Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary |
||
(47 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
{{use dmy dates|date=April 2021}}
{{Infobox civil conflict
| title
| image
| caption
| date
| place
* [[Ho Chi Minh City]]
* [[Hanoi]]
Line 14:
* [[Khanh Hoa Province]]
* [[Tay Ninh Province]]
* United States
* [[Taiwan]]
*
| causes = * Special Zone
* Cybersecurity Law
* Environment
* Economic and social problems
| methods = * [[Demonstration
* [[Nonviolent resistance]]
* [[Internet activism|Online activism]]
Line 29 ⟶ 27:
* [[General strikes]]
* [[Riots]]
| result
* Rescinded through Special Zone Act
* Passed Cybersecurity Law on 1st January, 2019
| side1 =
Protesters
----
'''Supported by:'''
{{flagicon image|Viet Tan Logo.png}} [[Việt Tân]] (alleged, denied)<br>
{{flagdeco|South Vietnam}} [[Third Republic of Vietnam]] (alleged)
{{endplainlist}}
| side2 =
* [[File:Communist Party of Vietnam flag logo.svg|15px]] [[Communist Party of Vietnam]]
* [[File:Communist Party of Vietnam flag logo.svg|15px]] [[Political Bureau|Politburo]]
*
**
**[[Mobile Police Command]]
* [[File:Emblem VPA.svg| ** [[File:
* [[File:Flag of HCM Communist Youth Union.svg|22px]][[Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union]]
| leadfigures1 = No centralised leaders▼
| leadfigures2 = [[Nguyễn Xuân Phúc]]<br>[[Nguyễn Phú Trọng]]<br>[[Trần Đại Quang]]<br>[[Tô Lâm]]<br>[[Ngô Xuân Lịch]]▼
▲No centralised leaders
▲[[Nguyễn Xuân Phúc]]<br>[[Nguyễn Phú Trọng]]<br>[[Trần Đại Quang]]<br>[[Tô Lâm]]<br>[[Ngô Xuân Lịch]]
| fatalities = 1 protester dead
| injuries = A few police officers and protesters
Line 61 ⟶ 56:
The '''2018 Vietnam protests''', '''June 10 Events''', or '''Protests against the Special Zone Act and the Cybersecurity Law''' ([[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]]: [[:vi:Biểu tình phản đối Luật đặc khu kinh tế và Luật An ninh mạng|Biểu tình phản đối Luật đặc khu kinh tế và Luật An ninh mạng]]), are a series of both violent and nonviolent protests that erupted across Vietnam in June 2018, chiefly in response to two drafted pieces of legislation: the Special Zone Act and the Cybersecurity Law.
The Special Zone Act<ref>{{Cite web| last = ASEAN briefing| title = Special economic zones in ASEAN: opportunities for US investors| work = ASEAN Business News|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2020-06-04| url = https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/special-economic-zones-in-asean-opportunities-for-us-investors/}}</ref> (also known as the Special Zones Law<ref>{{Cite news| last = China Dialogue| title = Public criticism pressures Vietnam to back down on new economic zones| work = China Dialogue|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2019-03-26| url = https://chinadialogue.net/en/business/11154-public-criticism-pressures-vietnam-to-back-down-on-new-economic-zones/}}</ref> or the Special Economic Zones Law<ref>{{Cite web| last = Trang| first = Doan| title = FAQs about the Special Economic Zones and Vietnam's SEZ draft bill| work = thevietnamese.org| date = 28 August 2018|access-date= 2021-04-10| url = https://www.thevietnamese.org/2018/08/faqs-about-the-special-economic-zones-and-vietnams-sez-draft-bill/}}</ref>) proposes the opening of three [[special economic zones]] (SEZs) across Vietnam, where foreign investors would be allowed to lease land for up to 99 years. Despite no specific mention of China within the lines of the bill, many Vietnamese feared that the SEZs would be dominated by
The Cybersecurity Law
==Context==
===Protest culture in Vietnam===
To mainstream media and many nongovernmental organizations, Vietnam is often perceived as harsh and uncompromising regarding the right to freedom of assembly. Reports from [[Human Rights Watch]] and the US State Department depict the ruling [[Communist Party of Vietnam]] (CPV) as extremely illiberal and unforgiving of political dissent of any kind.<ref>{{Cite conference| last = Human Rights Watch| title = Vietnam: Country Summary| location = New York| series = World Report 2013|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2013| url = https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/vietnam_9.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite conference| last = US Department of State| title = 2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam| series = 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2011| url = https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/160484.