User talk:Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 10
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
My talk page 2022
Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Photo Challenge Winner ![]() |
Congratulations!
Your picture Bailleul sur le vieux chemin de Lille.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Hedges, in November 2021. You can find the results of the challenge here. |
-- Jarekt (talk) 04:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Heritage Belgium 2021
Beste vriend van Wikimedia België, U hebt meegedaan met de fotowedstrijd. Gelieve het juryrapport te lezen. Helaas hebt u niet gewonnen. Toch hartelijk dank voor uw bijdrage; vanaf 1 juli kan u opnieuw deelnemen.
Cher ami de Wikimedia Belgique, Vous avez participé au concours photo. Veuillez lire le rapport du jury. Malheureusement, vous n'avez pas gagné. Cependant, merci beaucoup pour votre contribution; vous pourriez participer à nouveau à partir du 1er juillet.
Dear friend of Wikimedia Belgium, You have participated in the photo contest. Please read the jury report. Unfortunately you did not win. However, thank you very much for your contribution; you can participate again from July 1st. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Cher Geertivp
Thank you. pour votre notification, ce sera avec plaisir que je participerai à l'édition 2022 de juillet. Bien cordialement,--Pierre André (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Palosirkka (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Vieux Quebec. La Fresque des Québécois.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Asclepias (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:La côte sauvage à la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon 2012 (3).jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:La côte sauvage à la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon 2012 (3).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- @ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque0 Cordialement Pierre André (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Menhirs de Mané-Meur la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon.jpg
Copyright status: File:Menhirs de Mané-Meur la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Menhirs de Mané-Meur la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- @ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque. Cordialement --Pierre André (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bouquet d'automne Vera Ilyinichna Repina, by Ilia Répine- Tretyakov Gallery, Moscou.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ivan le Terrible et son fils Ivan le 16 novembre 1581, by Ilia Répine (1885) - Tretyakov Gallery, Moscou.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painting of Св. Николай. Икона, ГТГ (Icon of Saint Nicholas) from 14th-century in Tretyakov Gallery of Moscow, unknown artist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of Стрибог (Stribog) (1910), by Sergey Konenkov, Tretyakov gallery.- Moscow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Христос в величии Christ Pantocrator by Dionisius, 15th century, Tretyakov Gallery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Спас на престоле, с избранными святыми (Savior on the Throne, with a Selection of Saints), 13th-century, Tretyakov gallery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Знамение икона (Our Lady of the Sign), 13th-century, Tretyakov Gallery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Photos de réserves naturelles
Bonjour Pierre-André,
À l'occasion du mois de mai et en l'absence du concours Wiki Loves Earth, voici quelques propositions de buts de promenade à photographier dans les Hauts-de-France :
- Category:Réserve naturelle nationale de la tourbière alcaline de Marchiennes
- Category:Réserve naturelle régionale des monts de Baives
- Category:Réserve naturelle nationale du marais de Vesles-et-Caumont
- Category:Réserve naturelle régionale de Grande-Synthe
- Category:Réserve naturelle régionale de Pantegnies
- Category:Réserve naturelle régionale de Pont d'Ardres
- Category:Réserve naturelle régionale des prairies du val de Sambre
- Category:Réserve naturelle régionale des prairies humides de la ferme du Moulin Fontaine
- Category:Réserve naturelle régionale du pré communal d'Ambleteuse
Meilleures salutations,
Pmau (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Pmau, merci pour ces quelques propositions de buts de promenade à photographier dans les Hauts-de-France. J'en prends bonne note pour y organiser quelques randonnées en Juillet/Août. Bien cordialement,
--Pierre André (talk) 10:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Pmau, comme convenu j'ai organisé une rando autour de Marchiennes, en incluant la récente Category:Réserve naturelle nationale de la tourbière alcaline de Marchiennes, la mairie de Marchiennes a confirmé qu'il n'y a pas encore de chemin balisé. et que les seules visites se font occasionnellement avec des guides; la rando passant par la Category:Réserve naturelle régionale du pré des Nonnettes, j'y ai pris quelques clichés. Je ne perd pas de vue les quelques propositions de buts de promenade. Bien amicalement à vous. Meilleures salutations, Pierre André (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour Pmau, merci pour ces quelques propositions de buts de promenade à photographier dans les Hauts-de-France. J'en prends bonne note pour y organiser quelques randonnées en Juillet/Août. Bien cordialement,
Copyright status: File:Sosanto (ship, 1960) in Dorignies en 2014.jpg
Copyright status: File:Sosanto (ship, 1960) in Dorignies en 2014.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sosanto (ship, 1960) in Dorignies en 2014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- @ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque. Cordialement Pierre André (talk) 10:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
VI nomination for fishing boat Schtroumpf
Hello Pierre André:
I have no idea what is going on with your image but believe some setting is amiss with either your camera or post-processing software.
