Inertial frame of reference: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by 83.30.178.205 (talk) to last version by Johnjbarton
Fixed grammar
Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Fundamental concept of classical mechanics}}
{{tone|date=January 2018}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2019}}
 
{{Classical mechanics|cTopic=Core topics}}
 
In [[classical physics]] and [[special relativity]], an '''[[inertia]]linertial frame of reference''' (also called an '''inertial space''', or a '''Galilean reference frame''') is a [[frame of reference]] in which objects exhibit [[inertia]]: they remain at rest or in uniform motion relative to the frame until acted upon by external forces. In such a frame, the laws of nature takecan onbe aobserved without the need to particularlycorrect simplefor formacceleration.
 
All frames of reference with zero acceleration are in a state of constant, [[rectilinear motion]] (straight -line motion) with respect to one another. In such a frame, an object with zero [[net force]] acting on it, is perceived to move with a constant [[velocity]], or, equivalently, [[Newton's laws of motion#Newton's first law|Newton's first law of motion]] holds. ThoseSuch frames are theknown frames calledas inertial. Originally, someSome physicists, like [[Isaac Newton]], originally thought that one of thosethese frames was absolute — the one approximated by the [[fixed stars]]. However, this is not required for the definition, and it is now known that those stars are in fact moving.
 
According to the [[Principle of relativity#Special principle of relativity|special principle of special relativity]], all [[physical laws]] look the same in all inertial reference frames, and no inertial frame is privileged over the otheranother. [[Measurement|Measurements]] of objects in one inertial frame can be converted to [[Measurement|measurements]] in another by a simple transformation — the [[Galilean transformation]] in [[Newtonian physics]] or the [[Lorentz transformation]] (combined with a translation) in [[special relativity]]; these approximately match when the relative speed of the frames is low, but differ as it approaches the [[speed of light]].
 
By contrast, a ''[[non-inertial reference frame]]'' has non-zero acceleration. In such a frame, the interactions between [[physical object]]s vary depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an inertial frame. Viewed from the perspective of [[classical mechanics]] and [[special relativity]], the 'usual' [[Fundamental forces|physical forces]] caused by the interaction of objects have to be supplemented by [[fictitious force]]s caused by [[inertia]].<ref name="Rothman">{{Cite book|title=Discovering the Natural Laws: The Experimental Basis of Physics |author= Milton A. Rothman |page=[https://archive.org/details/discoveringnatur0000roth/page/n37/mode/2up 23-24] |url=https://archive.org/details/discoveringnatur0000roth
|url-access=registration |quote=reference laws of physics. |isbn=0-486-26178-6 |publisher=Courier Dover Publications |date=1989}}</ref><ref name="Borowitz">{{Cite book|title=A Contemporary View of Elementary Physics |page=[https://archive.org/details/contemporaryview00boro/page/138 138] |publisher=McGraw-Hill |date=1968 |url=https://archive.org/details/contemporaryview00boro|url-access=registration |asin= B000GQB02A |author1=Sidney Borowitz |author2=Lawrence A. Bornstein }}</ref>
Viewed from the perspective of [[General relativity|general relativity theory]], the inertialfictitious (i.e. fictitiousinertial) forces are attributed to [[geodesic (general relativity)|geodesic motion in spacetime]].
 
Due to [[Earth's rotation]], its surface is not an inertial frame of reference. The [[Coriolis effect]] can deflect certain forms of motion as seen from [[Earth]], and the [[centrifugal force]] will reduce the effective [[gravity]] at the [[equator]]. Nevertheless, for many applications the Earth is aan goodadequate [[approximation]] of an inertial reference frame, adequate in many applications.
 
