Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Scientology/Evidence: Difference between revisions

The arbcom is composed of intelligent people that will see through these silly attempt to hijack this arbcom case. The case is about, ahem, "Scientology" and editors that have edited these article and that does not include me. So please, spare us the wikilawyering and get on with proving evidence that is pertinent and useful. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 04:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

:Thank you, Jossi. I agree with your estimate of ArbCom's intelligence. With that avowal, do you also intend to withdraw your workshop proposals that expand the scope of this case to BLP and all new religious movements? <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font>^{''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''} 04:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)