Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors should not be punitive: Difference between revisions

▲Wikipedia has various [[WP:sanctions (essay)|actions that can be taken against editors]] for certain violations, such as [[WP:VAND|vandalism]], [[WP:EDITWAR|edit warring]], [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule violations]], [[WP:SOCK|sock puppetry]], or other forms of [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]]. These include temporary or indefinite [[WP:BLOCK|blocks]] and [[WP:BAN|bans]]. These are punishments according to common definitions: they are [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/punish penalties imposed because of offenses and violations], and admins are [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/english/punish inflicting these penalties or sanctions because of these offenses]. It may seem harsh that some people are given this treatment, but it is important to remember that these sanctions are intended to be significantly ''preventative'', not exclusively ''punitive''.

▲Some editors, even some [[WP:ADMIN|administrators]] on Wikipedia forget [[WP:ENC|why we are here]] and begin to adopt a '''punitive model''' for Wikipedia politics. They support [[WP:BLOCK|blocks]], [[WP:BAN|bans]], and [[WP:AE|enforcement of Arbitration Committee sanctions]] in order to exact retribution on "bad users" rather than helping to create and improve encyclopedic content. This is regrettable and problematic, not to mention contrary to the reason for blocks, bans, and enforcements as stated in the Wikipedia guidelines and policies linked in the previous sentence. When proposing or supporting an action that could easily be interpreted to be punishment, ask yourself, "Will this action help make the content on Wikipedia better?" If the answer is not an unequivocal "yes" and you still end up supporting the action, you may be an adherent to the punitive model of Wikipedia. This may also mean you enjoy the perceived "power" that you get from enforcing your will through the various features (or bugs) of the Wikipedia community.

▲Administrators should follow a '''preventative model''' for their actions with a goal of curbing disruptive or harmful behavior from editors rather than trying to punish them. [[WP:Topic ban|Topic bans]], [[WP:Page protection|page protections]] and so on are in some cases more helpful to the project than [[WP:Indefinite block|indefinite blocks]] or [[WP:Community ban|community bans]]. Short blocks may easily be interpreted as [[WP:GAME|gamy]] slaps on the wrist that just serve to aggravate rather than enlighten. If you have a problem with the actions of a user, why not try to discuss the matter with her or him before blocking?