Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Pain | #UCB_Category 121/146 |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Abortion debate | #UCB_Category 12/36 |
||
(31 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Study of the different types of sensory perception of fetuses during pregnancy}}
{{expert needed|biology|date=August 2009|reason=discrepancy between abortion subsection and rest of the article, and lacking scientific consensus in article overall}}
'''Prenatal perception''' is the study of the extent of [[somatosensory]] and other types of [[perception]] during [[pregnancy]]. In practical terms, this means the study of [[fetus]]es; none of the accepted indicators of perception are present in [[embryo]]s. Studies in the field inform the [[abortion debate]], along with certain related pieces of legislation in countries affected by that debate. As of 2022, there is no [[scientific consensus]] on whether a fetus can feel pain.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Belluck |first=Pam |date=2013-09-17 |title=Complex Science at Issue in Politics of Fetal Pain |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/health/complex-science-at-issue-in-politics-of-fetal-pain.html |access-date=2022-09-20 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Levitan |first=Dave |date=2015-05-18 |title=Does a Fetus Feel Pain at 20 Weeks? |url=https://www.factcheck.org/2015/05/does-a-fetus-feel-pain-at-20-weeks/ |access-date=2022-09-20 |website=FactCheck.org |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Karni |first=Annie |date=2022-09-13 |title=Graham Proposes 15-Week Abortion Ban, Splitting Republicans |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/13/us/politics/lindsey-graham-abortion.html |access-date=2022-09-20 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>
==Prenatal hearing==
Numerous studies have found evidence indicating a fetus's ability to respond to auditory stimuli.
==Prenatal pain==
[[File:Pregnancy timeline.png|thumb|400px|right|Pregnancy timeline]]
The hypothesis that human fetuses are capable of perceiving [[pain]] in the first trimester has little support, although fetuses at
In March 2010, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists submitted a report,<ref name="royalcollege">{{Cite web|date=March 2010|title=Fetal Awareness – Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice|url=http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/RCOGFetalAwarenessWPR0610.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111002222748/http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/RCOGFetalAwarenessWPR0610.pdf
The report specifically identified the [[anterior cingulate]] as the area of the [[cerebral cortex]] responsible for pain processing. The anterior cingulate is part of the cerebral cortex, which begins to develop in the fetus at week 26. A co-author of that report revisited the evidence in 2020, specifically the functionality of the thalamic projections into the cortical [[subplate]], and posited "an immediate and unreflective pain experience...from as early as 12 weeks."<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Derbyshire|first1=Stuart WG|last2=Bockmann|first2=John C.|date=2020-01-01|title=Reconsidering fetal pain|url=https://jme.bmj.com/content/46/1/3|journal=Journal of Medical Ethics|language=en|volume=46|issue=1|pages=3–6|doi=10.1136/medethics-2019-105701|issn=0306-6800|pmid=31937669|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Electroencephalography indicates that the capacity for functional pain perception in premature infants does not exist before 29 or 30 weeks; a 2005 meta-analysis states that withdrawal reflexes and changes in heart rates and hormone levels in response to invasive procedures are reflexes that do not indicate fetal pain.<ref name="Lee"/>
Several lines of evidence suggest that a fetus does not awaken during its time in the womb. Much of the literature on fetal pain simply extrapolates from findings and research on premature babies. The presence of such chemicals as [[adenosine]], [[pregnanolone]], and [[prostaglandin]]-D<sub>2</sub> in both human and animal fetuses, indicate that the fetus is both [[sedation|sedated]] and [[anesthesia|anesthetized]] when in the womb. These chemicals are oxidized with the newborn's first few breaths and washed out of the tissues,
===Fetal anesthesia===
Direct fetal [[analgesia]] is used in only a minority of prenatal surgeries.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.3109/14767058.2012.718392 |title=Use of fetal analgesia during prenatal surgery |journal=The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine |volume=26 |pages=90–5 |year=2012 |last1=Bellieni |first1=Carlo V. |last2=Tei |first2=M. |last3=Stazzoni |first3=G. |last4=Bertrando |first4=S. |last5=Cornacchione |first5=S. |last6=Buonocore |first6=G. |issue=1 |pmid=22881840 |s2cid=46355976 }}</ref>
