Content deleted Content added
I'm not sure these are a good fit here. Maybe the 0<z<20 lookback time plot could be paired with a revised and easier to read version of the existing proper distance plot a bit further down? The math isn't really needed here, either. |
m Open access bot: pmc updated in citation with #oabot. |
||
(46 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|Change of wavelength in photons during travel}}
{{About|the astronomical phenomenon||}}
[[File:Redshift.svg|thumb|upright|[[Spectral line|Absorption lines]] in the [[visible spectrum]] of a [[supercluster]] of distant galaxies (right), as compared to absorption lines in the visible spectrum of the [[Sun]] (left). Arrows indicate redshift. Wavelength increases up towards the red and beyond (frequency decreases).]]
{{General relativity sidebar}}
{{Physical cosmology}}
{{Special relativity sidebar}}
In [[physics]], a '''redshift''' is an increase in the [[wavelength]], and corresponding decrease in the [[frequency]] and [[photon energy]], of [[electromagnetic radiation]] (such as [[light]]). The opposite change, a decrease in wavelength and
All redshifts can be understood under the umbrella of [[Frame of reference|frame transformation laws]]. [[Gravitational wave]]s, which also travel at [[Speed of light|the speed of light]], are subject to the same redshift phenomena.<ref>{{cite journal | title=Detectability of primordial black hole binaries at high redshift | last=Ding | first=Qianhang | journal=Physical Review D | volume=104 | issue=4 | at=id. 043527 | date=August 2021 | doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.104.043527 | arxiv=2011.13643 | bibcode=2021PhRvD.104d3527D }}</ref> The value of a redshift is often denoted by the letter {{math|''z''}}, corresponding to the fractional change in wavelength (positive for redshifts, negative for blueshifts), and by the wavelength ratio {{math|1 + ''z''}} (which is greater than 1 for redshifts and less than 1 for blueshifts).
Examples of strong redshifting are a [[gamma ray]] perceived as an [[X-ray]], or initially visible light perceived as [[radio wave]]s. Subtler redshifts are seen in the [[astronomical spectroscopy|spectroscopic]] observations of [[astronomical]] objects, and are used in terrestrial technologies such as [[Doppler radar]] and [[radar gun]]s.
Line 17 ⟶ 14:
==History==
The history of the subject began
{{cite book
|last=Doppler | first=Christian
Line 25 ⟶ 22:
|bibcode=1846befi.book.....D
|volume=69
}}</ref>
{{cite book
|last=Maulik | first=Dev
Line 37 ⟶ 34:
|isbn=978-3-540-23088-5
|publisher=Springer
}}</ref> Doppler correctly predicted that the phenomenon
{{cite web
|last1=O'Connor | first1=John J.
Line 46 ⟶ 43:
|work=[[MacTutor History of Mathematics archive]]
|publisher=[[University of St Andrews]]
}}</ref> Before this was verified
The
{{cite journal
|last=Huggins | first=William
Line 57 ⟶ 54:
|bibcode=1868RSPT..158..529H
|doi=10.1098/rstl.1868.0022
}}</ref> In 1871, optical redshift was confirmed when the phenomenon was observed in [[Fraunhofer lines]], using solar rotation, about 0.1 Å in the red.<ref>
{{cite journal
|last=Reber | first=G.
Line 68 ⟶ 65:
|bibcode=1995Ap&SS.227...93R
|s2cid=30000639
}}</ref> In 1887, Vogel and Scheiner discovered the
{{cite journal
|last=Bélopolsky | first=A.
Line 80 ⟶ 77:
}}</ref>
[[Arthur Eddington]] used the term
{{cite journal
|last=de Sitter | first=W.
Line 91 ⟶ 88:
}}</ref>
Beginning with observations in 1912, [[Vesto Slipher]] discovered that most [[
{{cite journal
|last=Slipher | first=Vesto
Line 108 ⟶ 105:
|volume=23 |pages=21–24 |date=1915
|bibcode=1915PA.....23...21S
}}</ref> In it he
{{cite journal |last=Slipher | first=Vesto |date=1915 |title=Spectrographic Observations of Nebulae |journal=[[Popular Astronomy (US magazine)|Popular Astronomy]] |volume=23 |page=22 |bibcode=1915PA.....23...21S}}</ref>
Slipher reported the velocities for 15 spiral nebulae spread across the entire [[celestial sphere]], all but three having observable "positive" (that is recessional) velocities. Subsequently, [[Edwin Hubble]] discovered an approximate relationship between the redshifts of such "nebulae", and the [[distance]]s to them, with the formulation of his eponymous [[Hubble's law]].<ref> {{cite journal
|doi=10.1073/pnas.15.3.168
Line 121 ⟶ 120:
|pmc=522427
|doi-access=free
}}</ref> [[Milton Humason]] worked on
|last=Friedman |first=A. A.