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite conference| last = US Department of State| title = 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam| series = 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2018| url = https://www.state.gov/reports/2018-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/vietnam/}}</ref> [[Freedom House]]’s report on Vietnam in 2020 scores the country at 1 out of 4 for freedom of assembly, specifically citing the arrests and convictions as a result of the 2018 protests as the reason for its score, and 0 out of 4 for freedom for nongovernmental organizations and trade unions or similar professional organizations.<ref>{{Cite conference| last = Freedom House| title = Vietnam: Freedom in the World 2020 Country Report|access-date= 2021-04-10| url = https://freedomhouse.org/country/vietnam/freedom-world/2020}}</ref> [[Amnesty International]] also reports harassment
Scholars and observers of Vietnam, however, have a different outlook. Many agree that the country has actually been exercising a responsive-repressive strategy since the 1990s, taking certain measures to show its responsiveness and tolerance to criticism from its citizens and exercising repression only as a last resort.<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1080/09512748.2016.1201132| issn = 0951-2748| volume = 30| issue = 2| pages = 169–187| last = Bui| first = Nhung T.| title = Managing anti-China nationalism in Vietnam: evidence from the media during the 2014 oil rig crisis| journal = The Pacific Review|access-date= 2021-03-06| date = 2017-03-04| s2cid = 156373670| url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2016.1201132}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| volume = 13| issue = 1| pages = 61–69| last1 = Ciorciari| first1 = John D| last2 = Weiss| first2 = Jessica Chen| title = The Sino-Vietnamese standoff in the South China Sea| journal = Georgetown Journal of International Affairs| date = 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1525/as.2015.55.1.165| issn = 0004-4687| volume = 55| issue = 1| pages = 165–173| last1 = Malesky| first1 = Edmund| last2 = Morris-Jung| first2 = Jason| title = Vietnam in 2014| journal = Asian Survey|access-date= 2021-03-06| date = 2015-02-01| url = https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article/55/1/165/24778/Vietnam-in-2014Uncertainty-and-Opportunity-in-the}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1080/10670564.2020.1852737| issn = 1067-0564| pages = 613–629| last = Ross| first = Robert S.| title = China-Vietnamese relations in the era of rising China: power, resistance, and maritime conflict| journal = Journal of Contemporary China|access-date= 2021-03-07| date = 2020-12-07| volume = 30| issue = 130| s2cid = 230609101| url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10670564.2020.1852737}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| volume = 9| issue = 4| pages = 33–66| last = Vu| first = Tuong| title = The party v. the people: anti-China nationalism in contemporary Vietnam| journal = Journal of Vietnamese Studies| date = 2014| doi = 10.1525/vs.2014.9.4.33}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1080/10670564.2019.1580429| issn = 1067-0564| volume = 28| issue = 119| pages = 712–728| last1 = Wang| first1 = Frances Yaping| last2 = Womack| first2 = Brantly| title = Jawing through crises: Chinese and Vietnamese media strategies in the South China Sea| journal = Journal of Contemporary China|access-date= 2021-03-06| date = 2019-09-03| s2cid = 159174351| url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10670564.2019.1580429}}</ref> Political scientist and Emeritus Professor at the Australian National University [[Ben Kerkvliet]] found that Vietnamese citizens “frequently and publicly” spoke out in criticism of their living and working conditions, most often through thousands of strikes, occasionally with thousands of participants each.<ref>{{Cite book| publisher = Cornell University Press| last = Kerkvliet| first = Benedict J. Tria| title = Speaking out in Vietnam: public political criticism in a communist party-ruled nation| date = 2019}}</ref> His 2019 book ''Speaking Out in Vietnam: public political criticism in a communist party-ruled nation'' showed that at least since 1990, public political criticism has evolved into a prominent feature of Vietnam's political landscape. In the book, he also showed how government officials were in reality often sympathetic to workers’ demands, accommodating to concerns with land confiscation, and even to some extent tolerating calls for democratization that threatened the ideology of the regime.
