Revision as of 19:57, 20 September 2013 edit TTN (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 58,138 edits Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:49, 21 September 2013 edit undo Claritas (talk \| contribs) 7,095 edits delete Next edit →
Line 15: '''Keep''' per the reasoning of [[User:DGG\| DGG]]. --[[User:Mark viking\|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking\|talk]]) 19:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC) :What reasoning? He misidentified the official D&D resources as secondary, and the rest is just nitpicking at the wording of my rational. The article does not satisfy [[WP:N]] at this point. [[User:TTN\|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN\|talk]]) 19:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - as always with these articles, not a single [[WP:RS\|independent secondary source]] so we can't [[WP:NRVE\|verify notability]]. Not a single argument for keeping the article is policy based. I will change my vote to keep immediately if an editor can find a reliable independent secondary source which discusses the topic of "Luthic" in depth. --[[User talk:Claritas\|Simone]] 09:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luthic: Difference between revisions