Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Telecommunications}}, {{WikiProject Computing}}. Tag: |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Telecommunications }}
{{WikiProject Computing }}
}}
== VBR not supported by hardware is a moot point ==
Perpetuating that VBR is not supported by hardware was a valid point in the 90's. Give examples of modern hardware not supporting it or i shall remove this moot point.
--Zaph--[[Special:Contributions/213.243.140.48|213.243.140.48]] ([[User talk:213.243.140.48|talk]]) 08:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
== Average bitrate = sound quality? ==
Line 52 ⟶ 61:
Many thanks to those who expanded upon my original musings in this "Pros & Cons" section (now Advantages and disadvantages), which were based on experimentation with CVBR back in Jan 2008 (in edits made as 83.67.145.51). In particular, thanks for the part about "fixed quality" encoding - which I can confirm from later experimentation to be a "more ideal" form of encoding now that constraints on storage size are of less importance. I also greatly appreciate the way that discussions on multi- and single-pass encoding, fixed quality, etc, have all got their own sections full of valuable info. This article is now becoming very broad and very enlightening and I look forward to the many more additions likely to be made in the next two year interval! As it is my Birthday, I shall consider this as my Birthday present. Thanks again: this is what Wiki is all about! I'm sure all the many contributors of this Wiki page since back in October 2002 would agree. --[[Special:Contributions/83.67.145.51|83.67.145.51]] ([[User talk:83.67.145.51|talk]]) 21:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)...
Thank you !!
== about bandwidth ==
is bandwidth constant in a network ? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/210.212.230.129|210.212.230.129]] ([[User talk:210.212.230.129|talk]]) 09:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Far fetched ==
To me it seems extremeley far-fetched that the VBR pattern may reveal the contents of what is spoken. Should unserious speculations be included in a Wikipedia lemma? Yes, I am aware that it is supported by a reference - but that does not say a lot to me! [[Special:Contributions/81.207.20.42|81.207.20.42]] ([[User talk:81.207.20.42|talk]]) 08:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
:Having read a paper on this before in connection with [[Opus (audio format)]], I'm convinced that the data provided is plausible in demonstrating that key spoken phrases that are rare enough may be statistically inferred from bitrate variations (in certain codecs at least). This may allow interested parties to focus brute-force decryption efforts on the most likely candidates, improving overall detection rates.[[User:Dynamicimanyd|Dynamicimanyd]] ([[User talk:Dynamicimanyd|talk]]) 19:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
== TVBR ==
What does TVBR stand for?--[[Special:Contributions/2A02:810A:11BF:E564:5AB:D9E:57E8:EF6D|2A02:810A:11BF:E564:5AB:D9E:57E8:EF6D]] ([[User talk:2A02:810A:11BF:E564:5AB:D9E:57E8:EF6D|talk]]) 20:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
== [...] or white noise will require a higher bit rate to encode without visible artifacts ==
Possibly outdated, as modern video codecs allow cheap signalling of white noise using noise modelling.
[[Special:Contributions/46.230.131.152|46.230.131.152]] ([[User talk:46.230.131.152|talk]]) 10:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
| |||