Talk:Congenital iodine deficiency syndrome: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
not needed
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Medicine}}.
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Medicinebanner shell|class=Start |importance=mid |dermatology=yes |dyk=yes}}
{{WikiProject Disability}}
{{Image requested|medical subjects}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=mid |dermatology=yes |dyk=yes}}
}}
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
 
Line 26 ⟶ 28:
==rewrite==
I got rid of the nonsense about Balzac and massacres. It was apparently based on a misreading of a single French website speculating that cretins might have been the origin of the [[woodwose]] legends. The original contributor didnt bother to actually read the Balzac source, which says nothing of the kind. There are lots of prima facie problems with this hypothesis and it doesnt warrant inclusion here without better sourcing. [[User:Alteripse|alteripse]] 15:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
*Britannica lists the most likely etymology for certain words, and since every dictionary I've seen, including [[OED]], doesn't even question whether the etymology came from anywhere but the Latin word for "Christian", it should remain as is. No matter who complains for whatever reasons, we are not in the business of doing [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]]. --<small>'''[[User:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">BRIAN</fontspan>]]'''[[User_talk:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">0918</fontspan>]]</small> 18:12, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 
First, I agree that Christian is the most commonly cited dictionary etymology but most of the online dictionary derivations derive from the same source. It doesnt make sense to provide a single etymology in the first sentence and then later on explain that it is uncertain and there have been other alternatives.
Line 35 ⟶ 37:
 
I looked at your user page. It doesnt match this behavior. Are you having a bad day? [[User:Alteripse|alteripse]] 18:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
*This is the talk page for [[Cretinism]]. &mdash; <small>[[User:Brian0918|<b><font style="color=:black;">BRIAN</font></b>]][[User_talk:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">0918</fontspan>]] • 2005-12-11 18:33</small>
*The lead section is supposed to summarize the article. Britannica provides the "most likely" etymology in the first sentence, and we should be inclined to do the same. Simply because another possible etymology has been found doesn't mean the most likely etymology should not be front and center. &mdash; <small>[[User:Brian0918|<b><font style="color=:black;">BRIAN</font></b>]][[User_talk:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">0918</fontspan>]] • 2005-12-11 18:33</small>
 
I know its the talk page. You were the one making changes without discussing them here and I posted the note on your user page as a courtesy notice, not an affront.
Line 45 ⟶ 47:
 
I won't change it til you respond but the dictionary list does not belong in the article. [[User:Alteripse|alteripse]] 18:55, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
*What is your source for the "inability to sin..." part? --<small>'''[[User:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">BRIAN</fontspan>]]'''[[User_talk:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">0918</fontspan>]]</small> 19:17, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 
It is one of the oldest of the explanations and the one I have seen most often. Here is a long article on this topic from the Atlantic Monthly of 1858: [http://www.disabilitymuseum.org/lib/docs/1385.htm]. [[User:Alteripse|alteripse]] 19:38, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
*While I'm fine with your addition, I think it would be better to leave in the rationale for the OED's origin, namely that "the mod. Romanic languages translate the Latin term to "human creature", as distinguished from beasts, with the implication that, although a person afflicted with cretinism is mentally and physically deformed, he is still human." If possible, it would would also help to specifically explain the rationale behind the Atlantic Monthly's origins, no matter how obvious it seems. In any case, we can agree that the Latin word for "Christian" is the most widely accepted etymology, and leave that in the lead/summary section. --<small>'''[[User:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">BRIAN</fontspan>]]'''[[User_talk:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">0918</fontspan>]]</small> 19:48, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 
OK, how about
''The connecting meaning between '''Christian''' and '''cretin''' is not obvious. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the term ''Christian'' is a reminder of the humanity of the afflicted, a human "creature" in contrast to brute beasts. Other sources have suggested ''Christian'' refers to the inability to sin of a person who lacks the capacity to distinguish right from wrong.'' I don't like the piece of the OED phrase by itself because I don't think we need to remind the reader that french is a romance language, and whether the term cretin originated in post-latin pre-french dialect that eventually became helvetian, provencal, or lyonnais french, or left no offspring, is beyond secure knowledge and the needs of this article. Isn't the simpler version faithful to the meaning? [[User:Alteripse|alteripse]] 20:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
*Alright, I think that takes care of it. --<small>'''[[User:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">BRIAN</fontspan>]]'''[[User_talk:Brian0918|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">0918</fontspan>]]</small> 20:28, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 
Just a small note or suggestion as to the etymology of the word cretin. A lecturer told me it was from post crusade times, when they found all the iodine deficient christians who had been driven to the alps by the muslims. Since there was a lack of iodine those people produced such symptoms and the muslims had used the local (basque i think it was) word for 'christian' to name them...and so cretin became synonomous with iodine deficiency and the big neck hyperetc
Line 130 ⟶ 132:
 