==Introduction==
Line 22 ⟶ 20:
REF
--><ref name="Einstein">{{Cite book|title=The Principle of Relativity: a collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity |last1=Einstein |first1=A. |author-link1=Albert Einstein |last2=Lorentz |first2=H. A. |author-link2=Hendrik Lorentz|last3=Minkowski |first3=H. |author-link3=Hermann Minkowski |last4=Weyl |first4=H. |author-link4=Hermann Weyl |page=111 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yECokhzsJYIC&q=postulate+%22Principle+of+Relativity%22&pg=PA111
|isbn=0-486-60081-5 |publisher=Courier Dover Publications |date=1952 }}</ref>{{blockquote|<i>Special principle of relativity: If a system of coordinates K is chosen so that, in relation to it, physical laws hold good in their simplest form, the same laws hold good in relation to any other system of coordinates K' moving in uniform translation relatively to K.</i>|Albert Einstein: ''The foundation of the general theory of relativity'', Section A, §1}}
This simplicity manifests itself in that inertial frames have self-contained physics without the need for external causes, while physics in '''non-inertial frames''' has external causes.<ref name="Ferraro">{{citation|title=Einstein's Space-Time: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity|first1=Rafael|last1=Ferraro|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|date=2007|isbn=9780387699462|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wa3CskhHaIgC&pg=PA209|pages=209–210|bibcode=2007esti.book.....F|access-date=2 November 2022|archive-date=7 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230307110753/https://books.google.com/books?id=wa3CskhHaIgC&pg=PA209|url-status=live}}</ref> The principle of simplicity can be used within Newtonian physics as well as in special relativity:<ref name=Nagel>{{Cite book|title=The Structure of Science |author=Ernest Nagel |page=212 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u6EycHgRfkQC&q=inertial+%22Foucault%27s+pendulum%22&pg=PA212 |isbn=0-915144-71-9 |publisher=Hackett Publishing |date=1979 }}</ref><ref name="Blagojević">{{Cite book|title=Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries |author=Milutin Blagojević |page=4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N8JDSi_eNbwC&q=inertial+frame+%22absolute+space%22&pg=PA5 |isbn=0-7503-0767-6 |publisher=CRC Press |date=2002}}</ref>
{{blockquote|The laws of Newtonian mechanics do not always hold in their simplest form...If, for instance, an observer is placed on a disc rotating relative to the earth, he/she will sense a 'force' pushing him/her toward the periphery of the disc, which is not caused by any interaction with other bodies. Here, the acceleration is not the consequence of the usual force, but of the so-called inertial force. Newton's laws hold in their simplest form only in a family of reference frames, called inertial frames. This fact represents the essence of the Galilean principle of relativity:<br />&ensp;&ensp;&ensp;The laws of mechanics have the same form in all inertial frames.|Milutin Blagojević: ''Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries'', p. 4}}
 
{{blockquote|<i>The laws of Newtonian mechanics do not always hold in their simplest form...If, for instance, an observer is placed on a disc rotating relative to the earth, he/she will sense a 'force' pushing him/her toward the periphery of the disc, which is not caused by any interaction with other bodies. Here, the acceleration is not the consequence of the usual force, but of the so-called inertial force. Newton's laws hold in their simplest form only in a family of reference frames, called inertial frames. This fact represents the essence of the Galilean principle of relativity:<br />&ensp;&ensp;&ensp;The laws of mechanics have the same form in all inertial frames.</i>|Milutin Blagojević: ''Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries'', p. 4}}
However, this definition of inertial frames is understood to apply in the Newtonian realm and ignores relativistic effects.
 
However, this definition of inertial frames is understood to apply in the [[Newtonian dynamics|Newtonian]] realm and ignores relativistic effects.
 
In practical terms, the equivalence of inertial reference frames means that scientists within a box moving with a constant absolute velocity cannot determine this velocity by any experiment. Otherwise, the differences would set up an absolute standard reference frame.<ref name="Einstein2">{{Cite book|title=Relativity: The Special and General Theory |author=Albert Einstein |page=[https://archive.org/details/relativityspeci00lawsgoog/page/n38 17] |date=1920 |publisher=H. Holt and Company |url=https://archive.org/details/relativityspeci00lawsgoog |quote=The Principle of Relativity. }}</ref><ref name="Feynman">{{Cite book |title=Six not-so-easy pieces: Einstein's relativity, symmetry, and space-time |author=Richard Phillips Feynman |page=73 |isbn=0-201-32842-9 |date=1998 |publisher=Basic Books |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ipY8onVQWhcC&q=%22The+Principle+of+Relativity%22&pg=PA49 }}{{Dead link|date=January 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> According to this definition, supplemented with the constancy of the speed of light, inertial frames of reference transform among themselves according to the [[Poincaré group]] of symmetry transformations, of which the [[Lorentz transformation]]s are a subgroup.<ref name="Wachter">{{Cite book|title=Compendium of Theoretical Physics |author1=Armin Wachter |author2=Henning Hoeber |page=98 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j3IQpdkinxMC&q=%2210-parameter+proper+orthochronous+Poincare+group%22&pg=PA98 |isbn=0-387-25799-3 |publisher=Birkhäuser |date=2006 }}</ref> In Newtonian mechanics, inertial frames of reference are related by the [[Galilean group]] of symmetries.
Line 36 ⟶ 35:
Newton posited an absolute space considered well-approximated by a frame of reference stationary relative to the [[fixed stars]]. An inertial frame was then one in uniform translation relative to absolute space. However, some "relativists",<ref name="Mach">{{Cite book |author=Ernst Mach |url=https://archive.org/details/sciencemechanic01jourgoog |title=The Science of Mechanics |date=1915 |publisher=The Open Court Publishing Co. |page=[https://archive.org/details/sciencemechanic01jourgoog/page/n59 38] |quote=rotating sphere Mach cord OR string OR rod.}}</ref> even at the time of Newton, felt that absolute space was a defect of the formulation, and should be replaced.
 
