Content deleted Content added
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) m Automated archival of 2 sections from User talk:Sr13 |
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) m Automated archival of 5 sections from User talk:Sr13 |
||
Line 99:
Thanks for deleting my spelling mistake, however do you know why it is still showing up (along with my correct category spelling) as a subcategory of Category:Privately held companies? [[User:Jauerback|Jauerback]] 17:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
: Never mind. It went away. [[User:Jauerback|Jauerback]] 17:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63308932568" />
==Thanks!==
Yep thanks for helping me resolve that weird edit and tagging on the user page (unique vandalism technique i guess), and offering to speaking to that guy (whose userpage user boxes also seem to be copied from mine) =p.
-[[User:Advanced|Advanced]] 06:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63308947088" />
==[[Wikipedia:Changing usernames]]==
Thanks for helping out on the clerking here. Just one thing - I have long been worried about editcountitis creeping in to that process - the generally idea is that any user should be able to request a rename regardless of their edit count. Clearly if they have never edited or only vandalised that's one thing, but the crats have on several occasions rejected any stricter criteria. In particular where usernames are created with typos/wrong capitalisation, the user creation software won't allow a new account (as its name will be too similar to an existing account) making renames the only option for those users. Bear in mind that renaming users with very few edits puts very little load on the servers (think of it like deleting articles creating a load equivalent to the number of revisions) so the sooner renames are done, the better from the server's point of view. Doing these requests is a good way to be friendly to new users and objecting on low edit count grounds can be a little bite-y. It doesn't really take crats any more time to do the requests than to reject them. Anyway, just my thought on the matter... <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 10:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63308949188" />
== Punktastic Recordings ==
This was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Punktastic_Recordings&action=history closed] by you as delete, but the article exists. [[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] 11:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63308984048" />
== Clerking at WP:CHU ==
Hi SR13, Your helping out at WP:CHU is most welcome, but I think it would be halpful if you bone up on policy a bit more before engaging the requesters. Perhaps you could run some of your questions past WjBscribe. Thanks, [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] 20:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
:Perhaps I rushed on those requests; I'll forward any queries when necessary. '''[[User:Sr13|Sr]][[User talk:Sr13|13]]''' 20:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63308986208" />
== [[Roland Aranjo]] ==
I'm no political expert so can you check out [[Roland Aranjo]]? It seems to be written by the person himself so I put a <nowiki>{{coi}}</nowiki> on it and notified him about it, but now I'm wondering if this isn't just pure promotional stuff. -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 21:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
:Okay, thanks. :) I was a bit unsure at first so decided to play it safe, but then I checked around, notice all links to his page were ones he made, and started getting suspicious. I should probably look at legit political articles so I know better next time something comes along. Anyways, thanks again! -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 21:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||