Talk:Nicolaus Copernicus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 818:
This article has been hounded by nationalist disputes for many years with probably Megabytes of pure discussion on the talk page. These wars slowly decreased and for three years the article was almost free of these petty wars and a version that was accepted by both sides became stable. In February however, the account [[User:Astronomer28]] wrote a new version of the nationality section and seeks to establish his new version with reverting, arguing that it was shorter. I believe that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicolaus_Copernicus&diff=545435364&oldid=545375734 his version] seeks to misrepresent the entire dispute, removes reliable sources and is intentionally biased. He claimed that only his version would be NPOV [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicolaus_Copernicus&diff=prev&oldid=545795191] "because the NPOV is that he was Polish" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nicolaus_Copernicus&diff=prev&oldid=545794959]. The Copernicus article was a good article nominee with a more elaborate nationality section. In my opinion the previous version of the section should continue to be used or be modified without attempts to advance a POV. --'''''[[User:Walkee|walkee]]'''''<sup><font color="#009900">[[User_talk:Walkee|talkee]]</font></sup> 19:01, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
*Even though I am not involved in this dispute at all, I would obviously '''support''' the previous version per Walkee. The core fundamental policy we must keep in mind is [[WP:NPOV]]. [[User:Sjones23|Lord Sjones23]] ([[User talk:Sjones23|talk]] - [[User:Sjones23/Wikipedia contributions|contributions]]) 19:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
*I think the longer version is preferable, although it can use expansion from other sources. I plan on adding refs from [[Polski Słownik Biograficzny]] in a near future. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 06:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:I am not against a longer version, but not in this Wikipedia entry. I am also definitely not advancing a POV. Please see my post above with references to encyclopedias, popular books and textbooks. I don't think I could find a single one that mentioned any nationality dispute, which however is sometimes mentioned in very history-specific books. In other words, everything else about Copernicus is much more important. IMO the debate is also important, but I propose putting it in a separate article as previously proposed by Walkee and Nihil novi. [[User:Astronomer28|Astronomer28]] ([[User talk:Astronomer28|talk]]) 09:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)