The expression ''inertial frame of reference'' ({{lang-langx|de|Inertialsystem}}) was coined by [[Ludwig Lange (physicist)|Ludwig Lange]] in 1885, to replace Newton's definitions of "absolute space and time" with a more [[Operational definition#Science|operational definition]].:<ref>{{Cite journal
|author=Lange, Ludwig
|date=1885
Line 42 ⟶ 41:
|journal=Philosophische Studien
|volume=2}}</ref><ref name=Barbour>{{Cite book|author=Julian B. Barbour |title=The Discovery of Dynamics |edition=Reprint of 1989 ''Absolute or Relative Motion?'' |pages=645–646 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WQidkYkleXcC&q=Ludwig+Lange+%22operational+definition%22&pg=PA645
|isbn=0-19-513202-5 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2001 }}</ref>
|isbn=0-19-513202-5 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2001 }}</ref> As translated by Harald Iro, [https://books.google.com/books?id=9a9KAAAAMAAJ&q=Inertialsystem+inauthor:%22von+Laue%22 Lange proposed] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230421232531/https://books.google.com/books?id=9a9KAAAAMAAJ&q=Inertialsystem%20inauthor%3A%22von%20Laue%22 |date=21 April 2023 }} the following definition:<ref name=Iro>L. Lange (1885) as quoted by Max von Laue in his book (1921) ''Die Relativitätstheorie'', p. 34, and translated by {{Cite book|page=169 |title=A Modern Approach to Classical Mechanics |author=Harald Iro |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-L5ckgdxA5YC&q=inertial+noninertial&pg=PA179 |isbn=981-238-213-5 |date=2002 |publisher=World Scientific}}</ref>
 
{{blockquote|<i>A reference frame in which a mass point thrown from the same point in three different (non co-planar) directions follows rectilinear paths each time it is thrown, is called an inertial frame.</i><ref name=Iro>L. Lange (1885) as quoted by Max von Laue in his book (1921) ''Die Relativitätstheorie'', p. 34, and translated by {{Cite book|page=169 |title=A Modern Approach to Classical Mechanics |author=Harald Iro |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-L5ckgdxA5YC&q=inertial+noninertial&pg=PA179 |isbn=981-238-213-5 |date=2002 |publisher=World Scientific}}</ref>}}
 
The inadequacy of the notion of "absolute space" in Newtonian mechanics is spelled out by BlagojevićBlagojevich:<ref name="Blagojević2">{{Cite book|title=Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries |author=Milutin Blagojević |page=5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N8JDSi_eNbwC&q=inertial+frame+%22absolute+space%22&pg=PA5 |isbn=0-7503-0767-6 |publisher=CRC Press |date=2002}}</ref>

{{blockquote|<i>
*The existence of absolute space contradicts the internal logic of classical mechanics since, according to the Galilean principle of relativity, none of the inertial frames can be singled out.
*Absolute space does not explain inertial forces since they are related to acceleration with respect to any one of the inertial frames.
*Absolute space acts on physical objects by inducing their resistance to acceleration but it cannot be acted upon.
</i>| Milutin Blagojević: ''Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries'', p. 5}}
 
