Talk:Mark Kelly: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Mlm42 (talk | contribs)
→‎Requested move: which searches?
Mlm42 (talk | contribs)
→‎Requested move: modify comment
Line 254:
:'''Support''': [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]] says that the term "Mark Kelly" referring to the astronaut would have to be "''more likely than all the other topics combined''". I've glanced through the page views of the Mark Kelly's, and while I agree that the astronaut is currently getting more page views than the others combined.. his page views really go it bursts. But even discounting the bursts (presumably due to linking from the main page, or media activity), his baseline seems to be about 150-300 hits per day. The keyboardist is about 80 per day, and the others are about 10 per day or less. So even by discounting his bursts of interest, I would say he's the primary topic. A google searches also seem to heavily favour him. Powers' statement is not an argument against moving the page. Whatever the reason, the astronaut has been the primary topic for over a year, and is likely to remain so until another more famous "Mark Kelly" comes along... Is Powers suggesting the keyboardist will have a surge in popularity? [[User:Mlm42|Mlm42]] ([[User talk:Mlm42|talk]]) 11:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' [[WP:RECENT]], local to US, and not "''more likely than all the other topics combined''" in Google Books. [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 04:51, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
::What search in Google books did you use? IThere couldn'twere findvery anymany Mark Kelly's otherin thanmy Google Book searches, but the majority were for the astronaut.. withlook mymore Googleclosely Bookat searches.the results, or show us your search. [[User:Mlm42|Mlm42]] ([[User talk:Mlm42|talk]]) 10:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)