Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 103:
* another example of [[paranoia]]: I have no idea who this ancient account Bosnipidian is that I'm accused of been associated with, and no one else seems to know either. Still, some are misusing that ancient case [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bosnipedian&action=history '''of 5 years ago'''] which supports my thesis this was a [[paranoia]]-based [[lynching]] sort of speak, demonstrating bad faith.
[[User:Overdtop|Overdtop]] ([[User talk:Overdtop#top|talk]]) 22:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)|decline=Unblock requests that contain personal attacks are not considered. [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 01:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|reason=This was a bad-faith block since:
* [[User:Overdtop|I was '''permanently''' blocked]] in a record-breaking time while the case is '''still open''' so that I couldn't respond in the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bosnipedian#Comments_by_other_users|appropriate section]] of the case notice ("[[Catch-22_(logic)|catch 22]]")
* this is only my second block ever
* the only previous block was actually a mildest warning-block (for 31 hrs)
* the permanent block came right after the mildest one
* even the first block has been made in a record-breaking time so to prevent me from participating in the blocking-noticeboard discussion on a report I filed against another user for [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive262#User:Thomas.W_reported_by_User:Overdtop_.28Result:_No_violation--at_least_not_by_Thomas.W_.2C_Overdtop_blocked_for_personal_attack.29|sockpuppetry for evading 3RR]] (I wanted to counter the lie in that discussion (which said that no one supported my edits) by stating the fact that [[User:Sabahudin9]] stated that ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Republika_Srpska&diff=634398668&oldid=633875777 "'''''Everything that user "Overdtop" added, removed or changed was sourced"'''''])
* the above repetition of speediness supports the bad faith point
* a relevant example of bad faith: in the [[Bosnia and Herzegovina]] article, that country's regime is stated as "Federal parliamentary republic" but '''without citing sources'''. However when I provided a [[Peace Magazine|highly reliable source]] stating the country's regime as an international [[protectorate]], namely a review of a highly reliable book edited by a distinguished Canadian professor and published by a highly reputable publisher [[Elsevier]], I was sacked. Note there are many more reliable sources that call Bosnia and Herzegovina a protectorate, and from what I can tell no reference at all that calls it a "federal parliamentary republic"; see [[Talk:Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#Calling_of_Bosnia_and_Herzgovina.27s_government|this Talk discussion on that]]. According to its current rules, Wikipedia is supposed to state facts
* another example of bad faith: I have no idea who this ancient account Bosnipidian is that I'm accused of been associated with, and no one else seems to know either. Still, some are misusing that ancient case [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bosnipedian&action=history '''of 5 years ago''']. [[User:Overdtop|Overdtop]] ([[User talk:Overdtop#top|talk]]) 16:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)}}
|