|date=1922
Line 130 ⟶ 129:
|doi=10.1007/BF01332580
|bibcode = 1922ZPhy...10..377F |s2cid=125190902
}} English translation in {{cite journal |title=On the Curvature of Space|doi=10.1023/A:1026751225741 |last=Friedman |first=A. |date=1999 |journal=[[General Relativity and Gravitation]] |volume=31 |issue=12 |pages=1991–2000 |bibcode=1999GReGr..31.1991F|s2cid=122950995 }})</ref>
|last=Eddington |first=Arthur | author-link=Arthur Eddington
|date=1933
Line 139 ⟶ 138:
==Measurement, characterization, and interpretation==
[[File:High-redshift galaxy candidates in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field 2012.jpg|thumb|High-redshift galaxy candidates in the [[Hubble Ultra Deep Field]], 2012<ref>{{cite news|title=Hubble census finds galaxies at redshifts 9 to 12|url=https://esahubble.org/news/heic1219/|access-date=13 December 2012|newspaper=ESA/Hubble Press Release}}</ref> ]]
The [[visible spectrum|spectrum]] of light that comes from a source (see idealized spectrum illustration top-right) can be measured. To determine the redshift, one searches for features in the spectrum such as [[spectral line|absorption lines]], [[spectral line|emission lines]], or other variations in light intensity<!--Don't link to disambiguation page-->. If found, these features can be compared with known features in the spectrum of various chemical compounds found in experiments where that compound is located on Earth. A very common [[chemical element|atomic element]] in space is [[hydrogen]].
Determining the redshift of an object in this way requires a frequency or wavelength range. In order to calculate the redshift, one has to know the wavelength of the emitted light in the rest frame of the source: in other words, the wavelength that would be measured by an observer located adjacent to and comoving with the source. Since in astronomical applications this measurement cannot be done directly, because that would require traveling to the distant star of interest, the method using spectral lines described here is used instead. Redshifts cannot be calculated by looking at unidentified features whose rest-frame frequency is unknown, or with a spectrum that is featureless or [[white noise]] (random fluctuations in a spectrum).<ref>See, for example, this 25 May 2004 [http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/swift/about_swift/redshift.html press release] from [[NASA]]'s [[Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission|Swift]] [[space telescope]] that is researching [[gamma-ray burst]]s: "Measurements of the gamma-ray spectra obtained during the main outburst of the GRB have found little value as redshift indicators, due to the lack of well-defined features. However, optical observations of GRB afterglows have produced spectra with identifiable lines, leading to precise redshift measurements."</ref>
Line 253 ⟶ 254:
This [[cosmological redshift]] is commonly attributed to stretching of the wavelengths of photons propagating through the expanding space. This interpretation can be misleading, however; expanding space is only a choice of [[coordinate conditions|coordinates]] and thus cannot have physical consequences. The cosmological redshift is more naturally interpreted as a Doppler shift arising due to the recession of distant objects.<ref name="Hogg">{{cite journal |author=Bunn |first1=E. F. |last2=Hogg |first2=D. W. |year=2009 |title=The kinematic origin of the cosmological redshift |journal=American Journal of Physics |volume=77 |issue=8 |pages=688–694 |arxiv=0808.1081 |bibcode=2009AmJPh..77..688B |doi=10.1119/1.3129103 |s2cid=1365918}}</ref>
The observational consequences of this effect can be derived using [[Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric|the equations]] from [[general relativity]] that describe a [[cosmological principle|homogeneous and isotropic universe]]. The cosmological redshift can thus be written as a function of {{math|''a''}}, the time-dependent cosmic [[Scale factor (cosmology)|scale factor]]:▼
▲The observational consequences of this effect can be derived using [[Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric|the equations]] from [[general relativity]] that describe a [[cosmological principle|homogeneous and isotropic universe]].
:<math>1+z = \frac{a_\mathrm{now}}{a_\mathrm{then}}</math>
Using a model of the expansion of the universe, redshift can be related to the age of an observed object, the so-called ''[[cosmic time]]–redshift relation''. Denote a density ratio as {{math|Ω<sub>0</sub>}}:
Line 338 ⟶ 266:
with {{math|''ρ''<sub>crit</sub>}} the critical density demarcating a universe that eventually crunches from one that simply expands. This density is about three hydrogen atoms per cubic meter of space.<ref Name=Weinberg>{{cite book |first=Steven | last=Weinberg |edition=2nd |title=The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe | page=34 |isbn=9780-465-02437-7 |date=1993 |publisher=Basic Books|title-link=The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe }}</ref> At large redshifts, {{math| ''1 + z'' > Ω<sub>0</sub><sup>−1</sup>}}, one finds:
:<math> t(z) \approx \frac {2}{3 H_0 {\Omega_0}^{1/2}