Just wanted to note that '''cretin''' (meaning "Christian") was also another word used to describe [[intellectual disability]], but like idiot, imbecile, moron, mongol, and retard, have been replaced because of their offensive connotations. This disease is clearly relating to '''Congenital iodine deficiency syndrome''' as per the image, and should be renamed as such. The religious connotations of the current article is evident, and unacceptable in modern society [[Special:Contributions/182.255.99.214|182.255.99.214]] ([[User talk:182.255.99.214|talk]]) 09:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 
== Upcoming edits ==
 
I plan a few edits of this article, and welcome scrutiny by those who have contributed to this article in the past. Regards, [[User:IiKkEe|IiKkEe]] ([[User talk:IiKkEe|talk]]) 14:56, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
: Thanks, [[User:IiKkEe|IiKkEe]] — for this and all your contributions to Wikipedia. We do appreciate it, though interactions may seem brusque sometimes.
:
: On the off chance that you are looking for further topics, this article really needs a Prevention section (as do many disease articles). I apologise for not having added one yet. --[[User:Pmj|pmj]] ([[User talk:Pmj|talk]]) 20:35, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
:: Thank you for your kind feedback, [[User:Pmj|pmj]] ([[User talk:Pmj|talk]]). I will keep your Prevention suggestion in mind as I continue editing here.
::
:: I am curious about two of your comments. First, I am not clear why you believe some interactions regarding my edits may seem brusque. Could you give be an example of an interaction involving me that you believe fits that description? Second, you thanked me for *all* my contributions to WP. Have you reviewed my edits of other articles? I believe I am up to over 15,000 edits at this point. Regards, [[User:IiKkEe|IiKkEe]] ([[User talk:IiKkEe|talk]]) 15:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
::: Regretfully, I don't have time to read all your contributions; the thanks was in the spirit of appreciation for your body of work. I believe in the power of a simple thankyou (or even using MediaWiki's thank functionality) to remind members of our community that they are valued.
:::
::: As you are no doubt aware, online communication generally lacks non-verbal cues, and is often abrupt and terse. It's not the way we'd generally talk to co-workers in person, for instance, when we would generally add more context and softening to something like my reversion edit description. Under this barrage, thinner skinned editors tend to leave sooner or later. You and I have not — and that means something — but I feel it's beneficial to be reminded of this from time to time in order to better keep things in perspective. --[[User:Pmj|pmj]] ([[User talk:Pmj|talk]]) 20:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
:
:[[User:Pmj|pmj]] I appreciate your additional explanation, and thank you for your kind words regarding my WP body of work! Could you by chance suggest any specific articles where I might turn my attention? [[User:IiKkEe|IiKkEe]] ([[User talk:IiKkEe|talk]]) 14:35, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
== "Cretinism " listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Cretinism]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Cretinism ]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-family:Segoe Script">[[User:Jay| Jay]]</span> [[User talk:Jay|(''talk'')]] 06:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)