Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: template type. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_webform 169/2600 |
m Added {{Essay-like}} tag |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|19th-century Afrikaner cultural and nationalist movement}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{
{{Essay-like|date=December 2024}}
}}
{{Use South African English|date=May 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=
{{Calvinism}}
'''Afrikaner Calvinism''' ({{
A number of modern studies have argued that [[Boers]] gathered for the [[Great Trek]] inspired by this concept, and they used it to legitimise their subordination of other South African ethnic groups. It is thought to have contributed the religious basis for modern [[Afrikaner nationalism]]
== Background ==
White settlement in [[South Africa]] is traced to the 1652 arrival of the [[Dutch East India Company]] at the [[Cape of Good Hope]], seeking to establish a supply and refreshment station for its ships and crews bound to and from
==Settlement period==
The Dutch settlement of the [[Cape of Good Hope]] was the first colonial success in South Africa. The
But many settlers believed they had arrived with a missionary motive, which included spreading the superiority of European culture. These factors contributed to the settler practice of indenturing the native Khoisan population to serve as workers and servants. Within that master/servant relationship, the Europeans would teach the Bible to them in hope that the message would filter back through the servant's family (along with reports of the superiority of the European way of life) and thus bring about conversion.
The farmers who lived outside the physical walls of the towns had a different arrangement with natives than did
Separation and rules of exchange were opposed very early in the Afrikaner mind to invasion and conquest. And, this [[anti-imperialism]] extended also to the theory of missionary obligation that developed within the [[Dutch Reformed Church]]: the [[Kingdom of God]] will grow within the sphere of influence assigned to the church by divine providence, as children are taught the Gospel by their parents and family. If God deems it fitting for the Gospel to be received by the natives, and taught to their children, then this is his glory. Toward that end, Christians have a defining role given them from God, a calling, or covenantal responsibility as God's people, to keep themselves pure in the faith and just in their dealings with the heathen, and to be absolutely unyielding in their protection of what has been legitimately claimed in the name of the [[Trinity|Triune God]].
==Folk religion==
This history is essential to understanding the distinctive concept of "calling" that developed among the Afrikaners. These attitudes, adopted very early
This [[folk religion]] was not articulated in a formal way. It was the experience of the Afrikaners, which they interpreted through their assurance that their absolutely sovereign Creator and their Lord had shown special grace to them as a particular people.
==Nationalism==
However, the [[French Revolution]] brought these habits of thought more self-consciously to the surface. France invaded the Republic of the United Provinces in January 1794, the Stadtholder fled to England and asked the [[Kingdom of Great Britain|British]] to send [[Royal Navy|its Navy]] to take care of the possessions of the [[Dutch East India Company|United East India Company]] that was in dire financial straits and in which
A more antithetical message could hardly be imagined, as the British Enlightenment found itself with the Afrikaners for the first time. From the Boer (meaning farmer in Dutch and Afrikaans) point of view, the Enlightenment had resulted in a foreign power ruling over them, imposing alien laws and alien languages, liberated their slaves without compensation, and put the interest of English-speakers over those of the Dutch-speakers. They were exposed to the Enlightenment, and it appeared to them to be a revolution against their [[God in Christianity|God]] and way of life.{{sfn|Du Toit|1985|p=209}}
== Schism between Boer and Cape Calvinists ==
During the Great Trek, many people, mostly from the eastern part of the [[Cape Colony]], went north, to areas not under control of the British colonies authorities. Because the Cape Dutch Reformed Church was seen by the trekkers as being an agent of the Cape government, they also did not trust its ministers and emissaries, seeing them as attempts by the Cape government to regain political control. There were also religious divisions among the trekkers themselves. A minister from the Netherlands, [[Dirk Van der Hoff]] went to the Transvaal in 1853, and became a minister in the [[Nederduitsch Hervormde Kerk]], which was constituted in 1856, and in 1860 recognised as the State Church of the [[South African Republic]] (also known as the Transvaal), separate from the Cape Church.
Meanwhile, back in the Netherlands, the Dutch State church had also been transformed by the Enlightenment, a change represented in the minds of those opposed it, by the loss of any meaningful profession of faith as requisite for adult church members, and the singing of hymns (in addition to psalms) and other innovations in worship and doctrine. In the Netherlands a movement grew in reaction to this perceived dismantlement of Biblical faith. It was called the Afscheiding, in which the Rev. Hendrik de Cock separated himself from the State Church in 1834 in Ulrum, Groningen. There was also a movement called the [[Reveil]] (''Awakening''), supported by those who did not separate from the State Church, like [[Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer]], whose writings became known in South Africa. And much later the leader of another schism called the [[Doleantie]], [[Abraham Kuyper]], began to become known to the Afrikaners. Highly critical of the Enlightenment, the "revolution" as they called it, the Doleantie in the church had counterparts in education and in politics. The timing of this influence was significant, coming on the crest of a wave of evangelical revival, the Reveil in the Dutch Reformed Church, which had been led in South Africa by the Scottish preacher, [[Andrew Murray (minister)|Andrew Murray]]. The slogan of the Doleantie, which eventually rang with unintended nationalist nuance for the Afrikaners was, "Separation is Strength".