where {{math|''H''<sub>0</sub>}} is the present-day [[Hubble constant]], and {{math|''z''}} is the redshift.<ref name="Bergström">{{cite book |title=Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CQYu_sutWAoC&pg=PA77 |page=77, Eq.4.79 |isbn=978-3-540-32924-4 |publisher=Springer |edition=2nd|date=2006|first1 = Lars |last1=Bergström|first2 = Ariel |last2=Goobar|author-link1=Lars Bergström (physicist) |author-link2=Ariel Goobar }}</ref><ref name = Longair>{{cite book |title=Galaxy Formation |first=M. S. |last=Longair |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2ARuLT-tk5EC&pg=PA161 |page=161 |isbn=978-3-540-63785-1 |publisher=Springer |date=1998
There are several websites for calculating
====Distinguishing between cosmological and local effects====
Line 357 ⟶ 285:
| doi=10.1051/0004-6361:20021566 | bibcode=2003A&A...398..479K
| s2cid=26822121 | arxiv=astro-ph/0211011
}}</ref> The resulting situation can be illustrated by the [[Expansion of the universe#Other conceptual models of expansion|Expanding Rubber Sheet Universe]], a common cosmological analogy used to describe the expansion of space. If two objects are represented by ball bearings and spacetime by a stretching rubber sheet, the Doppler effect is caused by rolling the balls across the sheet to create peculiar motion. The cosmological redshift occurs when the ball bearings are stuck to the sheet and the sheet is stretched.<ref name=Kuhn>{{cite book |title=In Quest of the Universe | first1=Theo | last1=Koupelis | first2=Karl F. | last2=Kuhn |edition=5th |url=https://archive.org/details/inquestofunivers00koup |url-access=registration |page=[https://archive.org/details/inquestofunivers00koup/page/557 557] |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Publishers |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-7637-4387-1}}</ref><ref name=Lewis>{{cite journal | quote=It is perfectly valid to interpret the equations of relativity in terms of an expanding space. The mistake is to push analogies too far and imbue space with physical properties that are not consistent with the equations of relativity. |title=Cosmological Radar Ranging in an Expanding Universe |arxiv=0805.2197 |journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]] | first1=Geraint F. | last1=Lewis |date=2008 |pages=960–964 |issue=3 |volume=388 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13477.x |bibcode=2008MNRAS.388..960L|display-authors=4|last2=Francis |first2=Matthew J. |last3=Barnes |first3=Luke A. |last4=Kwan |first4=Juliana |last5=James |first5=J. Berian |doi-access=free |s2cid=15147382 }}</ref><ref name=Chodorowski>{{Cite journal | first=Michal | last=Chodorowski |title=Is space really expanding? A counterexample |date=2007 |arxiv=astro-ph/0601171 |journal=Concepts Phys |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=17–34|bibcode = 2007ONCP....4...15C |doi = 10.2478/v10005-007-0002-2 |s2cid=15931627 }}</ref>
The redshifts of galaxies include both a component related to [[recessional velocity]] from expansion of the universe, and a component related to [[peculiar motion]] (Doppler shift).<ref>{{cite journal
Line 367 ⟶ 295:
| url=http://www.df.uba.ar/users/sgil/physics_paper_doc/papers_phys/cosmo/doppler_redshift.pdf
| access-date=2023-03-16
}}</ref> The redshift due to expansion of the universe depends upon the recessional velocity in a fashion determined by the cosmological model chosen to describe the expansion of the universe, which is very different from how Doppler redshift depends upon local velocity.<ref name="Harrison2">{{cite journal |last=Harrison |first=Edward |date=1992 |title=The redshift-distance and velocity-distance laws |journal=Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 |volume=403 |pages=28–31 |bibcode=1993ApJ...403...28H |doi=10.1086/172179 |doi-access=free
If the universe were contracting instead of expanding, we would see distant galaxies blueshifted by an amount proportional to their distance instead of redshifted.<ref>This is only true in a universe where there are no [[peculiar velocity|peculiar velocities]]. Otherwise, redshifts combine as
Line 397 ⟶ 325:
==Observations in astronomy==
[[File:Look-back time by redshift.png|thumb|The [[lookback time]] of extragalactic observations by their redshift up to z=20.<ref name="Pilipenko">S.V. Pilipenko (2013-2021) [https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5961 "Paper-and-pencil cosmological calculator"] arxiv:1303.5961, including [https://code.google.com/archive/p/cosmonom/downloads Fortran-90 code] upon which the citing charts and formulae are based.</ref> There are websites for calculating many such physical measures from redshift.<ref name="UCLA-2015"/><ref name="UCLA-2018"/><ref name="ICRAR-2022"/><ref name="KEMP-2022"/>]]