I suggest you go back to your file history of both images and revert them to the previous version as it was better than the revision.
Regretfully, I cannot vote in VI support for your image as the image quality is just not there. I do appreciate your efforts to address the issues.
The Lumix DMC-TZ60 listed as the camera has a maximum sensor resolution of 4896 x 3672 pixels, at a typical 8-bit color depth level should generate a maximum file size approximately 18.10 MB. One of the camera settings is what quality level you make images at, and it should be set to the maximum or highest quality. Your file when uploaded to your PC should have a file size of approximately 18 MB. For making post-processing editing, working with a RAW file format is better than JPG. I export and upload JPG files to Commons but do all post-processing like lightening the image in the RAW format.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Port_d_Erquy_activit%C3%A9s_et_b%C3%A2teaux_en_2017_%2812%29.jpg/220px-Port_d_Erquy_activit%C3%A9s_et_b%C3%A2teaux_en_2017_%2812%29.jpg)
i
Your original file is listed in Commons at (4,753 × 3282 pixels, file size: 1.82 MB). I would expect the file size to be much larger, close to 16 MB for a file at a typical 8-bit color depth for this pixel count.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/93/Fishing_boat_Schtroumpf_in_Port_d_Erquy.jpg/220px-Fishing_boat_Schtroumpf_in_Port_d_Erquy.jpg)
Your cropped file of the boat is listed in Commons as (3119 × 3230 pixels, file size: 1.2 MB) when it should be 9.60 MB file size at a typical 8-bit color depth for this pixel count.
It is a guess on my part, but I wonder if the export quality on your post-processing editing software is set to 4-bit color depth instead of 8-bit?
If further questions, please reach out to my talk page.
Best,
Gordon --GRDN711 (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sosanto (ship, 1960), bow view, at National Pardon of Boating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquila (ship), bow view, at National Pardon of Boating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FS Aldébaran (M772), port side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Joseph_Roty_II_%28IMO_7362500%29_in_Saint-Malo.jpg/220px-Joseph_Roty_II_%28IMO_7362500%29_in_Saint-Malo.jpg)
Hello Pierre André:
To keep the thousands of ship images in some kind of order, Commons has guidelines for creating and naming the category for a ship. See Category:Ship.
The category Factory Trawler " Joseph Roty II" (ship, 1974) should be changed to Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974).
Your ship category is correctly sub-categorized under Category:IMO 7362500
Best,
Gordon --GRDN711 (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Gordon --GRDN711,
Thank you. thank you for the details relating to the category of the trawler Usine Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974) which I have corrected, following your advice. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 21:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rubicon (ship, 1975), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barge Emilienne ( Cargo), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zelpha (ship, 1959), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SM 199078 Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974), stern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Question Bonjour @Archaeodontosaurus: , j'avais affecté ce bateau la catégorie Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974), qui vient d'être renommée SM 199078 Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974). J(ai bien évidemment corrigé mais faut il relancer la procédure de validation du VICBot2? Merci! Bien amicalement,--Pierre André (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Pas de problème dans ce cas il suffit de synchroniser le scope: c'est fait. Bonne soirée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Island Queen (ship), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valeriya (ship, 1971), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Naiade (ship, 1980), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maksim Litvinov (ship, 1991), stern and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taillefer 3 (ship, 2004), starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sola Gratia (ship, 1927), stern and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:
- Photography in Nigeria
- Photographing vehicles
- I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…
If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!
I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.
Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shlyuzovoy-133 (tugboat, 1975), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roselend (ship, 2000), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
VI nomination of Cum Deo (ship, 1958)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/CUM_DEO_RN4627_6003550%2C_%C3%A0_quai_aux_usines_Lesaffre_%C3%A0_Marcq-en-Bar%C5%93ul_%28d%C3%A9tail%29%29.jpg/220px-CUM_DEO_RN4627_6003550%2C_%C3%A0_quai_aux_usines_Lesaffre_%C3%A0_Marcq-en-Bar%C5%93ul_%28d%C3%A9tail%29%29.jpg)
Hello Pierre André:
I am not sure but this VI image may be salvageable with some tonal tuning in post-processing.