The utility of operational definitions was carried much further in the special theory of relativity.<ref name=Woodhouse0>{{Cite book|title=Special relativity |author=NMJ Woodhouse |page=58 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tM9hic_wo3sC&q=Woodhouse+%22operational+definition%22&pg=PA126 |isbn=1-85233-426-6 |publisher=Springer |location=London |date=2003}}</ref> Some historical background including Lange's definition is provided by DiSalle, who says in summary:<ref name=DiSalle>{{Cite book
Line 65 ⟶ 66:
|url-status =live
}}</ref>
 
{{blockquote|<i>The original question, "relative to what frame of reference do the laws of motion hold?" is revealed to be wrongly posed. The laws of motion essentially determine a class of reference frames, and (in principle) a procedure for constructing them.</i>|[http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2002/entries/spacetime-iframes/#Oth Robert DiSalle ''Space and Time: Inertial Frames'']}}
 
===Newtonian mechanics===
Line 86 ⟶ 88:
Newton viewed the first law as valid in any reference frame that is in uniform motion (neither rotating nor accelerating) relative to [[absolute space]]; as a practical matter, "absolute space" was considered to be the [[fixed stars]]<ref>For a discussion of the role of fixed stars, see {{Cite book |title=Nothingness: The Science of Empty Space |author=Henning Genz |page=150 |isbn=0-7382-0610-5 |publisher=Da Capo Press |date=2001 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cn_Q9wbDOM0C&q=frame+Newton+%22fixed+stars%22&pg=PA150 }}{{Dead link|date=January 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref name=Resnick>{{Cite book|title=Physics |page=Volume 1, Chapter 3 |isbn=0-471-32057-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofph02hall
|url-access=registration |quote=physics resnick. |publisher=Wiley |date=2001 |edition=5th |author1=Robert Resnick |author2=David Halliday |author3=Kenneth S. Krane |no-pp=true }}</ref> In the theory of relativity the notion of [[absolute space]] or a [[privileged frame]] is abandoned, and an inertial frame in the field of [[classical mechanics]] is defined as:<ref name=Takwale>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=r5P29cN6s6QC&q=fixed+stars+%22inertial+frame%22&pg=PA70 |title=Introduction to classical mechanics |page=70 |author=RG Takwale |publisher=Tata McGraw-Hill|date=1980 |isbn=0-07-096617-6 |location=New Delhi}}</ref><ref name=Woodhouse>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ggPXQAeeRLgC |title=Special relativity |page=6 |author=NMJ Woodhouse |publisher=Springer |date=2003 |isbn=1-85233-426-6 |location=London/Berlin}}</ref>
 
{{blockquote|<i>An inertial frame of reference is one in which the motion of a particle not subject to forces is in a straight line at constant speed.</i>}}
 
Hence, with respect to an inertial frame, an object or body [[acceleration|accelerates]] only when a physical [[force]] is applied, and (following [[Newton's laws of motion|Newton's first law of motion]]), in the absence of a net force, a body at [[rest (physics)|rest]] will remain at rest and a body in motion will continue to move uniformly—that is, in a straight line and at constant [[speed]]. Newtonian inertial frames transform among each other according to the [[Galilean transformation|Galilean group of symmetries]].
 
If this rule is interpreted as saying that [[straight-line motion]] is an indication of zero net force, the rule does not identify inertial reference frames because straight-line motion can be observed in a variety of frames. If the rule is interpreted as defining an inertial frame, then being able to determine when zero net force is applied is crucial. The problem was summarized by Einstein:<ref name=Einstein5>{{Cite book|title=The Meaning of Relativity |author=A Einstein |page=58 |date=1950 |url=https://books.google.com/books?num=10&btnG=Google+Search|publisher=Princeton University Press}}</ref>
 
{{blockquote|<i>The weakness of the principle of inertia lies in this, that it involves an argument in a circle: a mass moves without acceleration if it is sufficiently far from other bodies; we know that it is sufficiently far from other bodies only by the fact that it moves without acceleration.</i>|Albert Einstein: ''[[The Meaning of Relativity]]'', p. 58}}
 