The redshift observed in astronomy can be measured because the [[emission spectrum|emission]] and [[Absorption spectroscopy|absorption]] spectra for [[atom]]s are distinctive and well known, calibrated from [[spectroscopic]] experiments in [[laboratories]] on Earth. When the redshift of various absorption and emission lines from a single astronomical object is measured, {{math|''z''}} is found to be remarkably constant. Although distant objects may be slightly blurred and lines broadened, it is by no more than can be explained by [[Kinetic theory of gases|thermal]] or mechanical [[motion]] of the source. For these reasons and others, the consensus among astronomers is that the redshifts they observe are due to some combination of the three established forms of Doppler-like redshifts. Alternative hypotheses and explanations for redshift such as [[tired light]] are not generally considered plausible.<ref name=reboul>When cosmological redshifts were first discovered, [[Fritz Zwicky]] proposed an effect known as tired light. While usually considered for historical interests, it is sometimes, along with [[intrinsic redshift]] suggestions, utilized by [[nonstandard cosmologies]]. In 1981, H. J. Reboul summarised many [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1981A%26AS...45..129R&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=42ca922c9c23806 alternative redshift mechanisms] that had been discussed in the literature since the 1930s. In 2001, [[Geoffrey Burbidge]] remarked in a [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2001PASP..113..899B&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML review] that the wider astronomical community has marginalized such discussions since the 1960s. Burbidge and [[Halton Arp]], while investigating the mystery of [[Quasar#History of quasar observation|the nature of quasars]], tried to develop alternative redshift mechanisms, and very few of their fellow scientists acknowledged let alone accepted their work. Moreover, {{cite journal | title=Timescale Stretch Parameterization of Type Ia Supernova B-Band Lightcurves | first1=G. | last1=Goldhaber | first2=D. E. | last2=Groom | first3=A. | last3=Kim | first4=G. | last4=Aldering | first5=P. | last5=Astier | first6=A. | last6=Conley | first7=S. E. | last7=Deustua | first8=R. | last8=Ellis | first9=S. | last9=Fabbro | first10=A. S. | last10=Fruchter | first11=A. | last11=Goobar | first12=I. | last12=Hook | first13=M. | last13=Irwin | first14=M. | last14=Kim | first15=R. A. | last15=Knop | first16=C. | last16=Lidman | first17=R. | last17=McMahon | first18=P. E. | last18=Nugent | first19=R. | last19=Pain | first20=N. | last20=Panagia | first21=C. R. | last21=Pennypacker | first22=S. | last22=Perlmutter | first23=P. | last23=Ruiz-Lapuente | first24=B. | last24=Schaefe | first25=N. A. | last25=Walton | first26=T. | last26=York | display-authors=1 | year=2001 | journal=Astrophysical Journal | volume=558 | issue=1 | pages=359–386 | doi=10.1086/322460 | arxiv=astro-ph/0104382 | bibcode=2001ApJ...558..359G | s2cid=17237531| doi-access=free }} pointed out that alternative theories are unable to account for timescale stretch observed in [[type Ia supernovae]]</ref>
Spectroscopy, as a measurement, is considerably more difficult than simple [[photometry (astronomy)|photometry]], which measures the [[brightness]] of astronomical objects through certain [[Optical filter|filters]].<ref>For a review of the subject of photometry, consider: {{cite book | last=Budding | first=E. | title=Introduction to Astronomical Photometry | publisher=Cambridge University Press | date=September 24, 1993 | isbn=0-521-41867-4 }}</ref> When photometric data is all that is available (for example, the [[Hubble Deep Field]] and the [[Hubble Ultra Deep Field]]), astronomers rely on a technique for measuring [[photometric redshift]]s.<ref>The technique was first described by: {{cite conference | last=Baum | first=W. A. | year=1962 | editor-first=G. C. | editor-last=McVittie | title=Problems of extra-galactic research | page=390 | conference=IAU Symposium No. 15 }}</ref> Due to the broad wavelength ranges in photometric filters and the necessary assumptions about the nature of the spectrum at the light-source, [[observational error|errors]] for these sorts of measurements can range up to {{math|δ''z'' {{=}} 0.5}}, and are much less reliable than spectroscopic determinations.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Bolzonella | first1=M. | last2=Miralles | first2=J.-M. | last3=Pelló | first3=R. | title=Photometric redshifts based on standard SED fitting procedures | journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics | volume=363 | pages=476–492 | year=2000 | arxiv=astro-ph/0003380 | bibcode=2000A&A...363..476B }}</ref>
However, photometry does at least allow a qualitative characterization of a redshift. For example, if a Sun-like spectrum had a redshift of {{math|''z'' {{=}} 1}}, it would be brightest in the [[infrared]](1000nm) rather than at the blue-green(500nm) color associated with the peak of its [[Black body|blackbody]] spectrum, and the light intensity will be reduced in the filter by a factor of four, {{math|(1 + ''z''){{sup|2}}}}. Both the photon count rate and the photon energy are redshifted. (See [[K correction]] for more details on the photometric consequences of redshift.)<ref>A pedagogical overview of the K-correction by David Hogg and other members of the [[Sloan Digital Sky Survey|SDSS]] collaboration can be found at: {{cite arXiv | title=The K correction | last1=Hogg | first1=David W. | last2=Baldry | first2=Ivan K. | last3=Blanton | first3=Michael R. | last4=Eisenstein | first4=Daniel J. | display-authors=1 | date=October 2002 | eprint=astro-ph/0210394}}</ref> ===Local observations===
