Content deleted Content added
Line 72:
*'''Oppose''' - While I do completely understand any frustration or disagreement over the context of the move, the actual action does make sense. It is not clear, either from common conversational usage or from reliable sourcing, that the subject in question is the primary topic over modern day societies, orders of merit, or the concept of order as a command or law, all of which we also have pages for.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 16:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' the revert. This is much less confusing. See my comment above. I am also confused about "without discussion" part. I proposed to create disambiguation page in March and for half a year there was no opposition, it is a reasonable to assume that this is such noncontroversial move that nobody feels like talking about it. --[[User:Jarekt|Jarekt]] ([[User talk:Jarekt|talk]]) 18:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' the disambiguation page should be moved to the plain location. If there were a primary topic, it would not be this one, it would be [[Order (honour)]] instead. The primary meaning is also not this one, bur rather a command order issued by military authorities. -- [[Special:Contributions/65.94.171.225|65.94.171.225]] ([[User talk:65.94.171.225|talk]]) 05:12, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
| |||