===Past anti-China protests in Vietnam===
{{
Although public demonstrations are not common in Vietnam, anti-China protests has occurred on numerous occasions and are met with a balance of responsiveness and repression by the state, albeit with extra caution given the addition of an external party – China, no less – into the state-society relationship in Vietnam.
Among the Vietnamese populace, anti-China sentiments act as a converging space for their dissatisfaction with a variety of social issues in the country such as unfavorable labour conditions, environmental pollution, socio-economic development, and foreign policy. Placing China as a ‘common enemy’ thereby acts as a linkage between these social groups with mutual encouragement and reinforcement of these sentiments.<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1177/186810341503400305| issn = 1868-1034| volume = 34| issue = 3| pages = 123–150| last = Kurfürst| first = Sandra| title = Networking alone? Digital communications and collective action in Vietnam| journal = Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs| date = 2015-12-01| s2cid = 156716830| doi-access = free}}</ref>
In May 2011, for instance, a Chinese maritime vessel cut the cables of a Vietnamese ship conducting research operating in Vietnamese waters in the South China Sea, and hundreds in Vietnam took to the streets for over three months in sustained protest.<ref>{{Cite news
Such territorial disputes are particularly affective because they are viewed as challenges and violations of Vietnam’s sovereignty, an especially sore subject when it comes to China given the history of border clashes between the two countries until 1991, such as the two-month bloody [[Sino-Vietnamese border war]] not four decades prior in 1979.<ref>{{Cite news
====Vietnamese state response====
Line 91 ⟶ 86:
Regarding the South China Sea in particular, Vietnam pursues a strategy of ‘cooperation and struggle’ with China<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1177/2347797016645453| issn = 2347-7970| volume = 3| issue = 2| pages = 200–220| last = Thayer| first = Carlyle A.| title = Vietnam's strategy of 'cooperating and struggling' with China over maritime disputes in the South China Sea| journal = Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2016-08-01| s2cid = 156997593| url = https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797016645453}}</ref> – for instance, engaging in a defence self-help programme at home with deliveries of [[:kilo-class submarine|kilo-class submarines]] while engaging major powers including the United States, Russia, India, and Japan to maintain the power balance in the Sea.<ref>{{Cite journal| issn = 0129-797X| volume = 33| issue = 3| pages = 348–369| last = Thayer| first = Carlyle A.| title = The tyranny of geography: Vietnamese strategies to constrain China in the South China Sea| journal = Contemporary Southeast Asia|access-date= 2021-03-06| date = December 2011| doi = 10.1355/cs33-3d| url = https://www.proquest.com/docview/921618975| id = {{ProQuest|921618975}}}}</ref> While the anti-China protests did not change Vietnam’s foreign policy towards China both during the disputes or in the long-term,<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1177/2347797019826747| issn = 2347-7970| volume = 6| issue = 1| pages = 1–29| last = Hoang| first = Phuong| title = Domestic protests and foreign policy: an examination of anti-China protests in Vietnam and Vietnamese policy towards China regarding the South China Sea| journal = Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs| date = 2019-04-01| s2cid = 159373995| doi-access = free}}</ref> the pressure was successfully manipulated for Vietnam’s benefit, with the United States acceding the sale of equipment and weapons for maritime defense purposes, India extending a $100 million credit line for defense procurement, and Japan providing six maritime vessels and training to Vietnam’s coast guard (and with improved relations) during the crises.<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1525/as.2015.55.1.165| issn = 0004-4687| volume = 55| issue = 1| pages = 165–173| last1 = Malesky| first1 = Edmund| last2 = Morris-Jung| first2 = Jason| title = Vietnam in 2014| journal = Asian Survey|access-date= 2021-03-06| date = 2015-02-01| url = https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article/55/1/165/24778/Vietnam-in-2014Uncertainty-and-Opportunity-in-the}}</ref>
All in all, within this trio – the Vietnamese people, the Vietnamese government, and the Chinese government – it is all about preserving a delicate balance between appeasing protests and approving of nationalism while maintaining the negotiated asymmetry and avoiding harm to bilateral relations.<ref>{{Cite news
