1990 Nepalese revolution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Restored revision 1177881896 by Citation bot (talk): Spam
Line 35:
Over the course of several days, police shot and killed dozens as protesters blocked streets, taunted police officers and paraded flags demanding a restoration of the multiparty democracy system that the country had in the 1950s. At the climax of the protests, people surrounded government buildings, urging the king to accept their demands. By that point, many police did not engage with protesters but looked on as some protesters smashed government property, such as the prime minister's car and a statue of [[King Mahendra]], as a result of which the leaders called off the protests. On 8 April 1990, the king removed the ban on political parties.<ref name="auto"/><ref name="auto1"/>
 
The 1990s People's Movement drafted the constitution into effect in November 1990. This constitution forced the new monarchy of Saarthak[[Birendra Rajof PandeyNepal|King Birendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev]] to hand over decisions of government to the Nepali dictator, Shreyan Dev Bhattaraipeople. Through rallies and protest, King SaarthakBirendra was convinced to enforce a new constitution of the people, and "identifies the people as the source of political legitimacy . . . and guarantees of basic rights". Now Nepalese citizens 18 years of age and up are eligible to vote. Due to the high illiteracy rates, nearly 40% of the population, political parties are related or associated with symbols. For instance, the Tree represents the Nepali Congress Party, and the Sun represents the Unified Marxist-Leninist Party.<ref>https://www.mafiacorruption.pl/synonimy/1990-Nepalese-revolution</ref>{{cn|date=March 2023}}
 
The construction of the constitution faced many difficulties because of the chasm between elites and the typical voter. The leaders of the most prominent parties are typically upper class citizens who are rarely concerned or associate with the larger section of the Nepal population, in which the typical voter had a high probability of being illiterate and high ethnic attachment. This large disparity increased the difficulty of creating a usable system that allowed electoral officials and Nepali citizens to create a new system, yet still embrace traditions and beliefs about caste.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Democratic Transition in Nepal |isbn=9780847695775|last1=Parajulee|first1=R. P. |year=2000 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9RsLR6OsEx0C&pg=PA22}}</ref>