Center for Union Facts: Difference between revisions

The '''Center for Union Facts''' ('''CUF''') is an American [[interest group]] that is critical of [[trade union|labor unions]]. It is one of several advocacy and public relations groups founded by [[Richard Berman (lawyer)|Richard Berman]], whose [[Washington, D.C.]]-based–based [[Lobbying|public affairs]] firm, [[Berman and Company]], specializes in research, communications and advertising. ''The Washington Post'' describes CUF as "part of a constellation of nonprofit groups Berman created to carry out corporate messages."<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/center-for-union-facts-says-randi-weingarten-is-ruining-nations-schools/2014/09/24/6443fed4-441e-11e4-9a15-137aa0153527_story.html|title=Center for Union Facts says Randi Weingarten, head of teachers union, is ruining the nation’snation's schools|last=Layton|first=Lyndsey|date=2014-09-24|work=The Washington Post|accessdateaccess-date=2017-05-18}}</ref>

CUF was launched in February 2006 via full-page [[advertisement]]s in major [[U.S. newspapers]], including ''[[The New York Times]]'', ''[[The Washington Post]]'' and ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''. In May 2006, the organization aired its first [[television advertisement]]. The 30-second spot, running on [[Fox News Channel]] and local markets, featured "actors posing as workers" saying "what they 'love' about unions", like paying dues, union leaders' "fat-cat lifestyles" and discrimination against minorities. The advertising campaign cost US$3 million, raised "from companies, foundations and individuals that Mr. Berman won't identify".<ref name=WSJ>{{cite news | work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] | title=Anti-Union Group Takes Message to the Airwaves | last=Maher |first=Kim |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB114799623004157251?mod=todays_us_marketplace |format=Article |date=19 May 2006 |accessdateaccess-date=21 December 2008}}</ref>

Another TV advertisement (aired on [[CNN]] and other stations) shows actors posing as large, burly "union leaders" muscling their way into a worker's home and "intimidating" him into joining the union.<ref name="BlueOregon">{{cite web | title="Union Facts": Pure Fiction | last=Chamberlain |first=Tom | url=http://www.blueoregon.com/2006/08/union_facts_pur.html |work=Gueast column |publisherwebsite=[[BlueOregon]] |date=24 August 2006 |format=Blog |accessdateaccess-date=21 December 2008}}</ref> the [[Labour (economics)|labor]] and [[economics]] [[professor]] [[Harley Shaiken]] said the effort "to create an antiunion atmosphere" more generally, as opposed to business-funded advertising against a particular union organizing drive or strike, "is a new wrinkle". An [[AFL-CIO]] spokesperson called the advertisement's accusations "unfounded and outrageous".<ref name=WSJ/>

In August 2006, the CUF ran a series of advertisements in [[Montana]], [[Oregon]], [[Michigan]] and [[Nevada]] attacking public employee unions. It appears that this may have been connected with ballot initiatives in those states proposing public spending caps.<ref name=Hogan>{{cite web |url=http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/pressclip.php?view=3103 |last=Hogan |first=Dave |publisherwork=[[The Oregonian]] |date=26 August 2006 |title=Anti-union ads appear in media in Oregon |format=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington|CREW]] archive |accessdateaccess-date=21 December 2008 |url-status=dead |archiveurlarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070204014247/http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/pressclip.php?view=3103 |archivedatearchive-date=4 February 2007 }}</ref>

The CUF ran an ad in 2008 noting that the [[Service Employees' International Union]] had been the largest contributor to the 2006 gubernatorial campaign of corrupt Illinois Gov. [[Rod Blagojevich]], who, after his election, had signed the state's first-ever contract with the SIEU. The ad also noted the SEIU's donations to Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and its ties to [[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now|ACORN]].<ref name="youtube.com">{{cite web|last1=Wilson|first1=J Justin|title=J. Justin Wilson talks about the SEIU on Lou Dobbs|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZd18XN5v1k |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/xZd18XN5v1k |archive-date=2021-12-21 |url-status=live|website=YouTube|accessdateaccess-date=19 February 2015|date=2008}}{{cbignore}}</ref>