In nearby objects (within our [[Milky Way]] galaxy) observed redshifts are almost always related to the [[Line-of-sight propagation|line-of-sight]] velocities associated with the objects being observed. Observations of such redshifts and blueshifts have enabled astronomers to measure [[velocity|velocities]] and parametrize the [[mass]]es of the [[orbit]]ing [[star]]s in [[spectroscopic binaries]], a method first employed in 1868 by British astronomer [[William Huggins]].<ref name=Huggins/> Similarly, small redshifts and blueshifts detected in the spectroscopic measurements of individual stars are one way astronomers have been able to [[Methods of detecting exoplanets#Radial velocity|diagnose and measure]] the presence and characteristics of [[Exoplanet|planetary systems]] around other stars and have even made very [[Rossiter–McLaughlin effect|detailed differential measurements]] of redshifts during [[Methods of detecting exoplanets|planetary transits]] to determine precise orbital parameters.<ref>The [[Exoplanet Tracker]] is the newest observing project to use this technique, able to track the redshift variations in multiple objects at once, as reported in {{cite journal |last1=Ge |first1=Jian |last2=Van Eyken |first2=Julian |last3=Mahadevan |first3=Suvrath |author3-link=Suvrath Mahadevan |last4=Dewitt |first4=Curtis |last5=Kane |first5=Stephen R. |last6=Cohen |first6=Roger |last7=Vanden Heuvel |first7=Andrew |last8=Fleming |first8=Scott W. |last9=Guo |first9=Pengcheng |last10=Henry |first10=Gregory W. |last11=Schneider |first11=Donald P. |last12=Ramsey |first12=Lawrence W. |last13=Wittenmyer |first13=Robert A. |last14=Endl |first14=Michael |last15=Cochran |first15=William D. |display-authors=4 |date=2006 |title=The First Extrasolar Planet Discovered with a
Finely detailed measurements of redshifts are used in [[helioseismology]] to determine the precise movements of the [[photosphere]] of the [[Sun]].<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1007/BF00243557 | title = Solar and stellar seismology | date = 1988 | last1 = Libbrecht | first1 = Keng | journal = Space Science Reviews | volume = 47 | issue = 3–4 |bibcode=1988SSRv...47..275L | pages=275–301| s2cid = 120897051 | url = https://authors.library.caltech.edu/104214/1/1988SSRv___47__275L.pdf }}</ref> Redshifts have also been used to make the first measurements of the [[rotation]] rates of [[planet]]s,<ref>In 1871 [[Hermann Carl Vogel]] measured the rotation rate of [[Venus]]. [[Vesto Slipher]] was working on such measurements when he turned his attention to spiral nebulae.</ref> velocities of [[interstellar cloud]]s,<ref>An early review by [[Jan Hendrik Oort|Oort, J. H.]] on the subject: {{cite journal | title=The formation of galaxies and the origin of the high-velocity hydrogen | journal=[[Astronomy and Astrophysics]] | volume=7 | page=381 | date=1970 | bibcode=1970A&A.....7..381O | last= Oort | first= J. H. }}</ref> the [[Galaxy rotation curve|rotation of galaxies]],<ref name="basicastronomy" /> and the [[dynamics (mechanics)|dynamics]] of [[Accretion disk|accretion]] onto [[neutron star]]s and [[black hole]]s which exhibit both Doppler and gravitational redshifts.<ref>{{cite journal| last=Asaoka | first=Ikuko | bibcode=1989PASJ...41..763A | title=X-ray spectra at infinity from a relativistic accretion disk around a Kerr black hole | journal=Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan | volume=41 | issue=4 | date=1989 | pages=763–778 }}</ref> ===Extragalactic observations===
[[File:Age by redshift.png|thumb|The age of the universe versus redshift from z=5 to 20.<ref name="Pilipenko" />]]
The most distant objects exhibit larger redshifts corresponding to the [[Hubble flow]] of the [[universe]]. The largest-observed redshift, corresponding to the greatest distance and furthest back in time, is that of the [[cosmic microwave background]] radiation; the [[Hubble's law#Redshift velocity|numerical value of its redshift]] is about {{math|''z'' {{=}} 1089}} ({{math|''z'' {{=}} 0}} corresponds to present time), and it shows the state of the universe about 13.8 billion years ago,<ref>{{cite web
| title=Cosmic Detectives
Line 411 ⟶ 347:
| date=2013-04-02
| access-date=2013-04-25
}}</ref> and 379,000 years after the initial moments of the [[Big Bang]].<ref>An accurate measurement of the cosmic microwave background was achieved by the [[Cosmic Background Explorer|COBE]] experiment. The final published temperature of 2.73 K was reported in this paper: {{cite journal | last1=Fixsen | first1=D. J. | last2=Cheng | first2=E. S. | last3=Cottingham | first3=D. A. | last4=Eplee | first4=R. E. Jr. | last5=Isaacman | first5=R. B. | last6=Mather | first6=J. C. | last7=Meyer | first7=S. S. | last8=Noerdlinger | first8=P. D. | last9=Shafer | first9=R. A. | last10=Weiss | first10=R. | last11=Wright | first11=E. L. | last12=Bennett | first12=C. L. | last13=Boggess | first13=N. W. | author-link13 = Nancy Boggess|last14=Kelsall | first14=T. | last15=Moseley | first15=S. H. | last16=Silverberg | first16=R. F. | last17=Smoot | first17=G. F. | last18=Wilkinson | first18=D. T. | date=January 1994 | title=Cosmic microwave background dipole spectrum measured by the COBE FIRAS instrument | journal=Astrophysical Journal | volume=420 | page=445 | doi=10.1086/173575 | bibcode=1994ApJ...420..445F }}. The most accurate measurement as of 2006 was achieved by the [[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe|WMAP]] experiment.</ref>
