Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

::::::::::What I find laughable (and hypocritical) is when editors like KyleJoan insist only on their edits (article ownership) by reverting all other edits, when those edits are simply minor, such as the addition of the right and necessary punctuations, and improvements on cohesion and flow. Editors like KyleJoan, who revert all edits not made by them, are simply gatekeeping and doing article ownership. No doubt about that, in my opinion. Actions like this won't inspire more editors, new editors who want to contribute, and in turn won't inspire more edits and growth in Wikipedia. It is in my opinion, that actions done by KyleJoan—article ownership and edit warring, and accusing other editors of hounding and other ridiculous accusations then requiring these newer editors to explain things for them to support their unreasonable accusations, simply are bullying these newer editors to submission—these actions are more detrimental to the site, than they are helpful. Editors like KyleJoan who look down on newer editors, and then gatekeep and own articles insisting only on their edits as the right and one-true edit, are, in my opinion, a harm to this site in the long run.[[User:Migsmigss|Migsmigss]] ([[User talk:Migsmigss|talk]]) 10:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

:::::::::::{{u|Migsmigss}}, by which path have you reached the article about [[Christian Bale]] today? [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 10:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)