The CUF describes itself as having “compiled the single most comprehensive database of information about labor unions in the United States. The database contains more than 100 million facts, ranging from basic union finances and leader salaries, to political operations, to strikes and unfair labor practices, and much more. The data comes from various local, state, and federal government agencies that track labor union operations.” Among the material available at the website is information about various unions' finances, political and lobbying activity, and criminal history.<ref name="Union Profiles">{{cite web|title=Union Profiles|url=http://www.unionfacts.com/cuf/|website=UnionFacts.com|publisher=Center for Union Facts|accessdateaccess-date=19 February 2015|date=2015}}</ref>

Representatives of the CUF have discussed issues on Fox Business, CNN, CNBC, and other cable news networks.<ref name="youtube.com"/><ref>{{cite web|last1=Wilson|first1=Justin J|title=J. Justin Wilson debates union pension funds on CNBC|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnD4l0gMseg&feature=relmfu; |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/CnD4l0gMseg |archive-date=2021-12-21 |url-status=live|website=YouTube.com|publisher=YouTube|date=2009}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Berman: Union Leaders Part of Tax Problem|url=http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1190411287001/berman-union-leaders-part-of-tax-problem/|website=video.foxbusiness.com|publisher=Fox News|date=2011}}</ref>

The Center for Union Facts was active in fighting the passage of the [[Employee Free Choice Act]],<ref name=FreeChoice>{{cite web |url=http://www.unionfacts.com/news.cfm?id=41 |author=UnionFacts.com |publisher=Center for Union Facts |title=Congressman Miller: Voting to End Voting |date=7 February 2007 |format=Press release |accessdateaccess-date=21 December 2008 |url-status=dead |archiveurlarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016122652/http://unionfacts.com/news.cfm?id=41 |archivedatearchive-date=16 October 2007 }}</ref> which would let workers decide on unionization by signing cards, without their employers' knowledge, instead of by casting secret ballots.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Maher|first1=Kris|last2=Mullins|first2=Brody|title=Unionizing Fight Focuses on 3 States|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123733320541163447|website=www.wsj.com|publisherwork=The Wall Street Journal|date=2009}}</ref>

CUF pledged in December 2011 to spend $10 million promoting the so-called Employee Rights Act sponsored by Utah Senator [[Orrin Hatch]] and South Carolina Congressman [[Tim Scott]]. The ERA’s provisions, wrote ''[[In These Times (publication)|In These Times]]'', “are an anti-union wish list, including restricting 'non-representation' spending by unions, banning any union recognition process other than an NLRB election, and requiring members to vote every three years on whether to eliminate their union.”<ref>{{cite web|last1=Eidelson|first1=Josh |title=Center for Union Facts Steps Up $10 Million Ad Campaign Backing Broad Anti-Union Bill |url=http://www.inthesetimes.com/working/entry/12607/center_for_union_facts_rick_berman_anti-union_campaign_era_orrin_hatch_elec/|website=InTheseTimes.com|publisher=IN THESE TIMES AND THE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS|date=2012}}</ref>

In an op-ed that appeared in the''[[The Washington Times]]'' in August 2012, Berman championed the Employee Rights Act, which, he noted, “extends guarantees to union members in the private sector to decide whether their dues money is spent for political purposes, otherwise known as 'paycheck protection.'” He also noted that union leaders had “partially boycott[ed] the Democratic National Convention,” angered over the decision to hold it in North Carolina, “a right-to-work state that is proudly the least unionized in the country.”<ref>{{cite web|last1=Berman|first1=Rick|title=BERMAN: Union thugs crying about Democratic convention|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/14/union-thugs-crying-about-democratic-convention/|website=WashingtonTimes.com|publisherwork=The Washington Times|date=2012}}</ref>

CUF played a role in supporting Wisconsin governor Scott Walker against the unsuccessful 2012 effort to recall him over the issue of public-employee unions. A CUF spokesperson said in early March that it was spending “just over a million dollars” on running TV ads in Wisconsin, and “may do more in the coming weeks.”<ref>{{cite web|last1=Eidelson|first1=Josh|title=Union-buster joins Wisconsin recall fight|url=http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/union_buster_joins_wisconsin_recall_fight/|website=Salon.com|publisheragency=The Associated Press|date=2012}}</ref> After the controversy over Walker, Berman exposed an internal Wisconsin Education Association Council document instructing teachers in the “do's” and “don't's” of winning public sympathy.

