C.Fred

::::::::::::::::::::::I responded that I sent this information to you especially the youtube one, before the curentcurrent administration issue began, ONLY because of the danger of using Ethnologue database ALONE without using other PUBLISHED sources. We already have published sources which show that the grouping of this people and their language is not supposed to be as stated in ethnologue. My point is that things in the database of ethnologue can change because they admitted that they are open to corrections, we should not think they are on top of all the thousand of langauges. I did not cite it as a primary resource anywhere in wikipedia pages, what I cited in wikipedia was Uzoigwe, G. N. The beginnings of Lango society : a review of evidence. OCLC 38562622

::::::::::::::::::::::I also cited an article in monitor which I have now noticed it has been deleted. These sources showed that the Lango and Kumam languages have a mixture of two different dialects due to Ateker origin and proximity with other Lwo groups. So I asked for feedback on my reply, did you see it? OneBites had said we do not use primary resource at all in wikipedia; but one editor respondedobjected saying that it is not ture, because primary resource can be used on a limited capacity. So where is my fault on this? [[User:Ngunalik|Ngunalik]] ([[User talk:Ngunalik|talk]]) 06:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::::I raised it as well that my other sources were deleted manually which is not good in my opinion. It is a cassecase of someone accusing me that I only brought cited a travel guide yet it turns out they deleted the main resources I had relied on. They finally admitted it to the community, as you can see below