There are several approaches to this issue. One approach is to argue that all real forces drop off with distance from their sources in a known manner, so it is only needed that a body is far enough away from all sources to ensure that no force is present.<ref name=Rosser>{{Cite book|title=Introductory Special Relativity |author=William Geraint Vaughan Rosser |page=3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zpjBEBbIjAIC&q=reference+%22laws+of+physics%22&pg=PA94
|isbn=0-85066-838-7 |date=1991 |publisher=CRC Press }}</ref> A possible issue with this approach is the historically long-lived view that the distant universe might affect matters ([[Mach's principle]]). Another approach is to identify all real sources for real forces and account for them. A possible issue with this approach is the possibility of missing something, or accounting inappropriately for their influence, perhaps, again, due to Mach's principle and an incomplete understanding of the universe. A third approach is to look at the way the forces transform when shifting reference frames. Fictitious forces, those that arise due to the acceleration of a frame, disappear in inertial frames and have complicated rules of transformation in general cases. Based on the universality of physical law and the request for frames where the laws are most simply expressed, inertial frames are distinguished by the absence of such fictitious forces.
 
Newton enunciated a principle of relativity himself in one of his corollaries to the laws of motion:<ref name=Feynman2>{{Cite book |title=Six not-so-easy pieces: Einstein's relativity, symmetry, and space-time |author=Richard Phillips Feynman |page=50 |isbn=0-201-32842-9 |date=1998 |publisher=Basic Books |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ipY8onVQWhcC&q=%22The+Principle+of+Relativity%22&pg=PA49 }}{{Dead link|date=January 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref name=Principia>See the ''Principia'' on line at [https://archive.org/stream/newtonspmathema00newtrich#page/n7/mode/2up Andrew Motte Translation]</ref>

{{blockquote|<i>The motions of bodies included in a given space are the same among themselves, whether that space is at rest or moves uniformly forward in a straight line.</i>|Isaac Newton: ''Principia'', Corollary V, p. 88 in Andrew Motte translation}}
 
This principle differs from the [[#principle|special principle]] in two ways: first, it is restricted to mechanics, and second, it makes no mention of simplicity. It shares the special principle of the invariance of the form of the description among mutually translating reference frames.<ref name=note1>However, in the Newtonian system the Galilean transformation connects these frames and in the special theory of relativity the [[Lorentz transformation]] connects them. The two transformations agree for speeds of translation much less than the [[speed of light]].</ref> The role of fictitious forces in classifying reference frames is pursued further below.
Line 116 ⟶ 123:
: <math>x_1(t) = d + v_1 t = 200 + 22t,\quad x_2(t) = v_2 t = 30t.</math>
 
Notice that these formulas predict at ''t'' = 0 s the first car is 200 m200m down the road and the second car is right beside us, as expected. We want to find the time at which <math>x_1=x_2</math>. Therefore, we set <math>x_1=x_2</math> and solve for <math>t</math>, that is:
 
: <math>200 + 22t = 30t,</math>
Line 144 ⟶ 151:
{{See also|Equivalence principle|Eötvös experiment}}
General relativity is based upon the principle of equivalence:<ref name=Morin>{{Cite book|title=Introduction to Classical Mechanics |author=David Morin |page=[https://archive.org/details/introductiontocl00mori/page/649 649] |url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontocl00mori |url-access=registration |quote=acceleration azimuthal Morin. |isbn=978-0-521-87622-3 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2008}}</ref><ref name=Giancoli>{{Cite book|title=Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics |author=Douglas C. Giancoli |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xz-UEdtRmzkC&q=%22principle+of+equivalence%22&pg=PA155
|page=155 |date=2007 |publisher=Pearson Prentice Hall |isbn=978-0-13-149508-1 }}</ref>
{{blockquote|<i>There is no experiment observers can perform to distinguish whether an acceleration arises because of a gravitational force or because their reference frame is accelerating.</i>|Douglas C. Giancoli, ''Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics'', p. 155.}}
 
