Content deleted Content added
→Templates removed: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 65:
· Scott M. Hyslop, "James Kibbie's Bach Adventure", The American Organist
· Brooks Grantier, "Building Bach: His Foundations and Futures", The Diapason [[User:Montre8|Montre8]] ([[User talk:Montre8|talk]]) 19:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
: {{u|Montre8}}, on just a quick skim on your point 1 above, the criteria of being {{tq|the subject of non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician}} is clearly not met in all the examples you have given. [https://www.michigandaily.com/news/campus-life/university-researchers-examine-how-data-science-can-interpret-music/ Taylor] is not independent as it is an interview with the subject; [https://www.michigandaily.com/news/campus-life/university-researchers-examine-how-data-science-can-interpret-music/ Meisler] is neither independent (interview) nor non-trivial coverage of the person (Kibble is mentioned once), [https://www.thediapason.com/content/conversation-james-kibbie Robinson] is an interview with the subject and so by definition not independent and [https://www.thediapason.com/content/building-bach-his-foundations-and-futures-university-michigan-59th-annual-organ-conference Grantier] is trivial coverage. More importantly, given your only edits to wikipedia over 12+ years have been to this article and to add Kibbie's name to other articles, what is your connection to the subject and have you abided by wikipedia's [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] guidelines? Thank you [[User:Melcous|Melcous]] ([[User talk:Melcous|talk]]) 22:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||