Christianity in Gaul: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Wamome (talk | contribs)
m Removed double spaces throughout article for consistency
Line 1:
{{Copy edit|for=style and neutrality|date=October 2023}}
'''Gaul''' was an important early center of [[Latin Christianity]] during [[late antiquity]] and the [[Merovingian period]].
By the middle of the 3rd century, there were several churches organized in [[Roman Gaul]], and soon after the cessation of persecution, the bishops of the Latin world assembled at Arles, in AD 314.
The Church of Gaul passed through three crises in the late Roman period, [[Arianism]], [[Priscillianism]] and [[Pelagianism]].
Under [[Francia|Merovingian rule]], a number of "[[Frankish synods]]" were held, marking a particularly Germanic development in the Western Church.
Line 77:
Gradually the necessities of life imposed a policy of moderation. The [[Council of Agde]], really a national council of Visigothic Gaul (506), and in which Caesarius was dominant, is an evidence of the new temper on both sides. The Acts of this council follow very closely the principles laid down in the ''[[Breviarium Alarici]]''—a summary of the Theodocian Code drawn up by [[Alaric II]], the Visigothic king, for his Gallo-Roman subjects—and met with the approval of the Catholic bishops of his kingdom.
 
Between 410 and 413 the Burgundians had settled near Mains and were settled in Savoy in 443. In 475 they moved farther south along the Rhône, and about this time became Arian Christians. The Franks, soon to be masters of all Gaul, left the neighbourhood of Tournai, defeated [[Syagrius]], the last representative of Roman authority in central north Gaul, in 486, and extended their power to the Loire. In 507 they defeated the Visigoth Kingdom in the [[Battle of Vouillé]], confining their domain to Spain, except for a strip of territory along the Mediterranean coast. In 534 the Burgundians were defeated; in 536 by the conquest of Arles they succeeded to the remnants of the great state created by King [[Theodoric the Great]].
 
The transition from one regime to another was eased by the bishops of Gaul. The bishops had frequently played a role as intermediaries with the Roman authorities. It was long believed that they had been invested with special powers and the official title of ''defensores civitatum'' (defenders of the states). While this title was never officially borne by them, the popular error was only formal and superficial.
Line 90:
They also indicate a growing congruence between church and state. While Arian rulers kept their distance from the general councils, Visigoth rulers began influencing the councils only after the conversion of [[Reccared I]]. As soon as they had established themselves, Merovingian kings (and the Carolingians after them) exerted their influence on the councils.<ref>Rahner, Karl (1975). Encyclopedia of theology: a concise Sacramentum mundi, 301f.</ref> According to Gregory Halfond, such congruence was a particular quality of the Gallo-Roman church, in which the Roman aristocracy made up an important part of the leadership of the Gallo-Roman (and later the Frankish) church; continuity in this power nexus is indicated also by the continued use of Roman procedures in the councils.<ref>Halfond, Gregory I. (2009). ''Archaeology of Frankish Church Councils, AD 511-768'', pp. 4-6.</ref>
 
An early important churchman is [[Caesarius of Arles]], who organized regional synods, which were mostly concerned with conforming the canons and practices of the Church of Gaul to those of other Churches. At Orange, for instance, he had earlier ([[Pelagianism|Pelagian]]) practices of the Gallic church anathematized, and at the ensuing council in Vaison liturgical conformity with other Churches (Italy, Africa, the East) was established.<ref name=markus155>Markus 155-56.{{Full citation needed|date=August 2016}}</ref>
A model for the following Frankish synods was set by [[Clovis I]], who organized the [[First Council of Orléans]] (511); though he did not himself attend it, he set the agenda and followed the proceedings closely (at stake was "the unification of the Roman church under Frankish rule").<ref>Halfond, Gregory I. (2009). ''Archaeology of Frankish Church Councils, AD 511-768'', pp. 8f.</ref> After the waning of Caesarius's influence and the establishment of Merovingian rule, the focus of the soon-to-be Frankish Church shifted north, to deal with the growing problem of adjusting to "deeply embedded Germanic practices"; rather than Pelagianism or Predestinatarianism, bishops now had to deal with problems involving "marriage, the relations between a warrior aristocracy and clergy, or monks and nuns, the conflicts born of royal influence and control, or of property rights".<ref name=markus155/>
By the eighth century, the regular organization of synods had largely disappeared, and when Boniface complained to [[Pope Zacharias]] in 742 that there hadn't been a synod in the Frankish church in at least eighty years, he was not exaggerating by much.<ref>Hartmann 59.</ref><ref>Schuler, Matthias (1947). "Zum 1200jähr. Jubiläum des fränkischen Generalkonzils vom Jahre 747. Der Höhepunkt der Reformtätigkeit des hl. Bonifatius". ''Trierer Theologische Zeitschrift'' 56: 362–70.</ref>
 
==See also==