None took CUF up on its offer, and so the winners' names were not revealed, although CUF did publish details about them: one had been jailed for waving a gun at a fast-food waitress, another was a sexual molester, a third “had sex with two of her male teen students.” The goal of the contest “was to illustrate how difficult unions have made it to get rid of bad teachers.”<ref>{{cite web|title=Ten Worst Union-Protected Teachers Contest|url=http://teachersunionexposed.com/ten-worst-contest.cfm|website=TeachersUnionExposed.com|publisher=Center for Union Facts|date=2015|url-status=dead|archiveurlarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221193450/http://teachersunionexposed.com/ten-worst-contest.cfm|archivedatearchive-date=2015-02-21}}</ref>

In August 2010, the CUF ran an ad in the [[Washington, DCD.C.]], area about the Washington Teachers' Union (WTU). “D.C.'s teachers union has failed our kids, played politics and now is threatening to file a lawsuit to block recent progress,” said the ad's voice-over. Sarah Longwell of the CUF said the ad campaign had been launched in response to recent threats by the WTU to sue to prevent the firing of bad teachers. “As soon as we saw that they were threatening to file a lawsuit, we thought a response was necessary,” Longwell said.<ref>{{cite webnews|last1=DeBonis|first1=Mik|title=With TV and print ads, group takes aim at WTU|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/debonis/2010/08/with_tv_and_print_ads_group_ta.html|websitearchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221193237/http://voices.washingtonpost.com/debonis/2010/08/with_tv_and_print_ads_group_ta.html|publisherurl-status=Thedead|archive-date=February 21, 2015|newspaper=Washington Post|date=2010}}</ref>

''[[The Washington Post]]'' ran an article on September 24, 2014, headlined “Center for Union Facts says Randi Weingarten is ruining nation’s schools.” The article, by Lyndsey Layton, cited a mailing by CUF in which Berman spoke of the “terrible impact” that Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, had had “on America’s educational system.” The mailing called Weingarten “a vicious individual” who was “on a crusade to stymie school reform and protect the jobs of incompetent teachers — theteachers—the bad apples that drain so much of our tax resources and sabotage the efforts of parents and caring teachers.”<ref name="The Washington Post">{{cite web|last1=Layton|first1=Lyndsey|title=Center for Union Facts says Randi Weingarten is ruining nation’snation's schools|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/center-for-union-facts-says-randi-weingarten-is-ruining-nations-schools/2014/09/24/6443fed4-441e-11e4-9a15-137aa0153527_story.html|website=WashingtonPost.com|publisherwork=The Washington Post|date=2014}}</ref>

==''The Washington Times'' article==

''The Washington Times'' published an article in 2012 about Berman and CUF, noting Berman's desire to “have a regular vote” to determine whether union members, 90 percent of whom never had a chance to vote for or against organizing, actually want to be union members. CUF supported the Employee Rights Act, which “would require workers to reauthorize their unions every three years. With a vote, they could move forward with the union, disband it or form a new one.” Berman argued: “If a congressman has to stand for re-election every two years and the president every four years, why should the unions be basically given lifetime status in that workforce?” His larger goal, said the times, was to change “the cultural mindset toward the labor movement in America.”<ref>{{cite web|last1=Devaney|first1=Tim|title=Berman turns his eye to battling big labor|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/14/berman-turns-his-eye-battling-big-labor/|website=WashingtonTimes.com|publisherwork=The Washington Times|date=2012}}</ref>

===''Chicago Tribune'' ad===

The ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' refused in August 2012 to run an ad by the CUF on the grounds that it had “racial undertones.” The ad featured a famous image of George Wallace blocking a door at the University of Alabama, and said that teachers unions now, like Wallace back then, are blocking the door to real school reform. Berman said that “the message of the ad has nothing to do with race--only with the efforts of teachers unions to block students from getting a good education.”<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bier|first1=Jeryl|title=Kerry: World is 'On Track To Warm At Least 4 Degrees' in 20-40 Years|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/keyword/Facts|websitearchive-url=WeeklyStandardhttps://web.archive.org/web/20121218111954/http://www.weeklystandard.com/keyword/Facts|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 18, 2012|publisherwork=The Weekly Standard|date=2014}}</ref>

