShare: Longer-Term Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts |year=2007 |journal=Transportation Research Record |year=2007 |volume=1992 |pages=70-90}}</ref> A study of driving behavior of members from major carsharing organizations found an average decline in 27% of annual vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT).<ref>{{cite journal|last=Shaheen|first=S.|first2=E. |last2=Martin |first3=J. |last3=Lidicker|title=Impact of Carsharing Household Vehicle Holdings |journal=Transportation Research Record |year=2010 |volume=2143 |pages=150–158|url= http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7w58646d?query=Impact%20of%20Carsharing |doi=10.3141/2143-19 |accessdate=14 November 2015}}</ref> That said, it is important to note that the success of carsharing programs depends on if it provides the consumers with "better mobility or sufficient mobility at reduced cost." <ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=http://innovativemobility.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SharedMobility_WhitePaper_FINAL.pdf|title=Shared Mobility: Definitions, Industry Developments, and Early Understanding|last=Shaheen|first=Susan|last2=Chan|first2=Nelson|date=|website=Innovative Mobility Research|access-date=|last3=Bansal|first3=Apaar|last4=Cohen|first4=Adam}}</ref>
 
Carsharing is generally not cost-effective for commuting to a full-time job on a regular basis. Most carsharing advocates, operators, and cooperating public agencies believe that those who do not drive daily or who drive less than 10,000 kilometers (about 6,200 statute miles) annually may find carsharing to be more cost-effective than car ownership.<ref>{{cite web | title=Bringing Carsharing to your Community | publisher=City Car Share |url= http://www.citycarshare.org/download/CCS_BCCtYC_Short.pdf |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110720203527/http://www.citycarshare.org/download/CCS_BCCtYC_Short.pdf |archivedate=20 July 2011 |accessdate=6 February 2016}}</ref> But variations of 50% on this figure are reported by operators and others depending on local context.{{Citation needed|date=July 2008}} If occasional use of a shared vehicle costs significantly less than car ownership, then carsharing makes automobile use more accessible to low-income households.