Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 35:
== [[Moon landing]] ==
 
I've been applauding your work on the Moon landing article, and deleted a previous comment which was actually meant for another editor, which got pasted onto your talk page by mistake. Apologies for that. Best regards. --[[User:OliverTwisted|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006699;"><b><i>Oliver</i></b></fontspan>]]<b><i>[[User:OliverTwisted|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#33CC99;">Twisted </fontspan>]]</i></b><sup>[[User_talk:OliverTwisted|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#006699"; font-size="1px:x-small;"> (Talk) </fontspan>]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/OliverTwisted|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#33CC99"; font-size="1px:x-small;">(Stuff)</fontspan>]] 03:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 
== Some advice on moving pages ==
Line 62:
The more recent post by you wasn't quite as neutral, but I understand your frustration. I would like to pursue your concerns as I think that they are important for the GA assessment. One of the things I was going to do before things went sideways was get the opinion of a peer reviewer about the lead. I still intend to do that. Now things are settling down a bit (with Skip having agreed to stay away from the article for awhile, AdenR warned about edit warring, and the article protected) so we can get back to it. I hope that you will continue editing on the Sustainability page. We need good editors there. [[User:Sunray|Sunray]] ([[User talk:Sunray|talk]]) 02:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 
== Web Bot Edits ==
 
Thanks for you feedback regarding my edits of the Web Bot entry. As you have pointed out, I am new again to Wikipedia. I will review the documents you suggested before making further edits.
Line 103:
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/11&oldid=866998401 -->
 
== See talk ==
 
Is not a good reason to revert. Especially when the talk page is long and there is no express mention of "Shrier claims" that is obviously applying to your revert. And doubly so when it directly goes against a well regarded MOS guideline. [[User:Aircorn|Air<b style="color: green;">''corn''</b>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 15:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
::There's been a substantial discussion on the article talk page. Irreversible Damage is a political work designed to back door anti-trans bigotry into the mainstream and we should not be blind to the fact that it's being written and distributed in bad faith.[[User:Voiceofreason01|Voiceofreason01]] ([[User talk:Voiceofreason01#top|talk]]) 15:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
:::That is irrelevant, all that matters is consensus, PAGs and sources. Can you point to the part where consensus says [[WP:CLAIM]] can be overridden because I can't find it. [[User:Aircorn|Air<b style="color: green;">''corn''</b>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 15:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
:::::Shrier is making a false claim that's intended to be deceptive. We don't need to propagandize for her. It's included in the lead because it's important to understanding why she's notable. You do not [[wp:own]] the article. If you have an alternate way of reworking the lead please suggest it in the article talk page. [[User:Voiceofreason01|Voiceofreason01]] ([[User talk:Voiceofreason01#top|talk]]) 15:45, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
::::::What has own got to do with it? You are the one changing the article from the stable version. I am talking about ignoring a mos guideline. I am assuming that there is no discussion about this as I can't find it and you are avoiding pointing to it. BTW the article is not about Shrier, but her book. [[User:Aircorn|Air<b style="color: green;">''corn''</b>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 00:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
:::::::Irreversible Damage is cynically designed to attack transgender people and it's only notable because a far right religious group is running a multi-million dollar media campaign to promote it. In a perfect world Wikipedia wouldn't repeat hate speech at all but since the book(and Shrier) are regrettably notable the article should reflect that. We don't need to blindly allow ourselves to be manipulated by sources operating in bad faith. [[WP:IAR]] this is a rare case where bending the manual of style rules makes the article better. [[User:Voiceofreason01|Voiceofreason01]] ([[User talk:Voiceofreason01#top|talk]]) 14:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 
== Discretionary sanctions alert ==
Line 121 ⟶ 112:
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] 15:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
 
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
 
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
 
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
 
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->