==Background==
Line 98 ⟶ 93:
While the demonstrations were generally peaceful in most cities, there were incidents of violence and destruction in the Binh Thuan province, where protesters stormed government buildings, set vehicles on fire, and grappled with police forces.<ref>{{Cite book| publisher = ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute| isbn = 978-981-4843-15-7| pages = 375–393| last1 = Singh| first1 = Daljit| last2 = Cook| first2 = Malcolm| last3 = Vuving| first3 = Alexander L.| title = Southeast Asian Affairs 2019| chapter = Vietnam in 2018: a rent-seeking state on correction course| date = 2019-04-10}}</ref> According to a source from Reuters, the reaction was particularly bitter in Binh Thuan as anger had already been festering for years in the province – its residents blame China for assaulting local fishermen, polluting the area with a Chinese-built power plant, and deforesting the land to mine minerals primarily exported to China.<ref>{{Cite news| last = Petty| first = Martin| title = In Vietnam, distrust of government's China policy fuels protests| work = Reuters|access-date= 2021-04-09| date = 2018-06-20| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vietnam-protests-analysis-idUSKBN1JF0VU}}</ref> Binh Thuan residents were not only venting fury towards China but also towards the local government, whom they perceived as corrupt and enslaved by destructive Chinese commercial interests.
As a facet of the protests targeted Chinese workers and Chinese-owned factories in particular, China’s diplomatic missions in Vietnam held meetings with Chinese business groups, local government and local media. The website of the Chinese Embassy in Vietnam posted that
===Special Zone Act===
Line 105 ⟶ 100:
The specific provision that triggered the anti-China protests was a clause in the bill that would allow 99-year leases of land to foreign investors. Although the draft law did not specify any particular country, it was widely presumed that Chinese investors would be the most likely beneficiaries<ref>{{Cite web| last = South China Morning Post| title = Vietnamese see special economic zones as assault from China| work = South China Morning Post|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-06-07| url = https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2149785/vietnamese-see-special-economic-zones-assault-china}}</ref> given their deep pockets and close proximity, potentially turning the areas into de facto Chinese territories. Vietnam has also been a preferred treasure hunting ground for Chinese buyers in recent years.<ref>{{Cite web| last = The Diplomat| title = SEZs in Vietnam: What's in a Name?|access-date= 2021-04-11| url = https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/sezs-in-vietnam-whats-in-a-name/}}</ref> Existing anti-Chinese sentiments only served to embolden this connection between the act and China. Nguyen Chi Tuyen, a Hanoi-based blogger with 42,500 Facebook followers, was quoted as saying, “We have a long history with the Chinese people, they always want to invade our country, so it is dangerous to allow them to use these SEZs to control our country”.<ref>{{Cite web| last = Fawthrop| first = Tom| title = Vietnam Mass Protests Expose Hanoi's China Dilemma|access-date= 2021-04-11| url = https://thediplomat.com/2018/06/vietnam-mass-protests-expose-hanois-china-dilemma/}}</ref> Nguyen Quang Dy, an analyst who was a former foreign ministry official, published an article criticizing the proposed SEZs, writing: “While Vietnam’s economic interests and sovereignty in the South China Sea are seriously threatened by China, the decision to set up new SEZs at these critical positions would be inexcusable for either economic or national security reasons.”<ref>{{Cite web| last = Nguyen Quang Dy| title = The Paradoxes of Special Economic Zones| work = Jonathan London's Blog|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-06-05| url = http://blog.jonathanlondon.net/nguyen-quang-dy-the-paradoxes-of-special-economic-zones/}}</ref>
As the rumor of China’s imminent exploitation of the act continued to spread and public dissatisfaction demonstrated, party officials hastened to rebuke such fears. Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan attempted to calm the outrage by appealing to the protesters, saying that the people should “believe in the decisions of the party and the state, especially in the fact that the National Assembly is always listening to the people’s opinions when discussing the bills”.<ref>{{Cite news
The act eventually succumbed to pressure and was postponed indefinitely.
