Content deleted Content added
WP:India Tagging ! (False Positive ??) (Plugin++) Added {{WP India}}. |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WP India}}. Tag: |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|auto=yes|andhra=yes|andhra-importance=low|geography=yes|geography-importance=low}}
}}
{{merged-from|Bramhamgarimatham|talk=no|date=August 2010}}
{{merged-from|Narayana Swamy Ashramam|talk=no|date=November 2015}}
{{GOCEreviewed|user=Miniapolis|date=21 February 2014|issues=Translation too rough for copyedit}}
==File:Eeswaramma varu.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
{|
|-
| [[File:Image-x-generic.svg|100px]]
| An image used in this article, [[commons:File:Eeswaramma varu.jpg|File:Eeswaramma varu.jpg]], has been nominated for deletion at [[Wikimedia Commons]] in the following category: ''Deletion requests October 2011''
;What should I do?
''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is [[WP:NFCC|non-free]] then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no [[WP:FUR|fair use rationale]] then it cannot be uploaded or used.
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 15:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
|}
== Navaratna Mandapam and Veda Pathashala ==
On 17 April 2015 [[User:Vin09|Vin09]] removed the following section and image indicating: ''added see also section''. However, no "see also section" was added.
::Navaratna Mandapam and Veda Pathashala
:::[[File:Navaratna mandapam.jpg|thumb|[[Navaratna (architecture)|Navaratna]] Mandapam]]
:::500 years ago, Sri [[Pothuluru Veerabrahmendra|Veerabrahmendra Swami]], prophesied in ''kalagnanam'' (knowledge about the future) that a temple would be constructed in Kandimallayapalle (Brahmamgari Mutt) in Kaliyuga before his arrival. Sri Patnala Sanyasi Rao, an Industrialist from Chennai, was destined to be the builder of this temple at Brahmamgari Matam. The architectural style of this temple is termed [[navaratna (architecture)|navaratna]], as nine temples are associated in one structure.
:::* Sree Heramba Ganapathi Temple on South East corner,
:::* [[Manu (Hinduism)|Manu]] brahma (Shiva) temple with Adisakthi (Parvathi) is in the East,
:::* [[Maya (illusion)|Maya]] brahma (Vishnumurthi) with Parasakthi (Lakshmi) is in the South,
:::* Twasthabrahma (Chaturmukha Brahma) with Itcha Sakthi (Saraswathi) is to the West,
:::* [[Shilpi]] brahma (Indra) with Kriyasakthi (Sachidevi) is at the North,
:::* ViswagnaBrahma (Surya) with Gnanasakthi (Sanja Devi) is at Northeast,
:::* [[Vishwakarma]] (vedaPitha) with Gayathri Deva (Vedamatha) is at the center,
:::* Venugopala swamy temple at the Southwest,
:::* Sri Sanari vishewswara swamy at the northwest and 125 Gothra rishi idols are installed in the temple premises.<nowiki><ref></nowiki>{{cite web|url=http://kalagnani.com/apps/videos/videos/show/8436634-3093-3105-3114- |title=కడప – newstv-rayalaseema |publisher=Newstv-rayalaseema.webs.com |date=4 May 2010 |accessdate=11 October 2011}}{{dead link|date=July 2014}}<nowiki></ref></nowiki>
:::A Veda [[Pathashala]] (school) is being run on this temple premises.
No reason was given for the deletion, and if it in fact verifies, then it is an important part of the village. There are a several videos purporting to show thw site: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDr2xKxmj0c here], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ognSvlwUdfg here] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkPqULOemHE here] --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 04:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
:I might have posted wrong summary. But the reason is it is not a temple article. It is settlement. The temple articles are totally different like [[Tirumala]], [[Tirumala Venkateswara Temple]]. But as per census of India 2011, there was no mention in the respective mandal. Google maps also shows it with different name. I'm unsure after checking some references. I hope you can move ahead, we will see if any more suggestions come up.--'''<span>[[User:Vin09|<span style="color:#0404B4">Vin09</span>]] [[User talk:Vin09|<span style="color:#5882FA">(talk)</span>]]</span>''' 06:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
::Actually, most temples do not have their own articles, and are discussed instead in a paragraph or two, sometimes only a sentence, in the article on the place where they are located. As you may notice, the Narayana Swamy temple was moved back here after a discussion about its separate article at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narayana Swamy Ashramam]]. The distinction that you are drawing between "temple articles" and "settlement articles" does not apply. It is just like with minor battles, while major battles have their own articles, minor battles are usually discussed in the article that is about the place where the battle occurred, and that is often a settlement article. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 18:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
| |||