Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Final report: This is not a complete sentence.
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{What}}
Line 254:
{{Blockquote|text=The BEA globally agrees with the analysis of the crew performance for phases 4 and 5 of the accident scenario. However, the BEA considers that some aspects of the analysis of the crew performance in the first phases of the flight are insufficiently developed and could improve the understanding of what could have been done by the crew which could have modified the outcome of the flight.}}The report continues in documenting the pilots' errors:<ref name=":3" />
{{Blockquote|text=During the accident flight, the flight crew did not make appropriate use of the
associated applicable procedures on which he [sic] had received training in the preceding months.}}{{Blockquote|text=The Captain's attempts to engage AP was in contradiction with the Approach to Stall or Stall Recovery maneuver check list, which was expected to be applied in reaction to the stick shaker activation.}}{{Blockquote|text=Degradation of the CRM which started immediately after the AOA vane failure and which didn't help the crew take the necessary actions to keep the plane under control although they had received an adequate recurrent training on situations that occurred in the accident flight.{{what|date=October 2024}}}}
 
== Reactions to the investigation ==