Michel Tournier: Le Coq de bruyère: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 11:
Bell argued that the book may better serve a "cultivated non-specialist" trying to learn about Tournier while it would frustrate an undergraduate student.<ref>Bel, p. 216.</ref>
 
[[Michael Worton]] of [[University College London]] wrote that he liked how the book "foregrounds" discussion of linguistic play while also addressing the author's sense of humor. Worton stated that he had hoped that Redfern would have clarified whether ''The Fetishist''<!--Using the volume's English title--> was a book with an overarching theme<!--Source text: "[...]Or is it a volume in its own right[...]"--> or if it was simply a collection of stories.<ref name=Wortonp105/>
 
==References==
* {{cite journal|last=Bell|first=Sheila M.|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004724419702700207?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.1|title=Review Essay : The challenge of Tournier: Michel Tournier: 'Le Coq de bruyère'. By Walter Redfern. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press; London: Associated University Presses, 1996. Pp. 138. H/b £23.00. Michel Tournier. Edited by Michael Worton. (Modern Literatures in Perspective). London and New York: Longman, 1995. Pp. 220. H/b £45.00. Michel Tournier. By David Gascoigne. (New Directions in European Writing). Oxford and Washington, D.C.: Berg, 1996. Pp. 234. P/b £17.95|journal=[[Journal of European Studies]]|date=June 1997|volume=27|issue=2|pages=213-224|doi=10.1177/004724419702700207}}
* {{cite journal|last=Worton|first=Michael|author-link=Michael Worton|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/263994|title=Michel Tournier: “Le coq de bruyère.”|journal=[[L'Esprit Créateur]]|date=December 1996|volume=36|issue=4|pages=104-105|via=[[Project MUSE]]|doi=10.1353/esp.0.0108}}
 
===Notes===