This idea was introduced in Einstein's 1907 article "Principle of Relativity and Gravitation" and later developed in 1911.<ref name=General_theory>A. Einstein, "[http://www.relativitycalculator.com/pdfs/On_the_influence_of_Gravitation_on_the_Propagation_of_Light_English2.pdf On the influence of gravitation on the propagation of light] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201224033225/http://www.relativitycalculator.com/pdfs/On_the_influence_of_Gravitation_on_the_Propagation_of_Light_English2.pdf |date=24 December 2020 }}", ''Annalen der Physik'', vol. 35, (1911) : 898–908</ref> Support for this principle is found in the [[Eötvös experiment]], which determines whether the ratio of inertial to gravitational mass is the same for all bodies, regardless of size or composition. To date no difference has been found to a few parts in 10<sup>11</sup>.<ref name=NRC>{{Cite book|title=Physics Through the Nineteen Nineties: Overview |page=15 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Hk1wj61PlocC&q=equivalence+gravitation&pg=PA15
|isbn=0-309-03579-1 |date=1986 |author=National Research Council (US) |publisher=National Academies Press }}</ref> For some discussion of the subtleties of the Eötvös experiment, such as the local mass distribution around the experimental site (including a quip about the mass of Eötvös himself), see Franklin.<ref name=Franklin>{{Cite book|title=No Easy Answers: Science and the Pursuit of Knowledge |author=Allan Franklin |page=66 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_RN-v31rXuIC&q=%22Eotvos+experiment%22&pg=PA66
Line 151 ⟶ 160:
Einstein's [[general relativity|general theory]] modifies the distinction between nominally "inertial" and "non-inertial" effects by replacing special relativity's "flat" [[Minkowski Space]] with a metric that produces non-zero curvature. In general relativity, the principle of inertia is replaced with the principle of [[geodesic (general relativity)|geodesic motion]], whereby objects move in a way dictated by the curvature of spacetime. As a consequence of this curvature, it is not a given in general relativity that inertial objects moving at a particular rate with respect to each other will continue to do so. This phenomenon of [[geodesic deviation]] means that inertial frames of reference do not exist globally as they do in Newtonian mechanics and special relativity.
 
However, the general theory reduces to the special theory over sufficiently small regions of [[spacetime]], where curvature effects become less important and the earlier inertial frame arguments can come back into play.<ref>{{cite book |title=Information Theory and Quantum Physics: Physical Foundations for Understanding the Conscious Process |first1=Herbert S. |last1=Green |publisher=Springer |date=2000 |isbn=354066517X |page=154 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CUJiQjSVCu8C}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=CUJiQjSVCu8C&pg=PA154 Extract of page 154]</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Theory of Special Relativity |first1=Nikhilendu |last1=Bandyopadhyay |publisher=Academic Publishers |date=2000 |isbn=8186358528 |page=116 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMOyfi_i0j8C}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=qMOyfi_i0j8C&pg=PA116 Extract of page 116]</ref> Consequently, modern special relativity is now sometimes described as only a "local theory".<ref>{{cite book |title=Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure |first1=Andrew R. |last1=Liddle |first2=David H. |last2=Lyth |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2000 |isbn=0-521-57598-2 |page=329 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XmWauPZSovMC}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=XmWauPZSovMC&pg=PA329 Extract of page 329]</ref> "Local" can encompass, for example, the entire [[Milky Way galaxy]]: The astronomer [[Karl Schwarzschild]] observed the motion of pairs of stars orbiting each other. He found that the two orbits of the stars of such a system lie in a plane, and the perihelion of the orbits of the two stars remains pointing in the same direction with respect to the [[Solar System]]. Schwarzschild pointed out that that was invariably seen: the direction of the [[angular momentum]] of all observed double star systems remains fixed with respect to the direction of the angular momentum of the Solar System. These observations allowed him to conclude that inertial frames inside the galaxy do not rotate with respect to one another, and that the space of the Milky Way is approximately Galilean or Minkowskian.<ref>[http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P271.PDF In the Shadow of the Relativity Revolution] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170520084821/http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P271.PDF |date=20 May 2017 }} Section 3: The Work of Karl Schwarzschild (2.2 MB PDF-file)</ref>
 
===Inertial frames and rotation===
Line 236 ⟶ 245:
[[Image:Rotating spheres.svg|thumb|180px|'''Figure 2''': Two spheres tied with a string and rotating at an angular rate ω. Because of the rotation, the string tying the spheres together is under tension.]]
[[Image:Rotating-sphere forces.svg|thumb|'''Figure 3''': Exploded view of rotating spheres in an inertial frame of reference showing the centripetal forces on the spheres provided by the tension in the tying string.]]
Inertial and non-inertial reference frames can be distinguished by the absence or presence of [[fictitious force]]s.<ref name="Rothman"/><ref name="Borowitz"/>
{{blockquote|<i>The effect of this being in the noninertial frame is to require the observer to introduce a fictitious force into his calculations….</i>|Sidney Borowitz and Lawrence A Bornstein in ''A Contemporary View of Elementary Physics'', p. 138}}
 
