User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Pi bot)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2019 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 13:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 20:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 20:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Chroma on the right. ReneeWrites 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does, thank you :)  Support Good quality ReneeWrites 19:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ascott House 2024 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Slight chroma on the chimneys on the left and right, otherwise good. ReneeWrites 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality ReneeWrites 19:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Imo it needs two (left and right) serious crops. The sun reflection needs to be removed and at the left I would remove the work under construction. In this case a portrait composition might have been better than landescape. The Hall and the Church are the two main objects, all other things don't add anything to the composition --Michielverbeek 07:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support The reflection of the sun, in my opinion, adds expressiveness, continuing the line set by the lighting of the Albert Hall roof. And the construction site is not a critical problem, if you crop it out, then many other interesting and relevant details in the frame will disappear along with it. So good quality, I think. --Vsatinet 18:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:At Tallinn 2024 115.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Busy compo. --Sebring12Hrs 09:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, how might I make it less busy while still showing the controls/track/context? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, depicts train controls well. --Tagooty 08:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would remove the bird near the right crop --Michielverbeek 09:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building in San Francisco 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 331 - Rhône River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Underexposed and needs better file name. --Plozessor 07:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, brightened and renamed, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, a bit blurry and lacking details at the side, but IMO ok now. --Plozessor 14:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]