Pre-Code Hollywood: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Creation of the Code and its contents: Adding/improving reference(s)
→‎Creation of the Code and its contents: Adding/improving reference(s)
Line 28:
 
[[File:Joan Blondell banned 1932 publicity photo.jpg|thumb|This 1932 promotional photo of [[Joan Blondell]] was later banned under the then-unenforceable [[Motion Picture Production Code]].]]
The Code sought not only to determine what could be portrayed on screen, but also to promote traditional values.<ref>{{sfn|Butters, Jr, .|2007|p. =188.</ref>}} Sexual relations outside of marriage could not be portrayed as attractive and beautiful, presented in a way that might arouse passion or be made to seem right and permissible.<ref name="LaSalle"/> All criminal action had to be punished, and neither the crime nor the criminal could elicit sympathy from the audience.<ref name="ah"/> Authority figures had to be treated respectfully, and the clergy could not be portrayed as comic characters or villains. Under some circumstances, politicians, police officers and judges could be villains, as long as it was clear that they were the exception to the rule.<ref name="LaSalle"/>
 
The entire document contained Catholic undertones and stated that art must be handled carefully because it could be "morally evil in its effects" and because its "deep moral significance" was unquestionable.{{sfn|Doherty|1999|p=7}} The Catholic influence on the Code was initially kept secret, owing to the [[Anti-Catholicism in the United States|Anti-Catholic bias]] of the time.<ref name="Bl43">Black, p. 43.</ref> A recurring theme was "throughout, the audience feels sure that evil is wrong and good is right."<ref name="ah"/> The Code contained an addendum, commonly referred to as the Advertising Code, that regulated film advertising copy and imagery.{{sfn|Doherty|1999|p=107}}