The luminous point-like cores of [[quasar]]s were the first "high-redshift" ({{math|''z'' > 0.1}}) objects discovered before the improvement of telescopes allowed for the discovery of other high-redshift galaxies.{{cn|date=March 2023}}
For galaxies more distant than the [[Local Group]] and the nearby [[Virgo Cluster]], but within a thousand mega[[parsec]]s or so, the redshift is approximately proportional to the galaxy's distance. This correlation was first observed by [[Edwin Hubble]] and has come to be known as [[Hubble's law]]. [[Vesto Slipher]] was the first to discover galactic redshifts, in about
In the widely accepted cosmological model based on [[general relativity]], redshift is mainly a result of the expansion of space: this means that the farther away a galaxy is from us, the more the space has expanded in the time since the light left that galaxy, so the more the light has been stretched, the more redshifted the light is, and so the faster it appears to be moving away from us. Hubble's law follows in part from the [[Copernican principle]].<ref name="Peebles-1993">Peebles (1993).</ref> Because it is usually not known how [[luminosity|luminous]] objects are, measuring the redshift is easier than more direct distance measurements, so redshift is sometimes in practice converted to a crude distance measurement using Hubble's law.{{cn|date=March 2023}} [[Gravitation]]al interactions of galaxies with each other and clusters cause a significant [[variance|scatter]] in the normal plot of the Hubble diagram. The [[peculiar velocity|peculiar velocities]] associated with galaxies superimpose a rough trace of the [[mass]] of [[virial theorem|virialized objects]] in the universe. This effect leads to such phenomena as nearby galaxies (such as the [[Andromeda Galaxy]]) exhibiting blueshifts as we fall towards a common [[barycenter]], and redshift maps of clusters showing a [[fingers of god]] effect due to the scatter of peculiar velocities in a roughly spherical distribution.<ref name="Peebles-1993"/> This added component gives cosmologists a chance to measure the masses of objects independent of the [[mass-to-light ratio]] (the ratio of a galaxy's mass in solar masses to its brightness in solar luminosities), an important tool for measuring [[dark matter]].<ref>{{cite book | first1=James | last1=Binney | first2=Scott | last2=Treimane | title=Galactic dynamics|publisher=Princeton University Press | isbn=978-0-691-08445-9 | date=1994 }}</ref>{{Page needed|date=March 2023}}
Line 425 ⟶ 363:
===Highest redshifts===
{{see also|List of the most distant astronomical objects#List of most distant objects by type{{!}}List of most distant objects by type}}
[[File:Comoving distance and lookback time (Planck 2018).png|thumb|upright=1.8|[[Comoving and proper distances|Comoving distance]] and [[lookback time]] for the Planck 2018 cosmology parameters, from redshift 0 to 15, with distance (blue solid line) on the left axis, and time (orange dashed line) on the right. Note that the time that has passed (in giga years) from a given redshift until now is not the same as the distance (in giga light years) light would have traveled from that redshift, due to the expansion of space over the intervening period.]]
Currently, the objects with the highest known redshifts are galaxies and the objects producing gamma ray bursts.{{cn|date=August 2024}} The most reliable redshifts are from [[spectroscopic]] data,{{cn|date=August 2024}} and the highest-confirmed spectroscopic redshift of a galaxy is that of [[JADES-GS-
| title=A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at z=11.1 Measured with Hubble Space Telescope Grism Spectroscopy
| last1=Oesch | first1=P. A. | last2=Brammer | first2=G.
Line 455 ⟶ 393:
| bibcode=2010Natur.467..940L | arxiv=1010.4312
| s2cid=4414781
}}</ref> at a redshift of {{math|''z'' {{=}} 8.6}}, corresponding to 600 million years after the Big Bang.
Slightly less reliable are [[Lyman-break galaxy|Lyman-break]] redshifts, the highest of which is the lensed galaxy A1689-zD1 at a redshift {{math|''z'' {{=}} 7.5}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Watson|first1=Darach|last2=Christensen|first2=Lise|last3=Knudsen|first3=Kirsten Kraiberg|last4=Richard|first4=Johan|last5=Gallazzi|first5=Anna|last6=Michałowski|first6=Michał Jerzy|title=A dusty, normal galaxy in the epoch of reionization|journal=Nature|volume=519|issue=7543|pages=327–330|doi=10.1038/nature14164|arxiv = 1503.00002 |bibcode = 2015Natur.519..327W|pmid=25731171|year=2015|s2cid=2514879}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | title=Discovery of a Very Bright Strongly Lensed Galaxy Candidate at z ~ 7.6
| first1=L. D. | last1=Bradley | first2=R. J. | last2=Bouwens
Line 481 ⟶ 421:
| title=GRB 090423 reveals an exploding star at the epoch of re-ionization
| last1=Salvaterra | first1=R. | first2=M. Della | last2=Valle
| last3=Campana | first3=S. |author-link3=Sergio Campana (astrophysicist)| last4=Chincarini | first4=G.
| last5=Covino | first5=S. | last6=d'Avanzo | first6=P.
| last7=Fernández-Soto | first7=A. | last8=Guidorzi | first8=C.
