Content deleted Content added
→In rural areas: neutral summary |
→Gallic monasticism: Removed speculatory info |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Copy edit|for=style and neutrality|date=October 2023}}
{{Original research|date=July 2024}}
By the middle of the 3rd century, there were several churches organized in [[Roman Gaul]], and soon after the cessation of persecution, the bishops of the Latin world assembled at Arles in AD 314.
The Church of Gaul passed through three crises in the late Roman period, [[Arianism]], [[Priscillianism]] and [[Pelagianism]].
Line 19:
===Local legends===
Such claims were flattering to local vanity. During the [[Middle Ages]] and over the centuries many legends grew up in support of them. The [[evangelization]] of Gaul has often been attributed to missionaries sent from Rome by [[Pope Clement I|St. Clement]]. This theory inspired a whole series of fallacious narratives and forgeries that complicate and obscure the historical record.<ref name=Lejay/>
===Gregory of Tours===
[[File:Grégoire de Tours, Histoire des Francs, livres 1 à 6, page de frontispice.jpg|thumb|left|Frontispiece of the {{lang|la|Historia Francorum}}, in which Gregory of Tours gives an account of the evangelisation of Gaul]]
* [[Gatianus]] founded the [[Diocese of Tours]]
Line 34 ⟶ 36:
* [[Saint Martial|Martialis]] founded the [[Diocese of Limoges]]
The 1913 [[Catholic Encyclopedia]] considers Gregory's account more credible than the local legends, but maintains some reservations, assessing the narrative overall as tradition rather than fact. The encyclopedia notes that Gregory was writing three hundred years after the purported events, and highlights chronological issues with his account.
==Spread of Christianity==
Line 79 ⟶ 81:
=== In rural areas ===
[[File:Högling Deckenfresko.JPG|thumb|left|Martin of Tours, depicted felling a sacred tree]]
Rural areas in Gaul remained strongholds of [[Ancient Celtic religion|traditional Gallic]] and [[Religion in ancient Rome|ancient Roman]] religions, and [[Gallo-Roman religion|syncretic fusions]] of the two.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://history-world.org/celts%20religious_beliefs_and_practices_.htm |title=The religious beliefs and practices of the ancient Celts |access-date=2015-12-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151030061853/http://history-world.org/celts%20religious_beliefs_and_practices_.htm |archive-date=2015-10-30 |url-status=usurped }}</ref> Missionaries such as [[Martin of Tours]], [[Victricius of Rouen]], and {{ill|Martin of Brives|fr|Martin de Brive}} worked to stamp out these practices, especially in central Gaul. A famous legend tells of Martin of Tours felling a sacred tree near Autun and being attacked by a peasant. The efforts of these missionaries were largely unsuccessful, and a quote from 395 refers to the Christian deity as "that God Who alone is worshipped in the large cities".<ref>[[Alexander Riese]], {{lang|la|[[Anthologia Latina]]}}, no. 893, v. 105</ref>
==Gallic monasticism==
The Christianization of the lower classes of the people was greatly aided by the newly established monasteries. In Gaul as elsewhere the first Christian ascetics lived in the world and kept their personal freedom. The practice of religious life in common was introduced by Saint Martin (died c. 397) and Cassian (died c. 435). Martin established [[Marmoutier Abbey, Tours|Marmoutier Abbey]] near Tours, where in the beginning the monks lived in separate grottoes or wooden huts. A little later Cassian founded two monasteries at Marseilles (415). He had previously visited the monks of the East, and especially Egypt, and had brought back their methods, which he adapted to the circumstances of Gallo-Roman life. Through two of his works,
[[File:Abbaye st honorat de lerins - 003.jpg|thumb|right|Lérins Abbey]]
Line 101 ⟶ 104:
* [[Monastery of Grigny|Grigny]] near [[Vienne, Isère|Vienne]]
* [[Île Barbe]] at [[Lyon]]
* [[Moutiers-Saint-Jean Abbey|Réomé]]
* Morvan
* [[Condat Abbey|Saint-Claude]] in the [[Jura Mountains]]
* {{ill|Collégiale Saint-Mexme de Chinon|fr}}
* [[Loches ]]
==Theological strife==
Line 116 ⟶ 119:
===Priscillianism===
Priscillianism had a greater hold on the masses of the faithful. It was above all a method, an ideal of Christian life, which appealed to all, even to women. It was condemned in 380 at the [[Synod of Saragossa]] where the Bishops of Bordeaux and Agen were present; nonetheless it spread rapidly in Central Gaul, Eauze in particular being a stronghold. When in 385
