Content deleted Content added
Line 341:
::::::Well, referring to an article which is presumably written by a banned user is, umm, a very questionable strategy if you are a sock of that same user. A [[WP:SPI]] would be in order, of course, and would be not too difficult, as the potential sock puppeteer is already identified. The potential benefit of tricking some user into revealing more than he or she wants to do does not outweigh the damage that may result if other users are being led to follow a misleading interpretation of actual Wikipedia policies. <span style="border:1px solid;color:#000085">[[User talk:Cs32en|<font style="color:#000085;"> '''Cs32en''' </font>]]</span> 01:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I guess this turned out to be discussion about torture after all, there is not much information about expulsion of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act#Lone_wolf_amendment subject], was he removed by the USDHS? Well, after this interesting exchange I'll admit I'm deeply concerned for my privacy, therefore I'm definitely done with editing Wikka-wakka, have fun, [[User:InnerParty|InnerParty]] ([[User talk:InnerParty|talk]]) 09:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Wow, it's devastating for the project to lose an editor of your caliber. [[User:Ice Cold Beer|Ice Cold Beer]] ([[User talk:Ice Cold Beer|talk]]) 07:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Should I even bother with a sock check? I mean honestly, he made it far too easy this time, especially considering this 'new editor' appeared directly after the last sock was blocked. I would say that this "I suddenly agree with everything you guys say" approach was interesting, but really, this is just tedious. I had my doubts from the very first edit. Can someone else put in the request this time? --[[User:Tarage|Tarage]] ([[User talk:Tarage|talk]]) 10:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||