If you lighten the overall exposure by at least 1/3 stop and then push up the shadows and black areas until there is some visible detail, it might make it. The image is sharp.
Also, this would be the stern view.
Best,
Gordon
Hello @GRDN711: Thanks for your advice. Global exposure correction +1/3 and improved shadows and black areas, Thanks for your advice. Best, Pierre André
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ship Niagara Wonder, port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
This Sunday!
Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arbon (ship, 1927), bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cum Deo (ship, 1958), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison des Dévotaires, facade north West, (Aire-sur-la-Lys).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Moulin le Comte d' Aire-sur-la-Lys, Southeast side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Éloi de Bachy, North side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mécanisme du moulin de Riele, 18th-century windmill in Wormhout.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calvaire de Rumes, Southeast side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Persian windmills (type), Southeast side (Terdeghem), France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cog wheels in Steenmeulen windmill, Terdeghem.- France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore Postcard
Please help translate to your language
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/Wiki_Loves_Folklore_Logo.svg/220px-Wiki_Loves_Folklore_Logo.svg.png)
Greetings! Thank you for participating in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 Commons photography competition. Your contributions today have made the world a better place. We're sending you a digital postcard as an appreciation for you being one of the top 100 uploaders during this project. To receive your digital postcard, please complete this form by July 20, 2022.
We hope to see you next year in February 2023.
Gratitude and Wikilove
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont de la Libération (La Glanerie), North west side, Belgique..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mémorial du Motard égaré (La Glanerie), front and left side. (Belgique).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôpital-Hospice Saint-Jean (Aire-sur-la-Lys), Portail, 52 Rue de Saint-Omer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Nieppe, France, viewed from the northeast..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blockhaus B07 (Bray-Dunes), view from north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calvaire des Marins de Bray-Dunes, view from northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Soleil Couchant (Bray-Dunes), view from north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Marie-Bernard (Bray-Dunes), view from north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War memorial in Haisnes, South exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg
Copyright status: File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Merci AntiCompositeBot pour votre remarque, j'ai pposér un bandeau valide de copyright. et une licence ad-hoc au fichier File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg . Cordialement, --Pierre André (talk) 20:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zavikon Island, view North north east side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne Brasserie Dufour de Marchiennes, south view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
loop in your user category
Bonjour Pierre André Leclercq, by chance I found a category loop in your Category:Files by User:Pierre André Leclercq. Assuming, that this is caused by subcategorizing Category:Files by User:Pierre André Leclercq with Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq and vice versa. Besides shuffling all that stuff into one category (I can offer help to do that with VisualFileChange, or you can ask a bot), the cycle can be broken on each side by just having one category as the subcategory of the other. ahoi --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Herzi Pinki Hi, it is with pleasure that you can correct the loop that remains in my user category. I do not master VisualFileChange, and therefore your help will be welcome. Thank you. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 21:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- to be sure, before I start: I will move everything from Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq (with space) to Category:Files by User:Pierre André Leclercq (without space) and redirect the first to the later. Please confirm. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Herzi Pinki I trust you completely and therefore I confirm the procedure. Thank you. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- thanks for that lot of trust, done. I had to change your credit template with respect to the category name, the servers are still updating. In the morning Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq should be empty (I will care for the rest). best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Herzi Pinki Many thanks for your intervention and the change of my credit model in relation to the name of the category. I had noticed this malfunction in my categories, without being able to resolve it Sincerely yours. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I appreciate you loving my intervention. But please don't say thank you for all of my edits on your images :-) It might make me blush. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:39, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Herzi Pinki Many thanks for your intervention and the change of my credit model in relation to the name of the category. I had noticed this malfunction in my categories, without being able to resolve it Sincerely yours. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- thanks for that lot of trust, done. I had to change your credit template with respect to the category name, the servers are still updating. In the morning Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq should be empty (I will care for the rest). best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Herzi Pinki I trust you completely and therefore I confirm the procedure. Thank you. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- to be sure, before I start: I will move everything from Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq (with space) to Category:Files by User:Pierre André Leclercq (without space) and redirect the first to the later. Please confirm. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Source of Vleter Becque, (Godewaersvelde).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:
- Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up:
- Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon” (Ziko)
- The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay)
- You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email.
- Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself!
- And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later.
Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures!
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
WLM Brasil 2022
Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2022!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/WLM_Brasil_2022_-_logo_vermelho.svg/250px-WLM_Brasil_2022_-_logo_vermelho.svg.png)
Olá! O maior concurso fotográfico do mundo está de volta! Que tal participar mais uma vez (ou pela primeira vez!) do Wiki Loves Monuments? A etapa nacional da competição, que este ano está com novidades na faixa de premiação, ocorrerá de 01 a 30 de setembro.
Este ano, teremos novamente três categorias de premiação e um aumento na faixa de prêmios:
- Melhores Imagens, com prêmios de até R$2.500
- Maiores Contribuidores(as), com prêmios de R$200
- Melhor Imagem do Estado do Espírito Santo, com prêmio de R$2.500
Ficou animado(a)? Acesse aqui os mais de 15 mil monumentos listados para a competição deste ano! Fotografe-os e publique suas imagens no Wikimedia Commons durante o mês de setembro.
Ano passado o Brasil ficou em primeiro lugar na etapa internacional do Wiki Loves Monuments com a foto do Real Gabinete Português de Leitura, no Rio de Janeiro, tirada pelo fotógrafo lituano Donatas Dabravolskas. É a nossa chance de repetir este feito!
Para mais informações, confira a página do concurso!
Abraços, --EPorto (WMB) (discussão) 22:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Você recebeu esta mensagem pois já participou do Wiki Loves Monuments ou do Wiki Loves Earth anteriormente. Caso não queira mais receber essas comunicações, deixe uma mensagem em minha página de discussão ou envie um e-mail para eder.portowmnobrasil.org.
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste d'Audresselles, (south east side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte de Beaulieu, (17th century) in Aire-sur-la-Lys.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Las Vegas, 2016 Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Las Vegas, Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (Mandala).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Your edit on Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted
Hi Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 10, I just reverted your edit on Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted ([1]) because the two images that you added do not need categorization any more. They are already in a gallery (old "category"), Commons:Quality_images/Subject/Works_of_art, and they should not copied into this gallery twice. Generally, images are added to Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted by QICbot, not by human editors, unless there is some kind of malfunction of the bot. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. Robert Flogaus-Faust I hadn't noticed this duplicate. Best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pride of Canterbury (ship, 1991), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pompéi les places et les rues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you. Pierre André (talk) 09:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Las Vegas, Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (Mandala).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Las Vegas, Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (Mandala).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
You're invited to provide input…
Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.
In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Frank ,
- Thank you for your message, the proposed letter to the Wikimedia Foundation is an excellent initiative. The idea of launching an investigation into the best long-term solutions on the operation of the MediaWiki software will be welcome to work with its multimedia files. OK to sign the proposed letter, have a nice day. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 08:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de Chinchero, Peru - western exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crosse of couvent Santo Domingo, south exposure.- Cuzco, Peru.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mateo Pumacahua, relief, San Martin Square, Lima, Peru..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Basile Morin (talk) 07:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Steenmeulen, le moulin de pierre Terdeghem (vidéo 2021) (1).ogg
Copyright status: File:Steenmeulen, le moulin de pierre Terdeghem (vidéo 2021) (1).ogg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Steenmeulen, le moulin de pierre Terdeghem (vidéo 2021) (1).ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- @ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque. Cordialement
- Pierre André (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Online workshop this weekend
Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,
This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.