===Cybersecurity Law===
The Cybersecurity Law, on the other hand, was overwhelmingly passed on 12 June 2018 despite huge local and international opposition, with approving votes from 91% of attending legislators.<ref>{{Cite news| last = Nguyen| first = Mai| title = Vietnam lawmakers approve cyber law clamping down on tech firms, dissent| work = Reuters|access-date= 2021-04-09| date = 2018-06-12| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vietnam-socialmedia-idUSKBN1J80AE}}</ref> The law grants the government sweeping powers to control online information and police online activity including potentially forcing technology company to hand over vast amounts of data including personal information and censoring users’ posts,<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1080/09512748.2016.1201132| issn = 0951-2748| volume = 30| issue = 2| pages = 169–187| last = Bui| first = Nhung T.| title = Managing anti-China nationalism in Vietnam: evidence from the media during the 2014 oil rig crisis| journal = The Pacific Review|access-date= 2021-03-06| date = 2017-03-04| s2cid = 156373670| url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2016.1201132}}</ref> and banning Internet users from organizing for anti-state purposes.<ref>{{Cite web| last = The ASEAN Post| title = Vietnam's new cybersecurity laws a threat to freedom| work = The ASEAN Post|access-date= 2021-04-11| url = https://theaseanpost.com/article/vietnams-new-cybersecurity-laws-threat-freedom}}</ref> Many articles are ambiguously worded and allow for broad manipulation and interpretation by authorities – Article 8 and 15 of the law, for example, could lead people to being charged for extremely vague offenses such as “negating the revolution achievement” or giving “misleading information causing confusion among the people”.<ref>{{Cite web| last = Amnesty International| title = Viet Nam: Proposed cybersecurity law threatens to stamp out online freedom|access-date= 2021-04-11| url = https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/06/viet-nam-proposed-cybersecurity-law-threatens-to-stamp-out-online-freedom/}}</ref> Before the law was passed, the United States and Canada had urged Vietnam to delay the vote for further review to ensure that it met global standards, voicing concerns that it may hurt digital innovation in Vietnam.<ref>{{Cite news
The justification provided by the CPV paints the law as a necessity for the protection of the party and the regime; as General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong proclaimed, “During this time period of 4.0 industrial revolution, there are many benefits but, on the other hand, management is very difficult. From this come instigations, protests, disruptions, regime overthrows. Therefore, there needs to be law to protect this regime.”<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1080/10758216.2020.1783562| issn = 1075-8216| pages = 202–215| last1 = Wang| first1 = Juan| last2 = Truong| first2 = Nhu| title = Law for what? Ideas and social control in China and Vietnam| journal = Problems of Post-Communism|access-date= 2021-03-06| date = 2020-07-07| volume = 68| issue = 3| s2cid = 221762018| url = https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10758216.2020.1783562}}</ref> The Cybersecurity Law too sparked similar anti-China sentiments as it is commonly criticized as a duplicate of its Chinese counterpart passed in 2017,<ref>{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1017/S0021911818002504| issn = 0021-9118| volume = 77| issue = 4| pages = 895–908| last = Nguyen-Thu| first = Giang| title = Vietnamese media going social: connectivism, collectivism, and conservatism| journal = The Journal of Asian Studies| date = November 2018| s2cid = 165573753| doi-access = free}}</ref> with Vietnam mimicking China’s approach to internet governance out of a desire to better control online spaces and information flows.<ref>{{Cite web| last = The Diplomat| title = Vietnam's Internet Control: Following in China's Footsteps?|access-date= 2021-04-11| url = https://thediplomat.com/2019/12/vietnams-internet-control-following-in-chinas-footsteps/}}</ref>
Line 136 ⟶ 131:
'''9-10 June (Saturday and Sunday)''': The demonstrations began with around 50,000 Vietnamese from a footwear factory taking to the streets of Ho Chi Minh City to protest against the two draft bills.<ref>{{Cite web| last = Vu Quoc Ngu| title = Mass protests sweep Vietnam for the first time in decades| work = Waging Nonviolence|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-06-22| url = https://wagingnonviolence.org/2018/06/vietnam-protests-economic-zones-cyber-security/}}</ref> This soon spread across provinces in Vietnam. State media reported that protesters in the central province of Binh Thuan threw petrol bombs and bricks at police and damaged local government offices (reportedly the provincial People’s Committee headquarters) and vehicles. Dozens of policemen were injured in the incident.<ref>{{Cite web| last = Deutsche Welle| title = Vietnamese protest amid fear of Chinese investment in special economic zones| work = DW.COM|access-date= 2021-04-11| url = https://www.dw.com/en/vietnamese-protest-amid-fear-of-chinese-investment-in-special-economic-zones/a-44146611}}</ref>
Posts by activists on social media reported police beatings and detentions by plainclothes officers. Riot police used tear gas, smoke bombs, and water cannons to disperse protesters in Binh Thuan province, and arrested over a hundred people.<ref>{{Cite web| last = Human Rights Watch| title = Vietnam: Investigate Police Response to Mass Protests| work = Human Rights Watch|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-06-15| url = https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/06/15/vietnam-investigate-police-response-mass-protests}}</ref> In the capital Hanoi, police detained more than a dozen protesters who marched down a busy street, some carrying anti-Chinese banners including one that said “No leasing land to China even for one day”. Dozens of protesters were also detained in the country’s economic hub, Ho Chi Minh City.<ref>{{Cite news
An American citizen who took part in the protests in Ho Chi Minh City, Will Nguyen, was among the arrested. He had posted a series of tweets documenting the protests on Sunday. According to a statement from his family and friends, he was “beaten over the head and dragged into the back of a police truck” as the police cracked down on the protests.<ref>{{Cite news| issn = 0362-4331| last = Ramzy| first = Austin| title = American is detained after joining protest in Vietnam| work = The New York Times|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-06-14| url = https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/world/asia/will-nguyen-vietnam-american-protest.html}}</ref> A spokesman for the United States Embassy in Hanoi said that the embassy were aware of the arrest and would work to provide the appropriate consular assistance.
'''11 June (Monday)''': Protests in the cities were quickly suppressed, but those in Binh Thuan continued. Police formed barricades with their shields across town roads and tear gas was fired into the crowd.<ref>{{Cite news| last = BBC News| title = Vietnam detains 100 after anti-China economic zone protests turn violent| work = BBC News|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-06-11| url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-44436019}}</ref> Police arrested another 100 people on the night of 11 June, and it was unclear how many protesters from the weekend were released.<ref>{{Cite news
'''12 June (Tuesday)''': State media reported on Tuesday that tensions in Binh Thuan province had subsided.<ref>{{Cite news
'''15 June (Friday)''': On Friday, then-house speaker Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan responded vaguely to statements about the protests, saying that the legislature “appreciates the people’s patriotism and their profound concerns about important issues.”<ref>{{Cite news| last = Petty| first = Martin| title = In Vietnam, distrust of government's China policy fuels protests| work = Reuters|access-date= 2021-04-09| date = 2018-06-20| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vietnam-protests-analysis-idUSKBN1JF0VU}}</ref>
Line 148 ⟶ 143:
'''17 June (Sunday)''': In central Vietnam, there were reports of peaceful demonstrations without police clashes; in southern Vietnam, reports were of violent crackdowns.
