Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Chen: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
please remember to keep the discussion focused on wikipedia policies
Line 60:
:100% Keep so far and the [[Dmitry Kiselyov|extended]] [[Russo-Ukrainian War|circumstances]] of this RfD also suggest it is not a bad idea to check the nominator's log for bad-faith editing activity. 5 ct and ''Doppleganger'' says we are dealing with a network here whose mission includes targeted falsification of trusted public sources. Calling such people and their helpers "sworn enemies of Wikipedia and all it stands for" is not ''that'' much too dramatically un-encyclopedic, and, sadly, "aiders and abetters of severe crimes against humanity" looks like it is a factual description of Tenet and their influencer portfolio. Vigilance is thus advised: Wikipedia should not be like Tim Pool and freely waive its due diligence here. [[User:Dysmorodrepanis2|Dysmorodrepanis2]] ([[User talk:Dysmorodrepanis2|talk]]) 18:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Dysmorodrepanis2|Dysmorodrepanis2]], {{tq|the extended circumstances of this RfD also suggest it is not a bad idea to check the nominator's log for bad-faith editing activity.}} is an outrageous personal attack on an active new page patroller who is quite familiar with the guidelines for deletion discussions. Please remember to [[WP:AGF]], thank you. -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 21:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': there are a lot of keep !votes on this AfD but few engage seriously with wikipedia policies or the concerns of the nominator. Those arguing for keep, if you could address issues of [[WP:BLP1E]] and [[WP:CRIME]], that would be very helpful. It is very obvious that we will be covering Lauren Chen on wikipedia ''somewhere''. The question at hand is whether it is appropriate to have a standalone biography for her, given the [[WP:BLP]] concerns. -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 21:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)