==Doppers==
Line 47 ⟶ 50:
==Afrikaner Broederbond==
The [[Boer War]]s had left many of the Afrikaners utterly destitute. The ruined farmers were seen in the hundreds, following the war, lining the highways selling produce by the basket. After the four South African colonies united politically into the [[Union of South Africa]] and relinquished control to democratic elections, a small, anonymous group of young intellectuals called the [[Afrikaner Broederbond]], formed in the years following the [[Second Anglo-Boer War]] to discuss strategies for addressing the overwhelming social problem of ''poor whites'' and other Afrikaner interests. By the account of [[Irving Hexham]], according to [[Klaus Venter]] and [[Hendrik G. Stoker|Hendrick Stoker]] who were themselves disgruntled members of the secret organisation, in 1927 the Broederbond moved to Potchefstroom University, asking that the school would take over leadership of the then-struggling group. That year, the Broederbond formally adopted the Calvinist philosophy based on the work of [[Abraham Kuyper]]. The Broederbond believed, with deep-rooted conviction, that what their past had provided them through the interpretation of faith was a model of anti-imperialism, self-discipline and responsibility, which in the end would preserve justice for all – blacks, coloured, and whites – against Communist deceit. These strategies that arose from the Broederbond were directly responsible for the establishment of [[apartheid]], in 1948.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}}
After the [[Sharpeville massacre]] in 1960, under enormous international pressure, the Broederbond began a slow and quiet re-examination of their policy proposals. And yet no significant changes took place to reform the apartheid system until the [[Soweto]] riots in 1976. Some time after this, the Broederbond declared apartheid an irreformable failure and began work to dismantle it. The conviction had finally become established, although not universally that, if the Afrikaner people, language and religion were to survive, they must take the initiative to emerge from the laager, and invite South Africa in. The Broederbond (dropping the policy of secrecy and with the new name ''[[Afrikanerbond]]'') began proposing initiatives for land reform and the reversal of apartheid.
==Radical changes==
The reversal of apartheid has cast the [[Nederduits Gereformeerde Kerk]] (NGK) into a period of change. While remaining confessionally Calvinist, the religious character of the church is now less cohesive and more difficult to assess. Having been thoroughly conflated with apartheid, historic Calvinism appears to have fallen out of favour. [[Liberation theology]], which attempts to reconcile [[Christianity]] with the [[Marxist]] doctrine of [[class struggle]], has gained a foothold in some quarters, and appears to have advocates on both the left and right ends of the political spectrum.{{Citation needed|date=March 2010}} American-style evangelicalism and [[Arminianism]] also appear to have made inroads, which with its more individualistic emphasis has less potential for a full-scale civil religion. Certainly the old synthesis of revealed and [[natural theology]] is largely repudiated; officially at least. But, the folk religion of the Afrikaners is not dead. Some scholars
In 1985, 92% of [[Afrikaners]] were members of Reformed Churches. By late 2013, this figure had dropped to 40%, while actual weekly church attendance of Reformed Churches is estimated to be around 25%.{{sfn|Oosthuizen|2014}}
==See also==
Line 72 ⟶ 73:
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite web|title=Krisis kom vir leë kerke |last=Oosthuizen |first=Jean |url=http://www.rapport.co.za/Weekliks/Nuus/Krisis-kom-vir-lee-kerke-20140111 |location=Johannesburg |publisher=Rapport (Netwerk 24 Nuus) |date=12 January 2014 |access-date=30 March 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140112231935/http://www.rapport.co.za/Weekliks/Nuus/Krisis-kom-vir-lee-kerke-20140111 |archive-date=12 January 2014 }}
*{{cite web|title=The Christian Afrikaners: A Brief History of Calvinistic Afrikanerdom from 1652
{{refend}}
Line 78 ⟶ 79:
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite journal|last=Williams |first=Blake |date=1991 |title=Apartheid in South Africa: Calvin's Legacy? |journal=The Upsilonian |volume=III |url=http://www.ucumberlands.edu/academics/history/files/vol3/BlakeWilliams91.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140914170953/http://www.ucumberlands.edu/academics/history/files/vol3/BlakeWilliams91.htm |archive-date=14 September 2014 }}
*{{cite journal|last1=Du Toit|first1=André |title=Puritans in Africa? Afrikaner "Calvinism" and Kuyperian Neo-Calvinism in Late Nineteenth-Century South Africa|journal=Comparative Studies in Society and History|volume=27|issue=2|year=1985|pages=209–240|issn=0010-4175|doi=10.1017/S0010417500011336|s2cid=145566439 }}
*{{cite web|title=Christianity in Central Southern Africa Prior to 1910 |author1=Hexham, Irving |author2=Poewe, Karla |url=http://people.ucalgary.ca/~nurelweb/papers/irving/ELPHINK.htm |location=University of Calgary |publisher=Nurelweb |year=1997 |access-date=30 March 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203051519/http://people.ucalgary.ca/~nurelweb/papers/irving/ELPHINK.htm |archive-date=3 December 2013 }}
{{refend}}
Line 122 ⟶ 123:
[[Category:Afrikaner nationalism]]
[[Category:Apartheid in South Africa]]
[[Category:History of
[[Category:History of Christianity in South Africa]]
[[Category:History of the Dutch East India Company]]
[[Category:Protestantism in South Africa]]
|