Content deleted Content added
Brookie (talk | contribs)
JonoL (talk | contribs)
m Edited, sorry too emotional
Line 329:
:GW in your user name! [[User:Brookie|Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp !]] [[User talk:Brookie|<sup>(Whisper...)</sup>]] 09:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== IGreg am insultedWain ==
 
WhyI respect that it's your job to be an administrator, but why did you delete the page 'Greg Wain'.? QuiteThis clearlyhas ITupset WASme NOT A VANITY PAGE. I am so upset,as I provided a justification for the page in the discussion. DIDI YOUfound EVENthe READarticle THEto DISCUSSIONbe PAGE?deleted ANDimproperly I(IMHO) checkedand thewithout criteriaany forrationale vanity pagesgiven, andwhich theis 'Grega Waindouble WP:BITE problem. Besides, don't pagewe failedhave toWP-wide quality.consensus that Headmasters are notable?
 
Regards [[User:JonoL|JonoL]] 09:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
You are so rude, you WikiAdministrators think you have some divine right. You really didn't show me ANY decency because you simply authorised the deletion of the page. I find that incredibly indecent. [[User:JonoL|JonoL]] 08:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 
:I don't know who you are or why you are "insulted"! You only appear once on the edit history of that article. As Mr Wain started his own article it was clearly vanity; as it did not establish notability it was deleted and userfied - seems fine to me. You need some fresh air and a long walk! --[[User:Brookie|Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp !]] [[User talk:Brookie|<sup>(Whisper...)</sup>]] 09:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)