In an op-ed that appeared in the''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' on February 25, 2013, Berman wrote that many labor unions supported a minimum-wage hike because those unions “peg their base-line wages to the minimum wage” or have job contracts stipulating that “following a minimum-wage increase, the union and the employer reopen wage talks.” He added that such hikes also “restrict the ability of businesses to hire low-skill workers who might gladly work for lower wages in order to gain experience,” thus preventing “competition from workers who might threaten union jobs.” He cited a 2004 study showing that “lower-wage union workers typically see a boost in employment and earned income following a mandated wage hike,” even as nonunion minimum-wage workers experience a “corresponding drop in jobs and earned income.”<ref>{{cite webnews|last1=Berman|first1=Richard|title=Why Unions Want a Higher Minimum Wage|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324048904578318541000422454|website=www.wsj.com|publisherwork=The Wall Street Journal|date=25 February 2013}}</ref>

A ''[[Detroit]] News]]'' editorial published on January 30, 2015, attributed the widespread decline in U.S. union membership in large part to “the quality of union services” and cited the CUF's view that unions are “used to monopoly status and now they have to deal with competition.” The editorial also expressed agreement with CUF's argument that “right“[[right to work]] doesn't mean unions have to throw up their hands in despair,” as demonstrated by “effective unions in right-to-work states like Texas and Virginia,” which “have retooled to focus more on member concerns and less on ideological and political battles.”<ref>{{cite web|title=In right-to-work era, unions must add more value|url=http://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2015/01/29/unions-must-offer-value/22543809/|website=DetroitNews.com|publisherwork=The Detroit News|date=2015}}</ref>

In a February 2015 op-ed, Berman dismissed the notion that labor unions were undergoing a renaissance, stating that they were, rather, experiencing “a temporary boost thanks to a Labor Board that’s operating as the legal wing of the [[AFL-CIO]],” even as worker interest in unionization was at a historic low. “Though unions refuse to acknowledge it,” he wrote, “the reality is that employees are rejecting them because they’re still peddling the same industrial warfare rhetoric to a workforce for whom it’s no longer relevant. It’s as if Kodak was still trying to sell 35mm cameras in an age of smart phones — they might have been popular and even necessary at one point, but the world has moved on.”

He also cited “the sizable (and growing) political disconnect between many current union members and their leaderships: While roughly 40 percent of union members vote Republican, up to 99 percent of union dues used to support ideological organizations are given to Democrat-aligned left-wing groups.”<ref>{{cite web|last1=Berman|first1=Richard|title=Union ‘comeback’'comeback' a wishful myth|url=http://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/guest-columnists/2015/02/11/union-comeback-wishful-myth/23174817/|website=www.ShrevePortTimes.com|publisher=The Times|date=2015}}</ref>

The [[''Chicago Tribune]]'' ran a story on the Ten Worst Teachers campaign, in which it quoted Berman as saying he wanted to “jump-start a conversation” about the fact that many children “can't read or do math and are well behind in science” and that many teachers “say their colleagues are not competent to teach kids,” the teachers' unions responded by calling him “a paid attack dog who won't disclose the sources of funding for his work.” Chuck Porcari of the American Federation of Teachers said: “[Berman] tries to make a splash, then disappears into the ether until someone writes him a check....Teachers and the public deserve to know who's bankrolling this effort. Who's paying to attack teachers?”<ref>{{cite web|last1=Masterson|first1=Kathryn|title=Worst teachers promised $10,000 by lobbyist|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2008-03-31/news/0803300194_1_bad-teachers-teachers-unions-center-for-union-facts|websitearchive-url=ChicagoTribunehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110813050048/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2008-03-31/news/0803300194_1_bad-teachers-teachers-unions-center-for-union-facts|publisherurl-status=dead|archive-date=August 13, 2011|work=Chicago Tribune|date=2008}}</ref> Similarly, AFT president Randi Weingarten, in response to CUF's above-cited criticism of her in 2014, said Berman “won’t disclose who is funding his efforts.”<ref name="The Washington Post"/>