Some caution that unnecessary use of fetal anesthetic may pose potential health risks to the mother. "In the context of abortion, fetal analgesia would be used solely for beneficence toward the fetus, assuming fetal pain exists. This interest must be considered in concert with maternal safety and fetal effectiveness of any proposed anesthetic or analgesic technique. For instance, general anesthesia increases abortion morbidity and mortality for women and substantially increases the cost of abortion. Although placental transfer of many opioids and sedative-hypnotics has been determined, the maternal dose required for fetal analgesia is unknown, as is the safety for women at such doses.<ref name="Lee"/> Given the maternal risk involved and the lack of evidence of any potential benefit to the fetus, administering fetal anesthesia for abortion is not recommended.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine|last2=Society of Family Planning|last3=Norton|first3=Mary E.|last4=Cassidy|first4=Arianna|last5=Ralston|first5=Steven J.|last6=Chatterjee|first6=Debnath|last7=Farmer|first7=Diana|last8=Beasley|first8=Anitra D.|last9=Dragoman|first9=Monica|date=2022-02-01|title=Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #59: The use of analgesia and anesthesia for maternal-fetal procedures|url=https://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(21)00441-8/abstract|journal=Contraception|language=English|volume=106|pages=10–15|doi=10.1016/j.contraception.2021.10.003|issn=0010-7824|pmid=34740602|s2cid=243477250|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Fetal pain legislation may make abortions harder to obtain, because abortion clinics lack the equipment and expertise to supply fetal anesthesia. Currently, anesthesia is administered directly to fetuses only while they are undergoing surgery.<ref name="paul">{{cite news |last=Paul |first=Annie Murphy |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/magazine/10Fetal-t.html |title=The First Ache |work=New York Times |date=February 10, 2008}}</ref>
Doctors for a
==United States legislation==
===Federal legislation===
In 1985, questions about fetal pain were raised during congressional hearings concerning ''[[The Silent Scream]]''.<ref>Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-Ninth Congress. (May 21, 1985). [http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/gdoc/hearings/8/86601288/86601288_1.pdf First session on: The medical evidence concerning fetal pain.] S. Hrg. 99–429; Serial No. J-99-28, pages 10 and following</ref>
In 2013 during the [[113th Congress]], [[Trent Franks|Representative Trent Franks]] introduced a bill called the "[[Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act]]" (H.R. 1797). It passed in the House on June 18, 2013 and was received in the U.S. Senate, read twice, and referred to the Judiciary Committee.<ref>''[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?d113:h.r.1797: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act of 2013]{{Dead link|date=August 2021 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}'' H.R.1797, 113th Cong., 1st Sess. (2013)</ref>▼
▲In 2013 during the [[113th Congress]], [[Trent Franks|Representative Trent Franks]] introduced a bill called the "[[Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act]]" (H.R. 1797). It passed in the House on June 18, 2013, and was received in the U.S. Senate, read twice, and referred to the Judiciary Committee.<ref>''[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?d113:h.r.1797: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act of 2013]{{Dead link|date=August 2021 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}'' H.R.1797, 113th Cong., 1st Sess. (2013)</ref>
In 2004 during the [[108th Congress]], [[Sam Brownback|Senator Sam Brownback]] introduced a bill called the "[[Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act]]" for the stated purpose of "ensur[ing] that women seeking an abortion are fully informed regarding the pain experienced by their unborn child
===State legislation===
Subsequently, 25 states have examined similar legislation related to fetal pain and/or fetal anesthesia,<ref name="paul"/> and in 2010 [[Nebraska]] banned abortions after 20 weeks on the basis of fetal pain.<ref>Kliff, Sarah ''[http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/the-gaggle/2010/04/13/newly-passed-fetal-pain-bill-in-nebraska-is-a-big-deal.html Newly Passed 'Fetal Pain' Bill in Nebraska Is a Big Deal]'' The Daily Beast Apr 13, 2010</ref> Eight states – Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Alaska, South Dakota, and Texas – have passed laws which introduced information on fetal pain in their state-issued abortion-counseling literature, which one opponent of these laws, the [[Guttmacher Institute]] founded by Planned Parenthood, has called "generally irrelevant" and not in line "with the current medical literature".<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Gold Rachel Benson |author2=Nash Elizabeth | year = 2007 | title = State Abortion Counseling Policies and the Fundamental Principles of Informed Consent | url = http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/10/4/gpr100406.html | journal = Guttmacher Policy Review | volume = 10 | issue = 4 }}</ref> [[
==See also==
Line 55 ⟶ 54:
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070418153229/http://judiciary.house.gov/Oversight.aspx?ID=201 "Oversight Hearing on Pain of the Unborn"] from U.S. Congress, House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties (2005). This includes testimony both for and against proposed legislation dealing with fetal pain.
* [http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_pain.htm "Can a embryo or fetus feel pain? Various opinions and studies"] from Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. This site [http://www.religioustolerance.org/abortion.htm states]: "We feel that all women considering an abortion should be fully informed and as free as possible from outside pressure."
*
* Statement of National Abortion Federation Opposing H.R. 3442, the "Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act" (2008) [http://www.prochoice.org/pubs_research/publications/downloads/public_policy/UCPAA_NAF_Position.pdf PDF version] and [http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20061116044144/http://www.prochoice.org/policy/congress/fetal_pain.html HTML version].
* National Right to Life Committee's webpage of testimonies regarding fetal pain: [https://web.archive.org/web/20051226223517/http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/Fetal_Pain/index.html HTML version]
|