Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Rich Farmbrough's editing restrictions, again: one more bullet I meant to put in, but accidentally omitted |
|||
Line 1,327:
* ''Consensus'' in respect of Rich Farnborough's editing restrictions shall be defined as approval at [[WP:BRFA]] or a formally closed [[WP:RFC]] with more than ten non-canvassed participants
* Rich Farmborough is reminded that our bot policy says {{xt|Editors who choose to use semi-automated tools to assist their editing should be aware that processes which operate at higher speeds, with a higher volume of edits, or with less human involvement are more likely to be treated as bots. If there is any doubt, you should make a bot approval request.}} That is, an RFC alone may not be sufficient to comply with [[WP:BOT]], but an RFC may be required before BAG will approve it, so both may often be needed.
* There was a strong feeling in the discussion that Rich Farmborough, when opening the discussion at Wikiproject Cities, should have declared that he was doing so because of his editing restrictions. Failure to do so in the future may be viewed as attempted evasion of these restrictions.
:[[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 13:
}}
{{anchor|Rich Farmbrough's editing restrictions, again.}}
| |||