Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Russell Falls 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Russell Falls 2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2009 at 10:32:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 10:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Noodle snacks (talk) 10:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Info location missed. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral Way too similar to this candidate, which will be promoted soon. Where's the creativity, folks? -- JovanCormac 11:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Creativity is a cliché. Should be a welcome change from all the insects no? Noodle snacks (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Can you take a picture of an insect on waterfall at sunset? If you get Adam or Duvora restore it, that would be the ultimate FP. :P Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- I almost fell over when I read this. That was FUNNY! -- JovanCormac 17:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Can you take a picture of an insect on waterfall at sunset? If you get Adam or Duvora restore it, that would be the ultimate FP. :P Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Creativity is a cliché. Should be a welcome change from all the insects no? Noodle snacks (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nevertheless, it's a very good picture. Airwolf (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yes it is.--DPC (talk) 16:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Even better then the other one --Simonizer (talk) 21:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 08:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Beautiful, but ... :-). Two problems, the sky was inevitably over exposed - the trees top right look a bit washed out, and in this one the movement of the tree ferns (far right) is a little more than subtle. So does the very long exposure produce a better photo than you could have achieved otherwise? It is a bit like night shots, great images but are they the best way to portray the subject? --Tony Wills (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is the best way for this subject. There is lots of spray, so a polariser is really helpful (and it improves colour saturation and reduces dynamic range). The ferns are blurred at much faster exposures anyway (I did try it), so a moot point imo. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Paris 16 (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Einstein2 (talk) 11:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Friendlystar (talk) 02:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support--663h (talk) 13:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support-- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural