Revision as of 23:11, 30 September 2015 edit Andrewaskew (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,306 edits →‎Defining "cereologists": Changed my "vote." ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:26, 6 October 2015 edit undo 5.69.58.27 (talk) →‎Should read: "crop mark" not "crop formation" Next edit →
Line 340: Should read: ''"crop mark"'' not "crop formation" for-fecks-fecking-sake! <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.197.67.131\|90.197.67.131]] ([[User talk:90.197.67.131\|talk]]) 10:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> : Feel free to provide sources for that change. <b>[[User Talk:JzG\|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help\|Help!]])</small> 10:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Thanks for reply. ''"Crop Mark"'' has an history - google ngram and google books would prob prove this. Never heard of: ''"crop formation"'' until this wiki article. Also, not all crop circles are circular, right? - this is another feather in the bow of crop mark. By the way, whatever happened to ''"crop ring"'' ? Sigh. == Defining "cereologists" ==

Talk:Crop circle: Difference between revisions