Reuters reported that in central Ha Tinh province, thousands of people demonstrated peacefully against both laws. Protesters held signs that said “No leasing land to Chinese communists for even one day” or “Cybersecurity law kills freedom”. This was confirmed by three witnesses and livestream footages on Facebook.<ref>{{Cite news
In Southern Vietnam however, on the same day, posts on social media and from multiple activists reported that authorities took some 180 people, including active protesters and passive observers, to Tao Dao stadium in Ho Chi Minh City.<ref>{{Cite conference| last = US Department of State| title = 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam| series = 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2018| url = https://www.state.gov/reports/2018-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/vietnam/}}</ref> Some activists said that they were not protesting but were taken by authorities from their homes or cafes to the stadium anyway. Authorities searched and beat the detained. Many of those involved said they sustained injuries to the head, and some lost consciousness. One individual required long-term hospitalization for his injuries.
Line 154 ⟶ 149:
'''18 June (Monday)''': Vietnamese police arrested eight more people from Binh Thuan, accusing them of disturbing public order, opposing officials and damaging state property.<ref>{{Cite web| last = AP News| title = Vietnam arrests 8 people after economic zone law protests| work = AP NEWS|access-date= 2021-04-09| date = 2018-06-18| url = https://apnews.com/article/dcadb5b9b07446a4aba9588b9d6b811a}}</ref>
'''12 July''': A court in Binh Thuan province jailed six Vietnamese over “disturbing public order” through their participation in the protests, with sentences
'''20 July''': A Vietnamese court ordered the release and deportation of Will Nguyen immediately after his one-day trial on the same day. State-run newspaper Ho Chi Minh City Law reported that he was not given a prison sentence due to his admittance to his charged offences and sincerity.<ref>{{Cite news| last1 = Vu| first1 = Khanh| last2 = Pearson| first2 = James| title = Vietnam to deport American detained during nationwide protests| work = Reuters|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-07-20| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/cnews-us-vietnam-usa-protests-trial-idCAKBN1KA0AQ-OCATP}}</ref> A spokesperson at the United States Embassy in Hanoi said in a statement that they were “pleased that the case of U.S. citizen William Nguyen has been resolved”. Mike Pompeo later tweeted that he was “tremendously pleased” that Nguyen would be returning home to his family.<ref>{{Cite web| last = AP News| title = Vietnam convicts, deports US man who joined rare protest| work = AP NEWS|access-date= 2021-04-11| date = 2018-07-20| url = https://apnews.com/article/711a1be675a34360b8013428e99195fd}}</ref>
'''23 July''': A court in Binh Thuan province jailed another ten Vietnamese protesters, aged between 18 and 43, over “causing public disorder”, with sentences
'''2 August''': Reports stated that a protester, Hua Hoang Anh, died on 2 August after local police officers in Kien Giang Province interrogated him concerning his participation in the protests. Social media and nongovernmental organizations reported that there were many injuries to his body, including to his head, neck, and belly, possibly indicating torture.<ref>{{Cite conference| last = US Department of State| title = 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Vietnam| series = 2018 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices|access-date= 2021-04-10| date = 2018| url = https://www.state.gov/reports/2018-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/vietnam/}}</ref> State-run media only stated that he had died.
'''4 September:''' [[Huỳnh Trương Ca]], a member of the Hiến Pháp group who organised protests in Ho Chi Minh City, is arrested. Over the next month, eight further members of Hiến Pháp are arrested.<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 August 2024 |title=Free Vietnam’s Political Prisoners! |url=https://www.hrw.org/video-photos/interactive/2024/08/07/free-vietnams-political-prisoners |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240808163533/https://www.hrw.org/video-photos/interactive/2024/08/07/free-vietnams-political-prisoners |archive-date=8 August 2024 |access-date=11 August 2024 |website=[[Human Rights Watch]] |language=en}}</ref>
==See also==
Line 174 ⟶ 171:
[[Category:2018 protests]]
[[Category:No-U Movement]]
[[Category:Labor disputes in Vietnam]]
|