Revision as of 20:22, 14 September 2014 edit Jrtayloriv (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 17,855 edits →‎RFC: Can reliably sourced content be removed without any explanation? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:23, 14 September 2014 edit undo Jrtayloriv (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 17,855 edits →‎RFC: Can reliably sourced content be removed without any explanation? Next edit →
Line 89: Should reliably sourced content be removed from the lead of this article with no justification? -- [[User:Jrtayloriv\|Jrtayloriv]] ([[User talk:Jrtayloriv\|talk]]) 20:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC) :See the discussion above. User Jytdog originally removed the content, claiming that it was a copyvio. After demonstrating to them that it clearly wasn't a copyvio (in fact, the article they linked to was violating copyright by using WP content without attribution), they then refused to restore the content anyway and are refusing to provide a justification for why they want the content removed. I think that now that their original justification for removal has been shown to be baseless, they needs to provide a valid justification for its removal, or restore the content. -- [[User:Jrtayloriv\|Jrtayloriv]] ([[User talk:Jrtayloriv\|talk]]) 20:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)▼ This is the wrong question and is premature. In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agent_Orange&diff=625483189&oldid=625412626 a series of 4 edits], the OP basically reverted the article to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agent_Orange&oldid=566333715 an old version], without edit notes or discussion on Talk, and is refusing to discuss the details. There are many issues re-introduced that had been fixed. [[User:Jytdog\|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog\|talk]]) 20:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)▼ ▲*This is the wrong question and is premature. In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agent_Orange&diff=625483189&oldid=625412626 a series of 4 edits], the OP basically reverted the article to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agent_Orange&oldid=566333715 an old version], without edit notes or discussion on Talk, and is refusing to discuss the details. There are many issues re-introduced that had been fixed. [[User:Jytdog\|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog\|talk]]) 20:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC) ▲:See the discussion above. User Jytdog originally removed the content, claiming that it was a copyvio. After demonstrating to them that it clearly wasn't a copyvio (in fact, the article they linked to was violating copyright by using WP content without attribution), they then refused to restore the content anyway and are refusing to provide a justification for why they want the content removed. I think that now that their original justification for removal has been shown to be baseless, they needs to provide a valid justification for its removal, or restore the content. -- [[User:Jrtayloriv\|Jrtayloriv]] ([[User talk:Jrtayloriv\|talk]]) 20:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC) ::~~Additionally their~~These claims that I "basically reverted to" an older revision is clearly false, as anyone can see from the edit history. This kind of dishonesty and refusal to explain the removal of reliably sourced content, even after repeated requests, is precisely why this RFC is not "premature". I don't want to edit war with this person, and would like someone else to try to extract from them their motives for removing the content. -- [[User:Jrtayloriv\|Jrtayloriv]] ([[User talk:Jrtayloriv\|talk]]) 20:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Agent Orange: Difference between revisions