After the CUF ran an ad during the 2012 [[Super Bowl]] in which it was stated that "Only ten percent of people in unions today actually voted to join the union," Glenn Kessler, author of the “Fact Checker” column in the''The Washington Post'', called this a “nonsense fact," given that most employees of unionized companies joined those firms after the firms were unionized and have never had a chance to vote on that status.<ref>{{cite news |work=The Washington Post |date=February 7, 2012 |title=A nonsense fact in a Super Bowl ad |author=Glenn Kessler |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/a-nonsense-fact-in-a-super-bowl-ad/2012/02/06/gIQAJypDvQ_blog.html?wprss=fact-checker&google_editors_picks=true}}</ref> Mark Hemingway of the conservative ''[[The Weekly Standard|Weekly Standard]]'' rejected this view, noting Kessler's acknowledgment that CUF's charge “may be technically correct." <ref>{{cite web|last1=Hemingway|first1=Mark|title=Fact Checking Failure in Five Easy Steps|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/yet-another-fact-checking-failure_626429.html|websitearchive-url=WeeklyStandardhttps://web.archive.org/web/20120209054824/http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/yet-another-fact-checking-failure_626429.html|publisherurl-status=dead|archive-date=February 9, 2012|work=The Weekly Standard|date=2012}}</ref>

In 2006, Berman said that he had raised about $2.5 million "from companies, trade organizations and individuals", whom he declined to identify.<ref name=SeattlePI>{{cite web | date=14 February 2006 |title=New group launches anti-union drive |series=Business |last=Chapman |first=Kim |workagency=[[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg News]] | url=http://www.seattlepi.com/business/259366_antiunion14.html |accessdateaccess-date=21 December 2008 |website=seattlepi.com}}</ref>

Sarah Longwell, a CUF spokeswoman, said that "The reason we don't disclose supporters is because unions have a long history of targeting anyone who opposes them, whether it be in a threatening way or by lodging campaigns against them." Longwell is also associated with the PETA Kills Animals campaign, is listed as director of communications for the Center for Consumer Freedom,<ref name="NYpost-22Oct06">{{cite web|last=Longwell |first=Sarah |title=Nervous-Nelly Nation |work=[[The New York Post]] |date=22 October 2006 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/10222006/postopinion/opedcolumnists/nervous_nelly_nation_opedcolumnists_sarah_longwell.htm?page=0 |format=Opinion |accessdateaccess-date=22 December 2008 }}{{dead link|date=April 2017|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> Managing Director of the [[American Beverage Institute]],<ref name="youtube">{{cite video |people=Sarah Longwell |title=Sarah Longwell on Sobriety Checkpoints |medium=[[Fox News]] |publisher=[[YouTube]] |location= |date=2008}}</ref> and a spokeswoman for the Indoor Tanning Association,<ref>[http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/ny-liskin0712,0,6236455.story Increase in melanoma skin cancer blamed on tanning]</ref> all run by Berman & Co.

Retailer [[Wal-Mart]] has denied funding the group, but has said that it has a relationship in which it exchanges union information with Berman.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?s_site=freep&f_site=freep&f_sitename=Detroit+Free+Press&p_theme=gannett&p_product=FP&p_action=search&p_field_base-0=&p_text_base-0=%22Antiunion+ad+campaign+in+Detroit%27s+face+today%22&Search=Search&p_perpage=10&p_maxdocs=200&p_queryname=700&s_search_type=keyword&p_sort=_rank_%3AD&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date%3AB%2CE&p_text_date-0= |last=Stringer |first=Kortney |title=Antiunion ad campaign in Detroit's face today |publisherwork=[[Detroit Free Press]] |date=24 May 2006 |format=Article archive}}</ref>

[[Charity Navigator]] has voiced concern about the substantial share of CUF expenses that go to Berman and Company, Richard Berman's PR firm.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=13374|title=Charity Navigator - CN Advisory of Center for Union Facts|website=Charity Navigator|language=en|access-date=2017-05-18}}</ref> Charity Navigator stated that it finds "the practice of a charity contracting for management services with a business owned by that charity's CEO atypical" and noted that the practice continued in fiscal years 2011 through 2014.<ref name=":1" />

* Amy Joyce, "Full-Page Ads Launch Anti-Union Drive - Lobbyist Aims to Show Labor Groups to be 'Duplicitous'", ''The Washington Post'', February 14, 2006.

* Steven Greenhouse, "Group Starts Anti-Union Campaign", ''The New York Times'', February 14, 2006.

* Kris Maher, [https://www.wsj.com/public/article/SB113803860071853820-VdTeMQG0x5M_9SOFLy455VbL0xk_20070214.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top "Taking on the AFL-CIO"], ''The Wall Street Journal'', February 13, 2006.