Line 499 ⟶ 439:
| doi=10.1038/nature08445 | date=2009 | pmid=19865166
| s2cid=205218263 | bibcode=2009Natur.461.1258S |arxiv=0906.1578
}}</ref> The most distant-known quasar, [[ULAS J1342+0928]], is at {{math|''z'' {{=}} 7.54}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.mit.edu/2017/scientists-observe-supermassive-black-hole-infant-universe-1206|title=Scientists observe supermassive black hole in infant universe|website=MIT News |publisher=Massachusetts Institute of Technology |date=2017-12-06 |first=Jennifer |last=Chu}}</ref><ref name="Nature-2018-01">{{cite journal |last1=Bañados |first1=Eduardo |last2=Venemans |first2=Bram P. |last3=Mazzucchelli |first3=Chiara |last4=Farina |first4=Emanuele P. |last5=Walter |first5=Fabian |last6=Wang |first6=Feige |last7=Decarli |first7=Roberto |last8=Stern |first8=Daniel |last9=Fan |first9=Xiaohui |last10=Davies |first10=Frederick B. |last11=Hennawi |first11=Joseph F. |last12=Simcoe |first12=Robert A. |last13=Turner |first13=Monica L. |last14=Rix |first14=Hans-Walter |last15=Yang |first15=Jinyi |last16=Kelson |first16=Daniel D. |last17=Rudie |first17=Gwen C. |last18=Winters |first18=Jan Martin |title=An 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at a redshift of 7.5 |journal=Nature |date=January 2018 |volume=553 |issue=7689 |pages=473–476 |doi=10.1038/nature25180 |pmid=29211709 |arxiv=1712.01860 |bibcode=2018Natur.553..473B |s2cid=205263326 }}</ref> The highest-known redshift radio galaxy (TGSS1530) is at a redshift {{math|''z'' {{=}} 5.72}}<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Saxena|first1=A.|date=2018|title=Discovery of a radio galaxy at z = 5.72|journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society|volume=480|issue=2|pages=2733–2742|arxiv=1806.01191|bibcode=2018MNRAS.480.2733S|doi=10.1093/mnras/sty1996|doi-access=free |s2cid=118830412}}</ref> and the highest-known redshift molecular material is the detection of emission from the CO molecule from the quasar SDSS J1148+5251 at {{math|''z'' {{=}} 6.42}}.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1038/nature01821 | title = Molecular gas in the host galaxy of a quasar at redshift z = 6.42 | date = 2003 | last1 = Walter | first1 = Fabian | last2 = Bertoldi | first2 = Frank | last3 = Carilli | first3 = Chris | last4 = Cox | first4 = Pierre | last5 = Lo | first5 = K. Y. | last6 = Neri | first6 = Roberto | last7 = Fan | first7 = Xiaohui | last8 = Omont | first8 = Alain | last9 = Strauss | first9 = Michael A. | last10 = Menten | first10 = Karl M. | journal = Nature | volume = 424 | issue = 6947 | pages = 406–8 | pmid = 12879063 |bibcode=2003Natur.424..406W|arxiv = astro-ph/0307410 |s2cid = 4419009| display-authors = 4 }}</ref>
''Extremely red objects'' (EROs) are [[Radio astronomy#Astronomical sources|astronomical sources]] of radiation that radiate energy in the red and near infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum. These may be starburst galaxies that have a high redshift accompanied by reddening from intervening dust, or they could be highly redshifted elliptical galaxies with an older (and therefore redder) stellar population.<ref>
Line 531 ⟶ 471:
The [[cosmic microwave background]] has a redshift of {{math|z {{=}} 1089}}, corresponding to an age of approximately 379,000 years after the Big Bang and a [[Comoving and proper distances|proper distance]] of more than 46 billion light-years.<ref name="ly93">
{{cite journal | last1 = Lineweaver | first1 = Charles | first2=Tamara M. | last2=Davis | date = 2005 | title = Misconceptions about the Big Bang | journal = Scientific American | volume = 292 | issue = 3 | pages = 36–45 | doi = 10.1038/scientificamerican0305-36 | bibcode = 2005SciAm.292c..36L }}</ref> The yet-to-be-observed first light from the oldest [[Population III stars]], not long after atoms first formed and the CMB ceased to be absorbed almost completely, may have redshifts in the range of {{math|20 < ''z'' < 100}}.<ref>{{cite journal|bibcode=2006MNRAS.373L..98N|arxiv = astro-ph/0604050 |doi = 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00251.x|title=The first stars in the Universe|date=2006|last1=Naoz|first1=S.|last2=Noter|first2=S.|last3=Barkana|first3=R.|journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters|volume=373|issue = 1 |pages=L98–L102 |doi-access = free |s2cid = 14454275 }}</ref> Other high-redshift events predicted by physics but not presently observable are the [[cosmic neutrino background]] from about two seconds after the Big Bang (and a redshift in excess of {{math|''z'' > 10{{sup|10}}}})<ref>{{cite journal|bibcode=2006PhR...429..307L|arxiv = astro-ph/0603494 |doi = 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.04.001|title=Massive neutrinos and cosmology|date=2006|last1=Lesgourgues|first1=J|last2=Pastor|first2=S|journal=Physics Reports|volume=429|issue=6|pages=307–379 |s2cid = 5955312 }}</ref> and the cosmic [[gravitational wave background]] emitted directly from [[inflation (cosmology)|inflation]] at a redshift in excess of {{math|''z'' > 10{{sup|25}}}}.<ref>{{cite journal|bibcode=2005PhyU...48.1235G|arxiv = gr-qc/0504018 |doi = 10.1070/PU2005v048n12ABEH005795|title=Relic gravitational waves and cosmology|date=2005|last1=Grishchuk|first1=Leonid P|journal=Physics-Uspekhi|volume=48|issue=12|pages=1235–1247 |s2cid = 11957123 }}</ref>