===Pelagianism=== Finally the bishops and monks of Gaul were long divided over Pelagianism. [[Proculus, Bishop of Marseille]], had obliged Leporius, a disciple of Pelagius, to leave Gaul, but it was not long before Marseille and Lérins, led by Cassian, Vincent and Faustus, became hotbeds of a teaching opposed to St. Augustine's and known as [[Semipelagianism]]. [[Prosper of Aquitaine]] wrote against it, and was obliged to take refuge at Rome. It was not until the beginning of the 6th century that the teaching of Augustine triumphed, when a monk of Lérins, [[Caesarius of Arles]], a follower of Augustine, caused it to be adopted by the 529 [[Council of Orange (529)|Council of Orange]]. In the final struggle Rome intervened. We do not know much concerning the earlier relations between the bishops of Gaul and the pope. The position of Irenaeus in the Easter Controversy shows a considerable degree of independence; yet Irenaeus proclaimed the primacy of the See of Rome, which he based on the Apostolic Succession and, equally importantly, right teaching, orthodoxy (whereas the Gnostics whom he opposed were mere itinerant preachers without authority). About the middle of the 3rd century the pope was appealed to for the purpose of settling difficulties in the Church of Gaul and to remove an erring bishop (Cyprian, Epist. lxviii). At the Council of Arles (314) the bishops of Gaul were present with those of Brittany, Spain, Africa, even Italy; Pope Sylvester sent delegates to represent him. It was in a way a Council of the West. During all that century, however, the episcopate of Gaul had no head, and the bishops grouped themselves according to the ties of friendship or locality. Metropolitans did not exist as yet, and when advice was needed Milan was consulted. "The traditional authority", says Duchesne, "in all matters of discipline remained always the ancient Church of Rome; in practice, however, the Council of Milan decided in case of conflict." The popes then took the situation in hand, and in 417 Pope Zosimus made Patrocles, Bishop of Arles, his vicar or delegate in Gaul, and provided that all disputes should be referred to him. Moreover, no Gallic ecclesiastic could have access to the pope without testimonial letters from the Bishop of Aries. This primacy of Aries waxed and waned under the succeeding popes. It enjoyed a final period of brilliancy, under Caesarius, but after his time it conferred on the occupant merely an honorary title. In consequence, however, of the extensive authority of Arles in the 5th and 6th centuries, canonical discipline was more rapidly developed there, and the "Libri canonum" that were soon in vogue in Southern Gaul were modelled on those of the Church of Aries. Towards the end of this period Caesarius assisted at a series of councils, thus obtaining a certain recognition as legislator for the Merovingian Church.
Line 140 ⟶ 145:
They also indicate a growing congruence between church and state. While Arian rulers kept their distance from the general councils, Visigoth rulers began influencing the councils only after the conversion of [[Reccared I]]. As soon as they had established themselves, Merovingian kings (and the Carolingians after them) exerted their influence on the councils.<ref>Rahner, Karl (1975). Encyclopedia of theology: a concise Sacramentum mundi, 301f.</ref> According to Gregory Halfond, such congruence was a particular quality of the Gallo-Roman church, in which the Roman aristocracy made up an important part of the leadership of the Gallo-Roman (and later the Frankish) church; continuity in this power nexus is indicated also by the continued use of Roman procedures in the councils.<ref>Halfond, Gregory I. (2009). ''Archaeology of Frankish Church Councils, AD 511-768'', pp. 4-6.</ref>
An early important churchman is [[Caesarius of Arles]], who organized regional synods, which were mostly concerned with conforming the canons and practices of the Church of Gaul to those of other Churches. At Orange, for instance, he had earlier ([[Pelagianism|Pelagian]]) practices of the Gallic church anathematized, and at the ensuing [[Council of Vaison|council in Vaison]] liturgical conformity with other Churches (Italy, Africa, the East) was established.<ref name=markus155>Markus 155-56.{{Full citation needed|date=August 2016}}</ref>
A model for the following Frankish synods was set by [[Clovis I]], who organized the [[First Council of Orléans]] (511); though he did not himself attend it, he set the agenda and followed the proceedings closely (at stake was "the unification of the Roman church under Frankish rule").<ref>Halfond, Gregory I. (2009). ''Archaeology of Frankish Church Councils, AD 511-768'', pp. 8f.</ref> After the waning of Caesarius's influence and the establishment of Merovingian rule, the focus of the soon-to-be Frankish Church shifted north, to deal with the growing problem of adjusting to "deeply embedded Germanic practices"; rather than Pelagianism or Predestinatarianism, bishops now had to deal with problems involving "marriage, the relations between a warrior aristocracy and clergy, or monks and nuns, the conflicts born of royal influence and control, or of property rights".<ref name=markus155/>
By the eighth century, the regular organization of synods had largely disappeared, and when Boniface complained to [[Pope Zacharias]] in 742 that there hadn't been a synod in the Frankish church in at least eighty years, he was not exaggerating by much.<ref>Hartmann 59.</ref><ref>Schuler, Matthias (1947). "Zum 1200jähr. Jubiläum des fränkischen Generalkonzils vom Jahre 747. Der Höhepunkt der Reformtätigkeit des hl. Bonifatius". ''Trierer Theologische Zeitschrift'' 56: 362–70.</ref>
|