Content deleted Content added
Writ Keeper (talk | contribs) →Consensus of wrongful conviction?: fun when people say the quiet part out loud |
|||
Line 98:
::::I suspect part of the answer is, he was a rich man found to be guilty by a jury of his peers beyond a reasonable doubt. He had the resources to defend himself properly and he used them, but was still found guilty at his trial.
::::I suspect the other part of the answer is, he was a Jewish man that was lynched and the historians who are asked about this are either Jewish themselves and find his lynching abhorrent for that reason, or they are non-Jewish and are afraid of being labelled anti-Semitic if the say they think he was guilty. Either way, they come to the conclusion that Leo Frank was actually innocent, potentially without actually believing this. [[Special:Contributions/2603:7080:402:D900:8F1:B239:2FA8:1095|2603:7080:402:D900:8F1:B239:2FA8:1095]] ([[User talk:2603:7080:402:D900:8F1:B239:2FA8:1095|talk]]) 00:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::You're really telling on yourself when you assume that "being Jewish" is the only reason someone could find the lynching of a Jewish person abhorrent. [[User:Writ Keeper|Writ Keeper]] [[User Talk: Writ Keeper|⚇]][[Special:Contributions/Writ_Keeper|♔]] 00:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
| |||