Revision as of 17:59, 23 January 2008 edit Fish and karate (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 36,439 edits →Fine: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:52, 24 January 2008 edit undo Reginmund (talk \| contribs) 5,142 edits →Blocked Next edit →
Line 472: :::::Three months is still excessive. One month was excessive before. Given the repeat violations documented here, 2 weeks might be appropriate. 3 months is way out of whack, though. --[[User:B\|B]] ([[User talk:B\|talk]]) 01:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC) :I hate to jump in this fray, but I have to say - three months is seriously out of calibration with the community, I think. I strongly recommend that you consider reducing this block. - [[User:Philippe\|Philippe]] \| [[User talk:Philippe\|Talk]] 03:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC) ::This is his 5th block for edit warring, not just on the Chris Crocker article. I'd say it's quite appropriate. Directly, myself and numerous other users have tried to work out his Crocker content issues via the article's talk page but he's hell-bent on making sure the article is his way and no other way. Everytime the Crocker article comes off of protection, he's right there to remove the very same content he opposes. This is disruption of Wikipedia and he should also read up on [[WP:OWN]] because it's as if he's stalking the Crocker article just waiting for his opportunity. <font size="+2" color="red">✰</font><strong style="letter-spacing:1px;font-family:Verdana">[[User:Allstarecho\|ALLSTAR]]</strong><font size="+2" color="red">✰</font> <sup><small>[[User_talk:Allstarecho\|echo]]</small></sup> 04:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC) :Reginmund, if you will promise to stop edit-warring (on any article, not just the Chris Cocker article), I will - against my better judgement - reduce the block to a month. [[User:Neil\|<u style="text-decoration:none;font:100% cursive;color:#060">Neıl</u>]] [[User_talk:Neil\|<u style="text-decoration:none;color:#060">☎</u>]] 08:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Reginmund