National Institutional Ranking Framework: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m wikilink
formatting
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 55:
*A suitable metric has been proposed which computes a score under each sub-head. The sub-head scores are then added to obtain scores for each individual head. The overall score is computed-based on the weights allotted to each head. The overall score can take a maximum value of 100.
*The committee recommended the classification of institutions into two categories:
:*'''Category A institutions:''' These are institutions of national importance set up by Acts of Parliament, State Universities, Deemed-to-be Universities, Private Universities and other autonomous institutions.
:*'''Category B institutions:''' These are institutions affiliated to a University and do not enjoy full academic autonomy.
 
==Parameters and their weightages==
Line 273:
 
==Criticism==
As in every part of the world, there is constructive criticism with a purpose & projected criticism more or less a rant by those who feel hard done by the rankings.
At least there has been an effort by the GOI to establish quantitative assessment upon a qualitative framework (something which was totally lacking earlier) is totally forgotten.
The rankings have been heavily criticized as an attempt to manipulate students, companies and general public.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bajpai |first=G. S. |date=2022-08-09 |title=Rankings that make no sense |url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/rankings-that-make-no-sense/article65750428.ece |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230124100518/https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/rankings-that-make-no-sense/article65750428.ece |archive-date=24 January 2023 |access-date=2023-01-24 |work=The Hindu |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Tyagi |first=Akshat |date=2018-04-07 |title=The HRD'S NIRF Ranking of Colleges is Laughable & Ridiculous |url=https://www.thequint.com/news/education/opinion-education-india-college-ranking-system-a-critique-teaching-learning |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230124100518/https://www.thequint.com/news/education/opinion-education-india-college-ranking-system-a-critique-teaching-learning |archive-date=24 January 2023 |access-date=2023-01-24 |website=TheQuint |language=en}}</ref> In spite of these criticisms, the government has done little to modify the methodologies or results of the rankings. The list was criticized for being incomplete, incoherent and bordering on the random in 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://thewire.in/121674/three-charts-show-whats-wrong-nirf-university-rankings/ |title=Three Charts Show What's Wrong With the NIRF University Rankings |access-date=6 April 2017 |archive-date=6 April 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170406155421/https://thewire.in/121674/three-charts-show-whats-wrong-nirf-university-rankings/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi raised objection on 2017 NIRF ranking, accusing it of being based on incomplete data.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://indianexpress.com/article/education/iit-bhu-raises-objection-on-nirf-ranking-2017-says-list-based-on-incomplete-data/ | title=IIT BHU raises objection on NIRF ranking 2017, says list based on 'incomplete data' | newspaper=The Indian Express | date=19 April 2017 | access-date=26 May 2019 | archive-date=26 May 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190526232358/https://indianexpress.com/article/education/iit-bhu-raises-objection-on-nirf-ranking-2017-says-list-based-on-incomplete-data/ | url-status=live }}</ref>