I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne douane Franco-Belge (Estaimpuis), view from south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Azulejos in Paraty, on post office rua do Comércio..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Saint Joseph (Bousbecque), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Town hall of Bousbecque, view from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
JER STE (cargo, 1962), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niche architecturale dédiée à Saint-Martin en façade de la Maison A Saint Martin Rue de Wervicq (Bousbecque ),.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de la Croix Blanche (Bousbecque ), view from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle ND-du-Bon-Secours (Bousbecque), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arsène (ship, 1950), bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:München, magasins du Tal (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mateus2019 (talk) 08:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Seligman Seligman, historic 66 en2016 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mateus2019 (talk) 05:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte aux Boules (Bergues), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oratoire Notre-Dame-du-Sacré-Cœur (Houplines), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte du Port (Bergues), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Chemy, view from North East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cripayo (ship), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hudson ( Cargo ship), Bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Delta (ship, 1957), starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maroni (ship, Li9891F), Bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manou (Cargo, 2004), stern and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Speed (Cargo ship), starboard view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deutscher Soldatenfriedhof Verlinghem, northwest view, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
statue of Saint-Chrysole, Verlinghem northwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame de Lourdes (Bousbecque), northwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Délivrance du Doulieu, northwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-la-Salette du Doulieu, east view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Citroën Ami 6, left front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre Dame du Sacré-Cœur de Boeschepe, view from north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Marie-Consolation-de-la-peur de Boeschepe, view from north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brasserie Catry (Wambrechies), view from Chem. de la Forte Cour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Moissons (Wambrechies), view from North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Butskop (ship, 1925), bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel (6).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame-de-la-Nativité de Fournes-en-Weppes, view from Rue Faidherbe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte-Marguerite (Comines), view from parvis Abbé Dervaux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ben Love (ship, 1988), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jessy (barge, 1954), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saketa (cargo, 1966), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trickster (ship), bow and port side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Noyelles-lès-Seclin, view from Rue d'Emmerin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Echevinal (Noyelles-lès-Seclin), view from place Alexandre Gratte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rupeldam (ship, 1957), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontenay Abbey commendatory house, from the North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Question from the CPUG Board
Dear user group member,
I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.
With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.
That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.
However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022
We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.
Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.
--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontenay Abbey Bookshops, view from north east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estaminet "Le Bruegel" à Bergues, view from rue du Marché aux Fromages.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brasserie-malterie Bécu ( Fampoux), view from Rue Paul Verlaine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
James V relief in Abbey Strand, at the gatehouse of Holyrood Palace, Edinburgh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relais de poste de Chéreng, view from Rte Nationale.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapestries in Chapel Royal Stirling Castle, Scotland - Altar cloth in the Royal Chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferme de Torélies (Thimougies), view from chaussée de Frasnes, Frasnes-lez-Anvaing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Collégiale Notre-Dame-et-Saint-Laurent d'Eu en 2021 (bis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you. Pierre André (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Molenhof te Rodenborg, view from Abdijmolenweg, Kortrijk (Belgium).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferme la Cantine (Thimougies), view from Rue Pétrieux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
West facade of Collégiale Notre-Dame et Saint-Laurent d'Eu, view from Place Isabelle d'Orléans.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte-Pétronille d'Acquin, view from rue Principale in Acquin-Westbécourt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coat of arms of Fontenay abbey en 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ulan Bator.- Gandan Monastery (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you. Pierre André (talk) 09:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Incense burners from Gandan Monastery (Ulan Bator), Megjid Janraisig temple, Mongolia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2022/2023!
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Queti in Gandan Monastery (Ulan Bator), Megjid Janraisig temple, Mongolia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fridrikha Engelsa Street 21, Irkutsk, view from East.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays 2022/2023!
Happy holidays!
Happy holidays, Pierre André Leclercq! ![]() Greetings from Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. |
Happy holidays 2022/2023!
Thanks Pierre André
for your best wishes. Wishing you also happy holidays and a healthy 2023. Greetings from Friesland.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Mes meilleurs voeux
Salut! Merci pour ta message, mon ami. Je te souhaite également, à te et à ta famille, un joyeux Noël et le meilleur pour 2023! Poco a poco (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
2023
Happy holidays Pierre André and a healthy 2023.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of Prince Dimitry Donskoy blessed by Sergius of Radonezh, (15th century), Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays 2022/2023!
Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. --Llez (talk) 09:57, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prokhorovs' chapel, view from Northwest, Novodevichy Convent, Moscow..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sofia Wulfert grave, view from North , Novodevichy cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main altar of the Aryapala Temple Meditation Center, Gorkhi-Terelj National Park, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of Yuri Nikulin, view from North , Novodevichy cemetery (Moscow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vasily Timofeev grave, view from South, Novodevichy Convent, Moscow..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wegkapelletje Luingnestraat ( Aalbeke), Kortrijk, Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château d'Entre-Deux-Monts, Nuits-Saint-Georges, view from South, (Côte-d'Or).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Merci Pierre
Thank you for these wishes! In my turn, if it is allowed to dream, I would like above all to wish to find a way towards peace! ---Ercé (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Demeure des Gouverneurs (Semur-en-Auxois), view from Rue Buffon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass window of Pius IX proclaiming Saint Joseph patron of Universal-Church, Saint Michael's Church, in Dijon..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.