In June 2015, astronomers reported evidence for [[Stellar population#Population III stars|Population III stars]] in the [[Cosmos Redshift 7]] [[galaxy]] at {{math|''z'' {{=}} 6.60}}. Such stars are likely to have existed in the very early universe (i.e., at high redshift), and may have started the production of [[chemical element]]s heavier than [[hydrogen]] that are needed for the later formation of [[planet]]s and [[life]] as we know it.<ref name="AJ-20150604">{{cite journal |last1=Sobral |first1=David |last2=Matthee |first2=Jorryt |last3=Darvish |first3=Behnam |last4=Schaerer |first4=Daniel |last5=Mobasher |first5=Bahram |last6=Röttgering |first6=Huub J. A. |last7=Santos |first7=Sérgio |last8=Hemmati |first8=Shoubaneh |title=Evidence For POPIII-Like Stellar Populations In The Most Luminous LYMAN-α Emitters At The Epoch Of Re-Ionisation: Spectroscopic Confirmation |date=4 June 2015 |journal=[[The Astrophysical Journal]] |doi=10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/139 |bibcode=2015ApJ...808..139S |volume=808 |issue=2 |page=139|arxiv=1504.01734|s2cid=18471887 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20150617">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |title=Astronomers Report Finding Earliest Stars That Enriched Cosmos |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/18/science/space/astronomers-report-finding-earliest-stars-that-enriched-cosmos.html |date=17 June 2015 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=17 June 2015 }}</ref>
Line 568 ⟶ 508:
| bibcode=2005MNRAS.362..505C | arxiv=astro-ph/0501174
| doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09318.x
| doi-access=free | s2cid=6906627| display-authors=4
}} [http://msowww.anu.edu.au/2dFGRS/ 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey homepage] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070205010241/http://msowww.anu.edu.au/2dFGRS/ |date=2007-02-05 }}</ref> The [[Sloan Digital Sky Survey]] (SDSS), is ongoing as of 2013 and aims to measure the redshifts of around 3 million objects.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.sdss3.org/ | access-date=2023-03-20 | title=SDSS-III | website=www.sdss3.org }}</ref> SDSS has recorded redshifts for galaxies as high as 0.8, and has been involved in the detection of [[quasar]]s beyond {{math|''z'' {{=}} 6}}. The [[DEEP2 Redshift Survey]] uses the [[Keck telescopes]] with the new "DEIMOS" [[spectrograph]]; a follow-up to the pilot program DEEP1, DEEP2 is designed to measure faint galaxies with redshifts 0.7 and above, and it is therefore planned to provide a high-redshift complement to SDSS and 2dF.<ref>{{cite conference | title=Science objectives and early results of the DEEP2 redshift survey| first1=Marc | last1=Davis | author2=DEEP2 collaboration |date=2002 | conference=Conference on Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation, Waikoloa, Hawaii, 22–28 Aug 2002 | arxiv=astro-ph/0209419 | bibcode=2003SPIE.4834..161D | doi=10.1117/12.457897 }}</ref>
Line 584 ⟶ 524:
=== Doppler blueshift ===
[[File:Redshift blueshift.svg|thumb|Doppler redshift and blueshift]]
[[Doppler effect|Doppler]] blueshift is caused by movement of a source towards the observer. The term applies to any decrease in wavelength and increase in frequency caused by relative motion, even outside the [[visible spectrum]]. Only objects moving at near-[[Relativistic speed|relativistic speeds]] toward the observer are noticeably bluer to the [[naked eye]], but the wavelength of any reflected or emitted photon or other particle is shortened in the direction of travel.<ref>{{cite book|title=In Quest of the Universe | first1=Karl F. | last1=Kuhn | first2=Theo | last2=Koupelis |year= 2004|publisher=[[Jones & Bartlett Publishers]]|isbn=978-0-7637-0810-8|pages=122–3}}</ref>
Doppler blueshift is used in [[astronomy]] to determine relative motion:
Line 595 ⟶ 535:
=== Gravitational blueshift ===
[[Image:Gravitional well.jpg|thumb|[[Matter waves]] (protons, electrons, photons, etc.) falling into a [[gravity well]] become more energetic and undergo observer-independent blueshifting.]]
Unlike the ''relative'' Doppler blueshift, caused by movement of a source towards the observer and thus dependent on the received angle of the photon, gravitational blueshift is ''absolute'' and does not depend on the received angle of the photon:
Line 603 ⟶ 542:
==== Blue outliers ====
There are faraway [[active galaxies]] that show a blueshift in their [[Oxygen|[O III]]] emission [[Emission spectrum|lines]]. One of the largest blueshifts is found in the narrow-line [[quasar]], [[PG 1543+489]], which has a relative velocity of -1150 km/s.<ref name="Aoki2005" /> These types of galaxies are called "blue outliers".<ref name="Aoki2005" />
===Cosmological blueshift===
Line 652 ⟶ 591:
[[Category:Astronomical spectroscopy]]
[[Category:Doppler effects]]
[[Category:Effects of
[[Category:Physical cosmology]]
[[Category:Physical quantities]]
|