Content deleted Content added
Youreallycan (talk | contribs)
reply to Drmies
Line 180:
::YRC, note that you can still revert vandalism and BLP violations, but I think you need to learn to communicate more effectively with your fellow editors in the BLP area more, basically that you get more of a mindset that this is really a collaborative project and that there are plenty of other editors here who care just as much as you about any particular BLP. If you have that mindset, then it doesn't matter who exactly reverts what BLP violation. Once you have that mindset, you will be a lot less angry when someone reinserts a BLP violation that you reverted. That anger you had from time to time here caused you to behave in an incivil way toward other editors (not just those who inserted the alledged BLP violations in articles). Count Iblis (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
*Rob, it's not looking so great right now, but things may change for the better. If they do, oviously you'll have to be a good boy. I wish you could accept the 1R restriction. You ''know'' that there are always ways to get help after a first revert in some urgent case--I'm one, and Writ Keeper is another, and there's plenty more. Accepting ''that'' might swing some votes. Not that we're voting. As for the queer agenda--I don't think I ever met Russavia, but I think that you and I have often gotten along, and I may well have a queer agenda myself (or, if I did, I'd be proud of it). But that sort of comment is off-limits, of course. Take it easy, and good luck, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 01:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
:Ah, ok. Yes I can easily accept a blanket one revert condition. I think I misunderstood the request. <font color="purple">[[User:Youreallycan|You]]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">[[User talk:Youreallycan|can]]</font> 04:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 
== Greetings ==