The presence of fictitious forces indicates the physical laws are not the simplest laws available, in terms of the [[#principle|special principle of relativity]], a frame where fictitious forces are present is not an inertial frame:<ref name=Arnold2>{{Cite book|title=Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics |page=129 |author=V. I. Arnol'd |authorlink=Vladimir Arnold|isbn=978-0-387-96890-2 |date=1989 |url=https://books.google.com/books?num=10&btnG=Google+Search|publisher=Springer}}</ref>
 
{{blockquote|<i>The equations of motion in a non-inertial system differ from the equations in an inertial system by additional terms called inertial forces. This allows us to detect experimentally the non-inertial nature of a system.</i>|[[Vladimir Arnold|V. I. Arnol'd]]: ''[[Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics]]'' Second Edition, p. 129}}
 
Bodies in [[non-inertial reference frame]]s are subject to so-called ''fictitious'' forces (pseudo-forces); that is, [[force]]s that result from the acceleration of the [[Frame of reference|reference frame]] itself and not from any physical force acting on the body. Examples of fictitious forces are the [[centrifugal force (fictitious)|centrifugal force]] and the [[Coriolis force]] in [[rotating reference frame]]s.
 
Line 248 ⟶ 261:
 
For [[linear acceleration]], Newton expressed the idea of undetectability of straight-line accelerations held in common:<ref name=Principia/>
 
{{blockquote|<i>If bodies, any how moved among themselves, are urged in the direction of parallel lines by equal accelerative forces, they will continue to move among themselves, after the same manner as if they had been urged by no such forces. </i>|Isaac Newton: ''Principia'' Corollary VI, p. 89, in Andrew Motte translation }}
 
This principle generalizes the notion of an inertial frame. For example, an observer confined in a free-falling lift will assert that he himself is a valid inertial frame, even if he is accelerating under gravity, so long as he has no knowledge about anything outside the lift. So, strictly speaking, inertial frame is a relative concept. With this in mind, inertial frames can collectively be defined as a set of frames which are stationary or moving at constant velocity with respect to each other, so that a single inertial frame is defined as an element of this set.
Line 255 ⟶ 269:
 
===Applications===
[[Inertial navigation system]]s used a cluster of [[gyroscope]]s and accelerometers to determine accelerations relative to inertial space. After a gyroscope is spun up in a particular orientation in inertial space, the law of conservation of angular momentum requires that it retain that orientation as long as no external forces are applied to it.<ref>{{cite book|last=Chatfield|first=Averil B.|title=Fundamentals of High Accuracy Inertial Navigation, Volume 174|date=1997|publisher=AIAA|isbn=9781600864278}}</ref>{{rp|59}} Three orthogonal gyroscopes establish an inertial reference frame, and the accelerators measure acceleration relative to that frame. The accelerations, along with a clock, can then be used to calculate the change in position. Thus, inertial navigation is a form of [[dead reckoning]] that requires no external input, and therefore cannot be jammed by any external or internal signal source.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Kennie|editor-first1=T.J.M.|title=Engineering Surveying Technology|date=1993|publisher=Taylor & Francis|location=Hoboken|isbn=9780203860748|page=95|edition=pbk.|editor-last2=Petrie|editor-first2=G.}}</ref>
 
A [[gyrocompass]], employed for navigation of seagoing vessels, finds the geometric north. It does so, not by sensing the Earth's magnetic field, but by using inertial space as its reference. The outer casing of the gyrocompass device is held in such a way that it remains aligned with the local plumb line. When the gyroscope wheel inside the gyrocompass device is spun up, the way the gyroscope wheel is suspended causes the gyroscope wheel to gradually align its spinning axis with the Earth's axis. Alignment with the Earth's axis is the only direction for which the gyroscope's spinning axis can be stationary with respect to the Earth and not be required to change direction with respect to inertial space. After being spun up, a gyrocompass can reach the direction of alignment with the Earth's axis in as little as a quarter of an hour.<ref name=l>{{cite magazine|title=The gyroscope pilots ships & planes |magazine=Life|date=15 March 1943 |pages=80–83|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YlEEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA82}}</ref>{{unreferenced section|date=July 2013}}