Revision as of 14:36, 11 July 2015 edit Paul Barlow (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers 93,539 edits →‎Evidence of hoax/forgery? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:52, 11 July 2015 edit undo Paul Barlow (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers 93,539 edits m →‎Evidence of hoax/forgery? Next edit →
Line 141: ::There are many highly respectable people calling [[the Bible]] a hoax. Do we slander that page with hoax labels? This is very POV. [[User:Prinsgezinde\|Bataaf van Oranje]] ([[User talk:Prinsgezinde\|talk]]) 13:23, 11 July 2015 (UTC) :::We go by what the sources say. Sources that clearly meet [[WP:RS]] refer to this as a hoax. What would break our [[WP:NPOV]] policy is not making clear that the mainstream considers it a hoax. Note that words such as 'slander' have legal implications and shouldn't be used, see [[WP:NLT]]. [[User:Doug Weller\|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Doug Weller\|talk]]) 14:04, 11 July 2015 (UTC) :::I know of no "respectable people" who have said that the bible is a hoax. Almost ~~everry~~every qualified scholar says that this is. [[User:Paul Barlow\|Paul B]] ([[User talk:Paul Barlow\|talk]]) 14:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC) ==Intro==

Talk:Oera Linda Book: Difference between revisions