User talk:Mwaldeck/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 17:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 02:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Medals FISU
Done. --Cesco 82 (talk) 12:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kit body redhorizontalwithyellow.png is uncategorized since 7 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Belgrade_Fair_-_Hall_1_2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
■ MMXXtalk 05:43, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Belgrade_Fair_-_Hall_1.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Belgrade_Fair_-_Hall_1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 12:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
"English Wikipedia"
Hello!
Please remember: COM:L teaches you that "Englisch Wikipedia" is no valid source on Commons. Please stop quoting images like that. Many thanks in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 12:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
This image is of a copy of the website original [1] The actual source credited by "Copyright © 2008 - 2009 Portal da Força Aérea Brasileira ® 2009 República Federativa do Brasil - Todos os direitos reservados." appear to be forbidden use. Please consider this report and act in the proper way. Is it deletion to comply with the WP:NFCC rules???? I wish to follow the legal policy even though I do like the photo. It doesn't seem to meet all criteria. Thank you. Cosmo V(talk) 02:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 595bb3656c79cd2b28d2d28d37ec2cb1
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
![]() |
File:Ordem Nacional Mérito Científico Gra cruz.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Tonyjeff (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ordem Nacional Mérito Científico Medalha Prata.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Tonyjeff (talk) 12:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Area_de_buscas1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
nandhp (talk) 21:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Area_de_buscas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
nandhp (talk) 21:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Universiade
Sure. I'll try to do it in the afternoon. --Filip (§) 09:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Area_de_buscas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
High Contrast (talk) 09:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
logo senai
Bom dia Mwaldeck, Pois é o SENAI quando quer parecer uma instituição do sistema ela coloca o CNI ao lado. Ou melhor para documentos oficiais institucionais ela coloca as duas instituições em destaque. Mas realmente eu acho que não seria ela a marca. Eu só tirei essa pois estava em um documento oficial dela. Eu já comecei a colocar a da cni e aos poucos vou tentando colocar estas outras marcas. Faço isso aos poucos para aprender (contigo inclusive :)) e tentar fazer correto. Agradeço a atenção. Mvdiogo (talk) 11:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Bussereau Câmara Brasil-França.jpg
Hi! Would you mind supplying an English description for File:Bussereau Câmara Brasil-França.jpg? I want to post translation requests into French and German on the village pumps, but in order to do that, it needs an English translation. Thanks in advance :) WhisperToMe (talk) 03:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Mwaldeck :) WhisperToMe (talk) 12:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Deletion request
Escudos de times de futebol já são permitidos na nossa e em várias Wikipédias. Não há problema em deixá-lo lá. Sem contar que fui eu mesmo quem fotografou. Abraços, Junius (talk) 15:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Já lhe expliquei que escudos de times de futebol já são permitidos na nossa e em outras Wikipédias não havendo portanto razão para nenhuma deleção. Abraços, Junius (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, obrigado por me avisar. Mas acho isso besteira. Melhor nos ocuparmos em preencher e ilustrar a Wiki do que perder tempo deletando logos de times que querem mais é aparecer, pois como sabe, a mídia é preenchida só que dá lucro. Mas eu respeito a sua opinião, ainda mais em se tratando de um amigo e sempre muito educado. No mais é só. Preciso dormir porque amanhã vou cobrir um jogo da Terceirona em Macaé. Abraços, Junius (talk) 03:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
O uso restrito de conteúdo abrange os logos de times de futebol, portanto acho bobagem e perda de tempo insistir com esse tipo de cousa. Abraços, Junius (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- O Junius está confundindo alhos com bagulhos =P. Tá achando que as leis que regem a Wikipédia são as mesmas daqui. Além de querer ser nosso tradutor não-oficial. lol Mizunoryu (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- A vida precisa é a NOSSA organização. Os times divulgação precisam NÒS! O Mizu entende NADA DE mesma futebol. Há muito com o que se ocupar. Abraços, Junius (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Não entendo mesmo. Mas entendo de licenças e o que é ou não permitido aqui, cara. Vc por outro lado está viajando na maionese. Mizunoryu (talk) 01:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Foi pro Junius
. E a imagem ainda tá lá. Vc está e não está. De fato logos não são permitidos, mas simples o bastante eles são. A questão do limiar de originalidade é bem complexa. Eu posso achar simples e vc não. Então esses casos são sempre bons serem levados para as DRs para a comunidade obter um consenso. Eu já carregueis imagens que achei simples o bastante, mas a comunidade não e a apagou. Outras foram apagadas por copyvio ou speedydelete mas trazidas de volta no Undeletion Request. Então o que vc fez foi o melhor. Mizunoryu (talk) 14:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Às vezes o nosso julgamento também deve ser baseado na política do país local. Como ocorreu em File:Playmobil_logo.svg. A imagem foi deletada e eu pedi o restauro. A comunidade julgou ela simples de acordo com o Limiar de originalidade alemão que é bem mais abrangente. Brasil e Portugal não possuem lei específica desse tipo, mas a legislação brasileira faz algumas exceções.
Aqui vc mostrou eu acho ela deveras simples. Eu conseguiria fazer em PNG. Só tinha um problema na licença. Embora ela seja inelegível de copyright ela ainda assim possui suas restrições. A licença foi mudada e devidamente atribuída. O mesmo aconteceu com File:Making Movies.svg, que após ficar teve sua licença trocada.
Espero que agora ele tenha entendido e que não ache que estamos de birra com ele .Mizunoryu (talk) 16:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
WikiRio 5.0
Vc vai no Wiki-Rio? Leandro Rocha (talk) 12:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- ótimo, apareça sim, tem muitas coisas que preciso falar com vc, vc é o usuário mais poderoso dentro da wiki que mora próximo. Era bom se o MC fosse tb, mas acho difícil. Eu é que tenho que ver o horário, eles poderiam colocar mais cedo, pq é dia de disputa de samba na Praça Seca a noite e eu concorro la, 18 h ta meio ruim pra mim. se não preciso falar com vc um dia desses, pode ser no meier mesmo. A propósito, vc entende das licenças aqui do commons, da uma olhada na esplanada do commons, deixei um tópico la, mas ninguem deu atenção, e acho importante. Acho que tem foto com VDA. Leandro Rocha (talk) 00:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Soccer_City_2010_jun_10_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.62.200.57 07:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Agência Brasil e outras fotos externas
Mwaldeck, td bem? Eu nunca tinha colocado fotos externas aqui, sempre publicava minhas próprias fotos. Mas para ilustrar alguns artigos de coisas que eu não tenho como fotografar pq não posso estar em dois lugares ao mesmo tempo, resolvi colocar fotos da Agência BR, e de uma espécie de flog que usa licença livre. Vc pode por favor verificar pra mim pra saber se o preenchimento das licenças está correto? Aparece uma tag em muitos deles dizendo que o preenchimento não foi correto, não sei o que está acontecendo. Meus carregamentos, vlw! Leandro Rocha (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- valeu, com as suas dicas, mais as do Rodrigo e do Darwin, agora entendi perfeitamente o que fazer. Abraços! Leandro Rocha (talk) 04:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 00:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:FIFA World Cup 2010 Brazil North Korea 11.jpg
- File:FIFA World Cup 2010 Brazil North Korea 4.jpg
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 07:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Your old request Venues_for_the_2016_Summer_Olympics
I need information and answer to be able to complete your request: Commons:Graphic_Lab/Map_workshop#Venues_for_the_2016_Summer_Olympics. --Goran tek-en (talk) 19:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Venues_for_the_2016_Summer_Olympics
If I don't get the feedback/information I need to complete your request Commons:Graphic_Lab/Map_workshop#Venues_for_the_2016_Summer_Olympics I must thus withdraw my Taken. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:52, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Impa logo.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Impa logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Impa logo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Flickr2Commons
I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. Elisfkc (talk) 18:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Alceu Moreira Nilson Leitao 20170517 2.jpg
- File:Alceu Moreira Nilson Leitao 20170517 3.jpg
- File:Alceu Moreira Nilson Leitao 20170517 4.jpg
- File:Atila Nunes 20170518.jpg
- File:Carmen Lucia 20170503 1.jpg
- File:Carmen Lucia 20170503 2.jpg
- File:Carmen Lucia 20170503 3.jpg
- File:Carmen Lucia 20170503 4.jpg
- File:Carmen Lucia 20170503 5.jpg
- File:Carmen Lucia 20170503 6.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 1.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 2.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 3.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 4.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 5.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 6.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 7.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 8.jpg
- File:Cracolandia 20170522 9.jpg
- File:Eunicio Oliveira Mauricio Godinho Delgado 25052017 1.jpg
- File:Eunicio Oliveira Mauricio Godinho Delgado 25052017 2.jpg
- File:Eunicio Oliveira Mauricio Godinho Delgado 25052017 3.jpg
- File:Eunicio Oliveira Mauricio Godinho Delgado 25052017 4.jpg
- File:Leonardo Ulrich Steiner 2017 03 15.jpg
- File:Luciana Lossio 20170510 1.jpg
- File:Luciana Lossio 20170510 2.jpg
- File:Maria Ceica cropped.png
- File:Mauricio Godinho Delgado cropped.png
- File:Nilson Leitao 20170517 5.jpg
- File:Nilson Leitao 20170517 6.jpg
- File:Nilson Leitao 20170517 7.jpg
- File:Nilson Leitao 20170517 8.jpg
- File:Nilson Leitao 20170517 9.jpg
- File:Othon Bastos cropped.png
- File:Ricardo Molina 20170522 1.jpg
- File:Ricardo Molina 20170522 2.jpg
- File:Ricardo Molina 20170522 3.jpg
- File:Ricardo Molina 20170522 4.jpg
- File:Tadeu Filippelli 20170523 1.jpg
- File:Tadeu Filippelli 20170523 2.jpg
- File:Tadeu Filippelli cropped.png
- File:Terminal Bandeira SaoPaulo 2017 03 15.jpg
- File:Velorio Nelson Xavier 20170511 1.jpg
- File:Velorio Nelson Xavier 20170511 2.jpg
- File:Velorio Nelson Xavier 20170511 3.jpg
- File:Yves Leterme 2017 03 21 1.jpg
- File:Yves Leterme 2017 03 21 2.jpg
Unfortunately, content from Agência Brasil's website is no longer free but has a non-commerical restriction that is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons. Regards, De728631 (talk) 21:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Luciana Rabello.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2804:7F1:C080:8CEA:A9C4:83FE:918C:1C8E 21:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)