History of psychopathy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 94.255.152.53 (talk) to last revision by Josve05a
K00B8 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 66:
 
Nevertheless, one author referred to the concept of psychopathy in 1987 as an "infinitely elastic, catch-all category".<ref name=lust>
{{Cite book | last = Cameron | first = Deborah | title = The Lust to Kill | publisher = New York University Press | location = Washington Square, NY | year = 1987 | pages = [https://archive.org/details/lusttokillfemini0000came/page/87 87–94] | isbn = 978-0-8147-1408-9 | url = https://archive.org/details/lusttokillfemini0000came/page/87 }}</ref> In 1988, psychologist Blackburn wrote in the ''[[British Journal of Psychiatry]]'' that as commonly used in psychiatry it is little more than a [[moral judgment]] masquerading as a clinical diagnosis, and should be scrapped.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Blackburn|first=R.|title=On moral judgements and personality disorders. The myth of psychopathic personality revisited|journal=The British Journal of Psychiatry|year=1988|volume=153|issue=4|pages=505–12|doi=10.1192/bjp.153.4.505|pmid=3074857|s2cid=4649009 |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/BLAOMJ-2}}</ref> Ellard argued similarly in the same year in the ''[[Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry]]'', describing the concept as 'a reflection of the customs and prejudices of a particular social group. Most psychiatrists are from that group and therefore fail to see the incongruity.'<ref>{{cite journal|last=Ellard|first=J|title=The history and present status of moral insanity|journal=The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry|date=December 1988|volume=22|issue=4|pages=383–9|pmid=3071321|doi=10.3109/00048678809161346|s2cid=7538868}}</ref> By the 1970s and 80s the [[sexual psychopath]] laws were falling out of favor in many states; the [[Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry]] called them a failure based on a confusing label mixing law and psychiatry.<ref>Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry. (1977). [https://books.google.com/books?id=SdJKAQAAIAAJ&q=f Psychiatry and sex psychopath legislation, the 30s to the 80s]. New York: Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry. Cf [http://isp.sagepub.com/content/25/2/144.extract Review by Louis Freed]</ref>
 
Hare redrafted his checklist in 1985 (Cleckley had died in 1984), renaming it the [[Hare Psychopathy Checklist]] Revised and finalising it as a first edition in 1991, updated with extra data in a 2nd edition in 2003. Hare's list differed from Cleckley's not just in rewordings and introducing quantitative scores for each point. Cleckley had required an absence of delusions and an absence of nervousness, which was central to how he defined psychopathy, whereas neither were mentioned in Hare's list. Hare also left out mention of suicidality being rarely completed and behavior with alcohol. Moreover, while Cleckley only listed "inadequately motivated antisocial behavior", Hare turned this into an array of specific antisocial behaviors covering a person's whole life, including juvenile delinquency, parasitic lifestyle, poor behavioural controls, and criminal versatility.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=NBC0jOMVmIYC Thinking about Psychopaths and Psychopathy: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions] "What are the differences between the psychopathy definitions designed by Hare and by Cleckley?" Editor: Ellsworth Lapham Fersch. iUniverse, 30 Oct 2006</ref> Blackburn has noted that overall Hare's checklist is closer to the criminological concept of the McCords than that of Cleckley.<ref name=Blackburn2005>[https://books.google.com/books?id=clrGnwE8mrIC Handbook of Personology and Psychopathology] Stephen Strack, John Wiley & Sons, 21 Jan 2005. Chapter 15: Psychopathy as a Personality Construct (Ronald Blackburn).</ref> Hare himself, while noting his promotion of Cleckley's work for four decades, would subsequently distance himself from it to some extent.<ref name="HareNeumann2008">{{cite journal |doi=10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452 |title=Psychopathy as a Clinical and Empirical Construct |year=2008 |last1=Hare |first1=Robert D. |last2=Neumann |first2=Craig S. |journal=Annual Review of Clinical Psychology |volume=4 |pages=217–46 |pmid=18370617|url=http://www.hare.org/references/HareandNeumannARCP2008.pdf}}</ref>